From: " jls"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
Subject: bogus issue
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:00:42 -0400
Lines: 29
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

From: " jls"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.homebuilt
Subject: Bogus Issue
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:10:01 -0400
Lines: 18
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106


"GaryP" wrote in message
om...
Did you ever consider the insurance the airport operator carries and the
restrictions their policy might have?

Bogus issue. Airport fixed base operators are corporations, shielding
investors from personal liability. Independent flight instructors are
usually not. Try again. Besides, AVL's sham requirements have MONOPOLY
and CONSPIRACY IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE AND COMPETITION written all over them,
since the only flight school on the field fits the sham requirements.

AVL already tried to keep independent limo and taxi service out. A lawsuit
settled that. Another lawsuit will settle this. What you want to do,
fella? Privatize federally supported public airports?