View Single Post
  #16  
Old April 23rd 04, 07:04 PM
Frijoles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Similarly configured, the STOVL JSF has better legs than the E/F Hornet --
the jet that will fill the lion's share of the duty on "conventional
carriers." It will also have a lower RCS, and similar or better weapons
system.

Does this mean we shouldn't have big deck CVs -- nope. It just means there
will be more platforms available to put tacair at sea.


"Pechs1" wrote in message
...
Guy- So what the hell is left to call a FLEET AIR ARM????????

Joint Force Harrier, until the JSF enters service. And all the helos.
BRBR


When they got rid of the conventional CVs, they lost their true ability at

sea
control. The JSF, altho whizbang, will not perform like a CV based

A/C...in
terms of legs, capability, etc..Like the aluminum surface ships that got

beat
up in the Falklands, it looks good on paper, it is cheaper but it won't do

the
complete job.
P. C. Chisholm
CDR, USN(ret.)
Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye

Phlyer