View Single Post
  #9  
Old July 3rd 03, 11:35 PM
Giz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"John Carrier" wrote in message
...

Mobility.


Carrier aircraft are more mobile than land-based aircraft?


Where is Edwards AFB? Where is the USS John C. Stennis?
Where will both be 6 months from now?




Concrete independent ... no basing agreements required with Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Italy, you-name-it.. The fact that a CVBG offshore

makes
a
political statement that a wing of B-2's sitting in Whiteman cannot

make.


How are any of those advantages?


Aircraft that you cannot use for political reasons are worse than useless.
They
have cost you, but are not returning on the investment. You honestly can't
see
the advantage of a CVBG off a hostile coast over a wing of B-2's in middle
America? Open your eyes. Even the Air Force doesn't try to make the
argument you are. They did before, but have come to their senses. CV
aviation will not replace shore based aviation, but it will not succumb to
it either.

Giz