![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As promised, the Luke SATR has appeared in the 201006 edition of the
National Flight Database. Important note: justsoar.com morphs the NFD entry from Restricted type Unspecified/Other to Controlled, Class D. So, to get the SATR in your airspace file(s), you must include the "Class D" in your selections. This transposition is done because the new Part 93 rules for this SATR read just like Class D -- two-way radio communication is required for entry. Straying way off topic, the last day at Region 9 South, we had a young pilot flying a Zuni II in his first contest who lost aileron control at 8000' while still in the start cylinder. He took the time to evaluate the situation carefully, and eventually landed the glider safely at Pinal Airpark (a few miles north of El Tiro) using rudder and elevator only. Nice work Eric! ~ted/2NO |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 17, 3:57*pm, Tuno wrote:
As promised, the Luke SATR has appeared in the 201006 edition of the National Flight Database. I wonder if this means that Garmin will include the SATR area in the next cycle of their databases. The following is extracted from a Deer Valley Airport Pilot's Association brief: SATR Missing in GPS Database - As many of you have already found out, the SATR does not appear in the new Garmin database updates. One of our DVPA members queried Garmin on it not being there and following is the Garmin response --- “The Special Air Traffic Rule that is in effect starting 6 May 10 has been reviewed by our standards department and we will NOT be capturing this area in our database at this time. This area applies to VFR acft operations only and outlines the communication requirements that are needed within this area between VFR operations and Luke Apch Control. Also as you note, this doesn't fit cleanly into any existing SUA type for ARINC.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also as you note, this doesn't fit cleanly into any existing SUA
type for ARINC Yes and no. The ARINC specification provides a "Unspecified/other" category for restricted airspaces, under which the Luke (and other) SATRs are described. For every rule there's going to be exceptions, hence U/O. The Part 93 components are going to be like that -- no doubt why they are in Part 93. Look at the Grand Canyon airspace -- the only Class E on the map you can't fly in. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(USA) SATR additions to airspace files | Tuno | Soaring | 0 | April 22nd 10 03:58 PM |
Self Contained Cambridge FAI Recorder For Sale | ContestID67 | Soaring | 3 | April 6th 07 06:26 PM |
Self Contained Cambridge Recorder For Sale | ContestID67 | Soaring | 0 | February 19th 07 04:55 AM |
Luke AFB | Jose | Piloting | 7 | January 5th 06 12:07 AM |
Portable GPS: receiver and laptop/palm or selft contained unit | picopirate | Owning | 11 | May 16th 04 11:37 PM |