View Single Post
  #58  
Old April 27th 07, 07:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Daryl Hunt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 63
Default VISUAL AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION


"Tankfixer" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article ,
mumbled

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
news
In article ,

mumbled

"Tankfixer" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article et,
mumbled
----------
In article

. net,
Tankfixer
wrote:

If it were classified secret FAS would have been closed for

publishing
it to the web.

Actually, that's not true.

Are you saying one can post current classified publications on the

net
and not get in trouble ?

I can see you are trying to twist things into the other person

showing
some
kind of weakness. Now, put your EID kit away and go play somewhere

else
or
dummy up a bit more. Classifications change faster than the wind

direction.


Sure daryl, twist it anyway you like.

While you are at it tell us again about the FB-4 nuclear bombers of

the
1960's.


LOL, you have already been blown out of the water on that one. Guess

you
are just recycling your old lies. Ask Ed if he ever was on a Nuke

loaded
Phantom. He's already stated he has. But, again, don't let facts get

in
the way of you recycling your lies. You and Leturd must go drinking
together soon.


There is no question that F-4's darried nukes.
The point of contention was your claim they were called "FB-4"

No one every supported that claim.


McDonnell Douglas classed it as a Fighter/Bomber. Do you mean they are
wrong and you are right?

Standard 404thk00k 3rd grade debating as usual.