Robert M. Gary wrote:
Very true. In fact the death count in D.C. continues to be higher than
the count in Iraq. You're safer in Iraq than the streets of D.C.

Take that DC death count--the real one--and subtract from that the
number of "drug-related" corner boys killing corner boys. Take the Iraq
death count and add to it the number of catastrophic body
damage--people who will never walk, talk, see, think straight again.
And your Iraq death count, of course, will include the thousands of
Iraqis caught in the crossfire. I mean, their welfare was the point of
this war, according to the neo-cons--or are they some kind of non-human
casualty not to considered in your debased calculations?