Ron Rosenfeld wrote:


I agree that it is unusual, and I'm not certain of the appropriate wording
in this circumstance. However, the NACO chart calls for flying the 098°
track, whereas the JEPP chart call for flying a 118° track! Something is
really screwed up here.

Also, I believe you have misinterpreted a portion of the missed approach
procedure. Probably especially important in view of that tower NW of
CISON:

You write, "... after crossing CISON ...".

But CISON is depicted, on both the Jepp and the NACO charts, as a fly-by WP
and not as a fly-over WP. "Fly-by waypoints are used when an aircraft
should begin a turn to the next course prior to reaching the waypoint". So
you should not be "crossing CISON".
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)

Yup!

The Jepp database supplied to our Universal FMS's definitely shows a 120
degree track from CISON to BREIT, and that CISON is fly past, so you
should begin your turn before the waypoint. NACO obviously goofed on
this one.

A double-take on the chart should alert you that 098 *cannot* take you
from CISON to BREIT, as 098 is the outbound heading of the hold, and is
clearly at a different angle than the CISON to BREIT leg.

Happy Flying!
Scott Skylane