BLAIR was a VISIONARY

No - not Tony Blair.

I am talking about Eric Arthur Blair, who wrote under the name of
George Orwell.

He was a "Redcap" - a military policeman - in India. He was apalled at
the maltreatment of the Indian people. Clearly, he had noticed that
there were "Brothers" amongst the British "authorities" who used the
principle of REVERSAL in everyday life. All morals are BACKWARD.

Good is evil. Slavery is freedom. Truth is lies. Lies are true.

Eight Popes of Rome had condemned this "sect" which began, under its
current name, in England in 1712. Here is the first encyclical
condemning this gang with reversed morals:

http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm

So now you know their name. You also know their only big secret -
REVERSAL. They are cruel to their friends (love is hatred). They force
each other into crime. Then they blackmail each other with punishment
for the crimes they were forced to commit. To avoid punishment, the
members must commit MORE crimes - to order.

They don't get paid. They become slaves. They obey out of FEAR.

So from the initial big secret, emerge MORE secrets. They publish that
they are GOOD. If the public knew the truth about them, they could not
betray the public.

Yet MORE secrets - the names of their members. And MORE - the various
PLOTS, from local crime to the nuclear bomb.

Orwell obviously was determined to expose this evil. However, if one
names names one gets killed. So he encapsulated the princples of the
"sect" into a book, which became world-famous. It is "1984".

Here are Peter Cushing, Donald Pleasance and other famous actors and
actresses in a classic filming of that book:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hATC_2I1wZE

In the present situation, now that 1984 has come and gone, the various
Western governments are even WORSE than depicted in the book and
movie. We are given the ILLUSION of free elections - of democracy.
However, we can vote LIBMSN, LABMSN, CONMSN, COMMSN, INDMSN or any
other MSN party. Each is a slave.

Tony was a slave.

The purpose is, of course, WORLD DOMINATION. In the movie the empire
is "OCEANIA".

Big Brother is indeed watching you. Big Brother is the "allseeing
eye".

Andy McCardle can be seen in his coffin at the bottom of this page. He
had reported "Brothers" dressed as policemen, who were passing heroin
to pushers, to other "Brothers" dressed as policemen ( at the police
station). The "allseeing eye of Big Brother" was watching him. He was
murdered by "Brothers" dressed as doctors, in Carstairs "Hospital".

Similarly, Eric Arthur Blair was murdered by "doctors" in the old
Royal Free hospital, in Hampstead, London. Treatment for his
tuberculosis was available, but denied to him. The new Royal Free is
no better.

At the top of that page is the octagenarian Norman "The Conqueror"
Scarth. He conquered the British government at the European Court of
Human Rights in 1999:

http://www.ukmm.org.uk/camp/hr/scarth.htm

One would have thought that the British government would have been
discouraged from holding legal hearings in secret - which they
admitted to in Paragraph 25 of that report.

No - WRONG is RIGHT. "Brother" Lord Justice Morritt said "European
Convention on Human Rights is not part of our law in the way the
European Community law is".

So, Big Brother has an excuse for excluding Britain from Human Rights.
Hypocrisy is VIRTUE, so far-away CHINA is condemned for OSTENSIBLE
human rights transgressions - which the western public cannot verify -
whilst Britain ignores its own obligations under the treaty.

Oh, yes, the treaty. According to the University of Leeds, Britain was
a signatory to that treaty long before the European Community was even
thought of: "The Convention was finalised in 1950, with the UK as an
original signatory and ratifying state in 1951. It came into force in
1953."

As "punishment" for his success, the "Conqueror" was now faced with a
string of FAKE accusations by the "Big Brother" government. In
addition, he was thrown into the psychiatric ward of a hospital. When
"Big Brother" loses the argument, he declares his opponent to be mad.

More recently, Maurice Kirk, the "Flying Vet" - and perfectly sane -
was thrown into prison on trumped-up charges. They relate to a gun
that (1) DIDN'T WORK, and that (2) Maurice DIDN'T WANT. He sold it as
an ornament.

Maurice had bought a plane from a film company. He only wanted the
plane.

In prison, he spoke too sanely. The public must not see how sane he
is. It was agreed by the "Brothers" that all hearings would be held
over a video link. He tried it once, and they threw the switch and cut
him off.

Maurice went on hunger-strike to protest at the violation of Article 6
- the same issue as in the Scarth ruling.

Knowing from the Scarth decision that hearings in secret are WRONG,
the "Brothers" in the British government "know" that they are RIGHT.
They were not DIS-couraged, but EN-couraged by the ruling.

Look at Maurice Kirk in his movies. He is perfectly sane. His personna
is not even "eccentric". It is the mind of a fun-loving adventurer:

http://kirkflyingvet.com/Default.aspx

As I write this, Maurice is still being detained in Cardiff, Wales,
UK.

Charles Douglas Wehner