View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 21st 03, 07:20 AM
toadmonkey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 20 Aug 2003 22:35:14 -0700, (Ken Sandyeggo) wrote:

(Mr. MD500) wrote in message ...
On 18 Aug 2003 19:51:13 -0700,
(Jim Eli) wrote:

"Gig Giacona" wrote in message ...
Are any of you guys flying for "small" SOs that have received their
helicopters from the military? How is your program set up? What are pilot
requirements?

IMHO, as "public use", SOs are not required to abide by FAA
regulations. In fact, pilots do not need to be licensed. However,
I'm not aware of any SO doing this.


Here comes another one of those "police pilots are not licensed"
threads.

Fact is isnsurance carriers will require a commercial license,
minimum. For liability reasons, no agency would allow a unlicensed
persion to pilot their aircraft. Thats basic common sense . At a
minimum, law enforcement aircraft are maintained to part 91 standards.


They don't have to use certificated aircraft, however.

And what is overlooked is because of the high liability issues involving both
city and county goverments, they have the option of becoming self-insured,
courtesy of the state government. So if they insure themselves, who's gonna
complain *if* they don't license their pilots? The waiting game is often used
by city and county governments when someone makes a claim, regardless of how
justified the claim may be. If they can wait you out long enough, you lose the
funding and the will to continue a suit. Happens quite often.
TM

--
Toadmonkey: "Now now. Brain popping and world crashing may be hazardous to ones perception of reality.
Very dangerous business that can lead to madness or something worse for some, truth."


Remove "3+4" from addy before replying


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----