View Single Post
  #28  
Old October 15th 06, 08:27 PM posted to us.military.navy,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval,alt.politics.bush,us.politics
William Black[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default the USS Eisenhower Carrier Battle Group doesn't make for a 'massive' build-up for war with Iran


"Darn Good Intelligence" wrote in message
oups.com...

Al Smith wrote:
"Diplomatic buildup"? **** that, it won't work. Just nuke their sites
now or pay the price for a nuclear-armed terrorist state in the

future.
Are YOUR balls big enough to deal with the threat, or do you

advocate
appeasement?


How quaint.

Someone who thinks any sort of conflict short of all out nuclear war

is
'apeasement'.

How stupid will you look if Iran already has nukes and one goes off in

a
shipping container in New York City AFTER the US drops nuclear weapons

on
them?



For that matter, how stupid does he look advocating the senseless
murder of hundreds of thousands of human beings?


Well they'd want to do the same to us, it's dog eat dog as far as I'm
concerned.

No.

At no time has any major Muslim figure in power in a nation state called for
the destruction of all non Muslims.

What they'd like is the West to go away. They'll settle for Coke and Levis
and computers (with no net connection) and all the technology but they'd
prefer us to keep things like democracy and free speech and female equality
to ourselves.

--
William Black

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe.
Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland
I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate
All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach
Time for tea.