![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All,
This information may be well known but I felt compelled to pass it along. I've been searching for a Nicopress Swaging tool and choking on the prices at the typcial aircraft supply companies. Turns out that Lowes has a Campbell Nicipress tool, 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch for $24.95. The tool is located in the rope,chain and stell cable area. I assume the less expense tool will perform adequately, based on go/no-go verification. Cheers, Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:52:26 GMT, "Gary T. Ciampa" wrote:
All, This information may be well known but I felt compelled to pass it along. I've been searching for a Nicopress Swaging tool and choking on the prices at the typcial aircraft supply companies. Turns out that Lowes has a Campbell Nicipress tool, 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch for $24.95. The tool is located in the rope,chain and stell cable area. I assume the less expense tool will perform adequately, based on go/no-go verification. Be advised that the tool *may* be somewhat different than the standard aviation variety. "Normal" aviation swages are designed so that the length of the swaged areas for 1/16" and 3/32" cable is just slightly less than the length of the nicopress sleeve. I bought a swage about 15 years ago, though, that had a length of swaged area less than 1/2 the length of the sleeves. This is nominally not a problem, since you can just hit the sleeve several times, like you do with 1/8" and larger. However, most aviation guides to nicopressing call for only *one* swage on 1/16" and 3/32" sleeves. If you follow those instructions with these "short" swages, only half the sleeve length will be compressed and it probably won't develop the full rated strength. The interesting thing, I bought that "short" swage from an aviation vendor. Anyway, with the appropriate number of compressions and the correct go/no-go gauge, it'll probably work fine. Personally, I bought another swage. Ron Wanttaja |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note that there is also available an "economy swaging tool" (see Aircraft
Spruce catalog P/N 12-12000) for $15.95. It takes more time to do the swage (you tighten bolts to swage the sleeve) but that's not a big problem unless you work on an assembly line and have hundreds of these things to do. This tool has been recommended in the "canard pusher" newsletter. Has anybody any comments on this? Are there any potential problems with picky inspectors? "Gary T. Ciampa" wrote in message om... All, This information may be well known but I felt compelled to pass it along. I've been searching for a Nicopress Swaging tool and choking on the prices at the typcial aircraft supply companies. Turns out that Lowes has a Campbell Nicipress tool, 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch for $24.95. The tool is located in the rope,chain and stell cable area. I assume the less expense tool will perform adequately, based on go/no-go verification. Cheers, Gary |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:59:04 -0500, "Pierre"
wrote: Note that there is also available an "economy swaging tool" (see Aircraft Spruce catalog P/N 12-12000) for $15.95. It takes more time to do the swage (you tighten bolts to swage the sleeve) but that's not a big problem unless you work on an assembly line and have hundreds of these things to do. This tool has been recommended in the "canard pusher" newsletter. Has anybody any comments on this? Are there any potential problems with picky inspectors? I have this tool and confirm that it does what it's supposed to do. I think it's insane to buy the expensive tool when the less expensive one does the job precisely as well as the more expensive one, it just takes longer. Please note, there is no difference in the resultant swaged cable end whether using the cheap tool or the expensive one, the end result is exactly, repeat, exactly the same. In fact, I borrowed the expensive tool once and had to discard the parts because the owner called me up later and told me that he'd been contacted by the manufacturer and was told that the tool had been improperly manufactured and could produce substandard swages. So the cheap tool worked better than the expensive one. If you tighten the bolts till the two halves of the cheap swaging tool bottom out together, how can the result be any different than the more expensive tool? Corky Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky... the swages must still be checked against a "go - nogo" criteria ..
measuring tool.. We had a control cable here that came apart in-flight, swage failed.. a tool was used that had previously been determined to produce substandard swages.. it was kept around for some reason.. another mechanic used it a couple years later on an aircraft and did not check the go/nogo, the aileron cable came apart.. the pilot was able to emergency land in the desert with no major damage.. rudder/elevator only.. the mechanic was fired.. and a letter put in his FAA folder.. BT "Corky Scott" wrote in message ... On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:59:04 -0500, "Pierre" wrote: Note that there is also available an "economy swaging tool" (see Aircraft Spruce catalog P/N 12-12000) for $15.95. It takes more time to do the swage (you tighten bolts to swage the sleeve) but that's not a big problem unless you work on an assembly line and have hundreds of these things to do. This tool has been recommended in the "canard pusher" newsletter. Has anybody any comments on this? Are there any potential problems with picky inspectors? I have this tool and confirm that it does what it's supposed to do. I think it's insane to buy the expensive tool when the less expensive one does the job precisely as well as the more expensive one, it just takes longer. Please note, there is no difference in the resultant swaged cable end whether using the cheap tool or the expensive one, the end result is exactly, repeat, exactly the same. In fact, I borrowed the expensive tool once and had to discard the parts because the owner called me up later and told me that he'd been contacted by the manufacturer and was told that the tool had been improperly manufactured and could produce substandard swages. So the cheap tool worked better than the expensive one. If you tighten the bolts till the two halves of the cheap swaging tool bottom out together, how can the result be any different than the more expensive tool? Corky Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a link to a accident report which involved the use of a nicopress
tool on a cable end that should have been swaged. http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/brief.asp?e...11X15727&key=1 Wayne http://www.soaridaho.com/Schreder "BTIZ" wrote in message news ![]() Corky... the swages must still be checked against a "go - nogo" criteria ... measuring tool.. We had a control cable here that came apart in-flight, swage failed.. a tool was used that had previously been determined to produce substandard swages.. it was kept around for some reason.. another mechanic used it a couple years later on an aircraft and did not check the go/nogo, the aileron cable came apart.. the pilot was able to emergency land in the desert with no major damage.. rudder/elevator only.. the mechanic was fired.. and a letter put in his FAA folder.. BT |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary T. Ciampa" wrote in message ... BTW: As it turns out, the tools from Lowes was NOT, I repeat, NOT sufficient for the nicopress compression sleeves. Sorry about the false advertising! I ended up ordering an aviation approved tool. Regards, Gary What was wrong with it? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Gary T. Ciampa says...
BTW: As it turns out, the tools from Lowes was NOT, I repeat, NOT sufficient for the nicopress compression sleeves. Sorry about the false advertising! I ended up ordering an aviation approved tool. Now you've piqued my curiosity ,I have 2 National Telephone nico tools at my shop ,the expensive ones .One is hand held and the other is a bench mount. I also just bought the $24.95 economy tool from Lowes. In the next day or so I will make up some test cables and compare the pricey ones with the cheap one,and post my results. I also have a go / no go gauge provided with my NT to check all three swages. I have had excellent results with the bolt style swage tool and it will do what my expensive tools will do only slower. It's good for homebuilders but too slow for production. Great for a tool box. See ya Chuck S |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary T. Ciampa wrote:
Gary T. Ciampa wrote: All, This information may be well known but I felt compelled to pass it along. I've been searching for a Nicopress Swaging tool and choking on the prices at the typcial aircraft supply companies. Turns out that Lowes has a Campbell Nicipress tool, 1/16 to 1/8 of an inch for $24.95. The tool is located in the rope,chain and stell cable area. I assume the less expense tool will perform adequately, based on go/no-go verification. Cheers, Gary BTW: As it turns out, the tools from Lowes was NOT, I repeat, NOT sufficient for the nicopress compression sleeves. Sorry about the false advertising! I ended up ordering an aviation approved tool. Regards, Gary I bought one, swaged some sleeves, checked them with Go gage, checked OK what did you find wrong,,,,,,,,,?? -- Mark Smith Tri-State Kite Sales 1121 N Locust St Mt Vernon, IN 47620 1-812-838-6351 http://www.trikite.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:25:09 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote: Corky... the swages must still be checked against a "go - nogo" criteria .. measuring tool.. We had a control cable here that came apart in-flight, swage failed.. a tool was used that had previously been determined to produce substandard swages.. it was kept around for some reason.. another mechanic used it a couple years later on an aircraft and did not check the go/nogo, That's a good story BTIZ, but does not address the point. The point is the cheapo tool works just as well as the expensive tool. Yes, you should always check with a go-no-go guage. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Papco #600 Flaring Tool | Michael Burton | Home Built | 0 | October 27th 03 05:26 PM |
canopy breaking tool? | Russell Duffy | Home Built | 33 | September 30th 03 11:39 PM |