You know, when I went to graduate school all the courses were case study.
You got an automatic "F" if you ever handed in a paper that concluded that
there wasn't enough information to make a decision.

There is always more to know. My comment that "a failed alternator hardly
qualifies as an emergency landing situation" is absolutely correct. But, if
you throw in IMC, a fire in the cabin, the prop falling off, the engine
spraying oil, a 747 filling the windshield, or any other number of items,
clearly it becomes an emergency.

That said, "a failed alternator hardly qualifies as an emergency landing
situation".

Always a pleasure to be guided by you, however.

Michael


"Sydney Hoeltzli" wrote in message
...
Michael 182 wrote:

"Snowbird" wrote in message
om...

"Michael 182" wrote in message
news:W3cVa.166058$N7.22674@sccrnsc03...

Yeah, I liked that part as well. Not to mention that a failed
alternator
hardly qualifies as an emergency landing situation...

Judge it when you're there.

Right, cause no one in this group ever expresses opinions...

You know what they say "opinions are like a**holes everyone has
one". But you asked for it, you got it.
So IMO, YO that "a failed alternator hardly qualifies as an
emergency landing situation" based on very limited info, is
pure bunk.

Toyota,
Sydney