On Sunday, May 17, 2020 at 8:30:04 AM UTC-7, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
When recording at 1 second intervals, with a 1 second resolution, this can
happen. When it does. download again at (say) 4 second intervals.


Properly designed software would validate the output it produces.

If the spec for an IGC file stipulates that the timestamps on each record must be different and increasing, then why doesn't the FR drop those? There's already various algorithms in there massaging the data, so why isn't there logic to ensure the file is correctly formatted?

5Z