If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Better Boundary Layers
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:08:46 -0700, Eric Greenwell
wrote: No, but Dick only tested one glider, and a very early one (early '94 production). Several changes have been made in the wing since then, such as more blowholes, adding winglets, an additional flap position, and using NACA ducts instead of pitot tubes. My experience flying my ASH 26 E (built in early '95, retrofitted with NACA ducts and winglets, and no profiling or sanding of the surfaces) against DG 800s and Ventus 2 CMs is that all three have nearly indistinguishable performance differences. But the 26 is the only one with blow turbulators and it goes no better than the two gliders without. I think you just made my point. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange Class D boundary??? | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 2 | August 30th 04 01:56 PM |
F104- Boundary Layer Control | Scet | Military Aviation | 7 | August 27th 04 09:48 AM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |