![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When flaps are in the land position and boundary layer control is active, is
there an increase in EGT that is sufficient to register on the cockpit gauge? If so, does the pilot look for the EGT rise to ensure the system is working? If not, is there an indication that the system is inoperative, is the aircrafts handling characteristics on approach indicative of system failure, or is it fail safe? Scet |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Scet;
I just noticed this post in passing. I'm sure Walt will comment from a first hand point of view, and the zip was one I missed in my "garage" of fighters I've flown. I'll take a shot at what you want and see how close it gets to being right anyway! :-) If I remember right, the BLC on the zip was actuated by a valve directly linked to the flap extension system. The EGT should be a function of the power percentage and nozzle position. I believe the EGT should be somewhere below 560 degrees on final with the BLC operative with flaps over 15 degrees. I don't remember what the visual indication was if any for the zipper to confirm BLC operation, but if memory serves, 82 to 85% rings a bell as a minimum on final to avoid uncommanded roll and sink. Keep in mind; I didn't fly this bird and am going on recall from hashing with some friends who did. Walt will have better answers for you I'm sure. Hope this helps a bit anyway. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the at with what goes there and take out the Z's please! dhenriquesZatZearthZlinkZdotZnet "Scet" wrote in message ... When flaps are in the land position and boundary layer control is active, is there an increase in EGT that is sufficient to register on the cockpit gauge? If so, does the pilot look for the EGT rise to ensure the system is working? If not, is there an indication that the system is inoperative, is the aircrafts handling characteristics on approach indicative of system failure, or is it fail safe? Scet |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Dudley,
My train of thought was that EGT should be relatively stable the moment flaps to land was selected. If EGT was say 530 degrees and flaps were selected to land, the valve linked to the flap system would open, removing air from the compressor/diffuser. A portion of this air is also used to cool the turbine, so removing it should cause an EGT rise. Is it this rise in EGT that is looked for to ensure the system is operative? Is there a thermal switch that is made to indicate the system is or isn't working or is the first inkling that the pilot has that all is not as it should be, aircraft controllability issues during the approach phase? Did the 105 or F4 have BLC and if so what indications did they give the pilot? It would be good to hear from Walt or maybe even Ed Rasimus may know? Thanks for your input Dudley....and thanks to you and John Ward in regards to the 51....I can't wait. Scet "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message hlink.net... Hi Scet; I just noticed this post in passing. I'm sure Walt will comment from a first hand point of view, and the zip was one I missed in my "garage" of fighters I've flown. I'll take a shot at what you want and see how close it gets to being right anyway! :-) If I remember right, the BLC on the zip was actuated by a valve directly linked to the flap extension system. The EGT should be a function of the power percentage and nozzle position. I believe the EGT should be somewhere below 560 degrees on final with the BLC operative with flaps over 15 degrees. I don't remember what the visual indication was if any for the zipper to confirm BLC operation, but if memory serves, 82 to 85% rings a bell as a minimum on final to avoid uncommanded roll and sink. Keep in mind; I didn't fly this bird and am going on recall from hashing with some friends who did. Walt will have better answers for you I'm sure. Hope this helps a bit anyway. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the at with what goes there and take out the Z's please! dhenriquesZatZearthZlinkZdotZnet "Scet" wrote in message ... When flaps are in the land position and boundary layer control is active, is there an increase in EGT that is sufficient to register on the cockpit gauge? If so, does the pilot look for the EGT rise to ensure the system is working? If not, is there an indication that the system is inoperative, is the aircrafts handling characteristics on approach indicative of system failure, or is it fail safe? Scet |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:10:39 +0930, "Scet" wrote
in rec.aviation.military: Is it this rise in EGT that is looked for to ensure the system is operative? Is there a thermal switch that is made to indicate the system is or isn't working or is the first inkling that the pilot has that all is not as it should be, aircraft controllability issues during the approach phase? Hi Scet I don't believe there was any variations in the EGT used to verify if the BLC system is working or not, but I will try to verify this with a friend who used to fly the 104 and see if he can remember. In the meantime, this is what the T.O. 1F-104G-1 has to say about a BLC malfunction : "If a boundary layer control system malfunction is experienced as manifested by a strong rolling tendency as the wing flaps travel to the LAND position, proceed as follows : 1. Flaps-TAKEOFF. 2. Throttle-Adjust to minimum safe setting to reduce the effect of asymmetric BLC while flaps are returning to TAKEOFF. 3. Fly final approach at not less than 195 KIAS with flaps in TAKEOFF position. 4. Touch down at 165 KIAS minimum." Regards Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scet" wrote in message ... Hi Dudley, My train of thought was that EGT should be relatively stable the moment flaps to land was selected. If EGT was say 530 degrees and flaps were selected to land, the valve linked to the flap system would open, removing air from the compressor/diffuser. A portion of this air is also used to cool the turbine, so removing it should cause an EGT rise. Is it this rise in EGT that is looked for to ensure the system is operative? Makes sense, but I'll be surprised if Walt or Ed verify that looking for an EGT rise on final in a 104 would be the indication for BLC operation. It's more likely a bulb indicator if anything I would imagine, but I could be wrong. I'm guessing you get blown flaps over 15 degrees as an automatic function of the direct linkage to the flap system. I do know this however. The zip guys have told me they knew pretty fast if it was working if they at any time powered back below 80% :-)) Hope Walt and Ed take this up for you. Take care, D |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 21:10:39 +0930, "Scet"
wrote: Did the 105 or F4 have BLC and if so what indications did they give the pilot? It would be good to hear from Walt or maybe even Ed Rasimus may know? Thanks for your input Dudley....and thanks to you and John Ward in regards to the 51....I can't wait. Scet The F-105 did not have BLC. The F-4 did, prior to the soft wing, for both leading and trailing edge flaps. I don't recall any landing check of engine indication for BLC proper operation. The BLC was checked by the crewchief during preflight when flaps were lowered by his simply running a hand along the area to feel the blowing. There was a warning circuit for BLC duct pressure that illuminated a caution light on the telelight panel in the event of a line rupture. That was very serious emergency as the superheated air would quickly lead to structural damage to the wing. In later years some portion of the BLC was eliminated, but I don't recall which parts. Maybe someone with some soft-wing experience can recall. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" "Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights" Both from Smithsonian Books ***www.thunderchief.org |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The F-105 did not have BLC. The F-4 did, prior to the soft wing, for
both leading and trailing edge flaps. I don't recall any landing check of engine indication for BLC proper operation. The BLC was checked by the crewchief during preflight when flaps were lowered by his simply running a hand along the area to feel the blowing. There was a warning circuit for BLC duct pressure that illuminated a caution light on the telelight panel in the event of a line rupture. That was very serious emergency as the superheated air would quickly lead to structural damage to the wing. In later years some portion of the BLC was eliminated, but I don't recall which parts. Maybe someone with some soft-wing experience can recall. Ed Rasimus The BLC on the F-4 drew air from the 13th stage compressor. I seem to recall from my days as a propulsion engineer that the EGT rise for the BLC valve open was no more than 15 degrees. The valve istelf was connected to the flap linkage When the flaps were lowered, a rod connected to flap structure pulled the BLC valve open. The circuitry that Ed refers to was on that linkage iself. When the flaps were down and the wheels were up the "Wheels" light flashed theoretically telling you to put your wheels down if you were going to fly with flaps down. If you had both wheels and flaps up, that supposedly meant you had a BLC valve stuck open and the possibility that Ed refered to, hot air being pumped to the flaps, existed and you needed to get the plane on the gropund ASAP as serious damage to things like hydraulic lines and electrcal connections would happen soon. I saw one F-4D that had an actual BLC failure. The leading edge was seriously warped and the crew was luck to get the plane on the ground. Most of the time the "Flashing Wheels Light" was a switch problem and was a real maintenance problem and a high manhour driver not to mention a strain on the runway rescue crews. The BLC system was eventually capped off at the valve port on the engine and the planes flew without it. Made landinf speeds 10-15 knots higher, no big deal in the F-4. In the early days of the F-4 in Europe, the F-4s sometimes refueled from AFR recip/jet KC-97 aircraft at 220 kts or so and half flaps. Never had the opportunity to do but that flasing lights in the cockpit would have driven me nuts. Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Mellenthin" wrote in message ... The F-105 did not have BLC. The F-4 did, prior to the soft wing, for both leading and trailing edge flaps. I don't recall any landing check of engine indication for BLC proper operation. The BLC was checked by the crewchief during preflight when flaps were lowered by his simply running a hand along the area to feel the blowing. There was a warning circuit for BLC duct pressure that illuminated a caution light on the telelight panel in the event of a line rupture. That was very serious emergency as the superheated air would quickly lead to structural damage to the wing. In later years some portion of the BLC was eliminated, but I don't recall which parts. Maybe someone with some soft-wing experience can recall. Ed Rasimus The BLC on the F-4 drew air from the 13th stage compressor. I seem to recall from my days as a propulsion engineer that the EGT rise for the BLC valve open was no more than 15 degrees. The valve istelf was connected to the flap linkage When the flaps were lowered, a rod connected to flap structure pulled the BLC valve open. The circuitry that Ed refers to was on that linkage iself. When the flaps were down and the wheels were up the "Wheels" light flashed theoretically telling you to put your wheels down if you were going to fly with flaps down. If you had both wheels and flaps up, that supposedly meant you had a BLC valve stuck open and the possibility that Ed refered to, hot air being pumped to the flaps, existed and you needed to get the plane on the gropund ASAP as serious damage to things like hydraulic lines and electrcal connections would happen soon. I saw one F-4D that had an actual BLC failure. The leading edge was seriously warped and the crew was luck to get the plane on the ground. Most of the time the "Flashing Wheels Light" was a switch problem and was a real maintenance problem and a high manhour driver not to mention a strain on the runway rescue crews. The BLC system was eventually capped off at the valve port on the engine and the planes flew without it. Made landinf speeds 10-15 knots higher, no big deal in the F-4. In the early days of the F-4 in Europe, the F-4s sometimes refueled from AFR recip/jet KC-97 aircraft at 220 kts or so and half flaps. Never had the opportunity to do but that flasing lights in the cockpit would have driven me nuts. Steve Excellent and informative answers guys, couldn't ask for more. Thanks. Scet |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
Control Tower Controversy brewing in the FAA | PlanetJ | Instrument Flight Rules | 168 | December 6th 03 01:51 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |