![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Aviation Week & Space Technology 10/27/2003, page 14 Virgin Atlantic Airways plans to use a Scaled Composites aircraft in an attempt next year to complete the first solo nonstop circumnavigation of the globe. The aircraft, dubbed the GlobalFlyer, will be flown by either Steve Fossett or Virgin Atlantic Chairman Richard Branson. Branson is acting as the reserve pilot. The aim is to complete the flight in less than 80 hr. The Burt Rutan-designed, composite-material aircraft has a maximum gross weight of 22,066 lb. and an empty weight of 3,577 lb., which allows for 18,000 lb. of fuel. Wingspan is 114 ft. The GlobalFlyer is powered by a single Williams FJ44-3 turbofan engine. Maximum altitude for the pressurized cockpit aircraft is 52,000 ft. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:01:13 +0000, Dave Hyde wrote:
The clip you posted didn't say, and I haven't gotten this weeks issue yet, but I presume this is also unrefueled? Dave 'vectors to the tanker!' Hyde "Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling." http://www.virginatlanticglobalflyer.com/ -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ e-mail: khorton02(_at_)rogers(_dot_)com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Hyde wrote:
The clip you posted didn't say, and I haven't gotten this weeks issue yet, but I presume this is also unrefueled? Dave 'vectors to the tanker!' Hyde Actually, Dave, the clip I posted was the entire article. To me, though, 18,000 lb of fuel kinda screamed "unrefueled" anyway. I'm sure it did to you as well. The artist's rendering in Aviation Week appeared very Voyager-like so I didn't consider anything but unrefueled until you posed the question. Kevin's link confirms it will be an unrefueled attempt. If the GlobalFlyer performs nominally it will likely be a much easier trip for Fossett or Branson than it was for Dick and Jeana. In my opinion, it will therefore be less of an achievement but still quite interesting technically. The GlobalFlyer will fly above most weather at 45,000 ft. I put together this Voyager/GlobalFlyer comparison using actual performance numbers from the Voyager and nominal numbers for the GlobalFlyer: Voyager GlobalFlyer Wing Span (ft) 110.7 114 Empty Weight (lb) 2,250 3,577 T.O. weight (lb) 9,695 22,066 Useful Load (lb) 7,445 18,489 Fuel (lb) 7,011 18,000 Distance (sm) 26,366 23,000 Flight Time (hr) 216.06 80 Flight Time (days) 9 3.33 Avg Speed (mph) 122.03 287.5 Avg fuel burn rate (lb/hr) 32.36 225 Optimum altitude (ft) 8,000 45,000 Max altitude (ft) 20,500 52,000 David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com P.S. The distance shown for the Voyager is the actual distance flown, not the FAI credited distance. The Voyager average speed is based on the actual distance flown. The max altitude figure for the Voyager is the maximum achieved (over Africa) in an attempt to get above weather. Notice that although it will be a solo attempt, the GlobalFlyer's useful load would allow for two people plus full fuel. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David O wrote:
Dave Hyde wrote: The clip you posted didn't say, and I haven't gotten this weeks issue yet, but I presume this is also unrefueled? Dave 'vectors to the tanker!' Hyde Actually, Dave, the clip I posted was the entire article. To me, though, 18,000 lb of fuel kinda screamed "unrefueled" anyway. A friend of mine logged a .3 while flying an F-111 at 300 feet and Mach ..95 (ingress) and Mach 1.3 (egress) in a Maple Flag exercise in Canada. They burned 20,000+ lbs of go juice. I guess 18,000 lbs screamed "low fuel light" to them. : ) If the GlobalFlyer performs nominally it will likely be a much easier trip for Fossett or Branson than it was for Dick and Jeana. In my opinion, it will therefore be less of an achievement but still quite interesting technically. The GlobalFlyer will fly above most weather at 45,000 ft. I've had an interest in dynamic soaring, where you can extract energy from the boundary of two different air streams (it's how an albatross stays airborne just above the ocean). The ultimate would be to soar the boundary of the jet stream, unpowered. Probably not doable, but never say never. you might be able to extend the range at least this way. Google "dynamic soaring" for more info. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:01:13 GMT, Dave Hyde wrote:
The clip you posted didn't say, and I haven't gotten this weeks issue yet, but I presume this is also unrefueled? Dave 'vectors to the tanker!' Hyde Actually Dave, the article does say: Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling. This is a quote from the article. Corky Scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky Scott wrote:
Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling. Well now the Bunion is confused...... I thought that had already been accomplished by the voyager flight. where did they stop for fuel or what part of the globe did they not fly around. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bernie the Bunion" wrote in message ... Corky Scott wrote: Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling. Well now the Bunion is confused...... I thought that had already been accomplished by the voyager flight. where did they stop for fuel or what part of the globe did they not fly around. The key phrase there was "solo". The Voyager had a crew of two. KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bernie the Bunion wrote:
Corky Scott wrote: Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling. Well now the Bunion is confused...... I thought that had already been accomplished by the voyager flight. All but the "solo" part. where did they stop for fuel or what part of the globe did they not fly around. -- Alex Make the obvious change in the return address to reply by email. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:01:42 GMT, Bernie the Bunion
wrote: Corky Scott wrote: Sir Richard Branson and Steve Fossett announce plans to attempt the world's first non-stop solo flight around the globe without refuelling. Well now the Bunion is confused...... I thought that had already been accomplished by the voyager flight. where did they stop for fuel or what part of the globe did they not fly around. Heh heh, what does the word "solo" mean to Bunion's? Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |