JL and I think alike. I ended up using the widest runway too for the
runway specified in the length field, and I also specified the longest
runway if more than one at that width.

The descriptions look like this:

"12/30 2000x50ft DIRT"
"C122.8 U122.8 100LL 10/28 4000x75ft ASPH-E"
"C126.1 U122.95 100LL 04L/22R 4401x75ft ASPH-G 04R/22L 4870x75ft ASPH-
G"
"03L/21R 10012x150ft ASPH 03R/21L 9904x150ft CONC"

From left to right, they contain:

[CTAF-freq] [UNICOM-freq(s)] [100LL] [Runway1 ...]

.... where each Runway looks like

[Designation LxWft Surface]

.... and in many cases only one or two of the first three fields have
values.

Does that look useful? Any other suggestions?

2NO