View Single Post
  #70  
Old July 20th 04, 12:28 AM
Dude
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is a good argument, potentially, cost of operation.

The Centurion could, if well supported, and up to its marketing, replace
about every engine in the 140 to 180 HP range. That is a lot of engines.
Only problem is the chicken and the egg.

Who will pay to get all the mechanics trained? Will they put together good
english manuals, pdf's, videos? Will there be someone to call during normal
US hours who speaks english and knows the engine and the FAA regs?

100LL is not necessarily going away, but its possible that when it does, it
will go quickly. Also, the less we use, the more expensive it will get ( at
least that is my guess, perhaps someone else knows better.)




"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Dan Luke wrote:

"Thomas Borchert" wrote:
In Europe, the Diesel is a total winner.


It should be here, too.


There's no good argument for using them in the States. Gas isn't that much

more
expensive (if at all) than Jet-A, and gas is readily available in the

lower 48. When
that changes, you'll see more diesels here. Do a comparison of the diesel

and gas
Maules. The diesel costs more, is slower (due to cooling drag), and

carries less
weight (the engine weighs more). I also think it's pretty ugly, with that

Hawker
Typhoon style cowling, but that's a personal opinion.

George Patterson
In Idaho, tossing a rattlesnake into a crowded room is felony

assault.
In Tennessee, it's evangelism.