![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anybody tell me what are the typical pressures required to dimple
a skin and also to compress a flush rivet? I know that squeezer tools are rated at typically two to four tons, but what are the actual pressures required? I'm trying to work out the dimensions on a hand operated gantry for dimpling and back-riveting the skins on an RV, and I don't want to over-engineer the thing too much... Thanks, --Max |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Max, go to the Matronics RV-List and you can ask guys that do this everyday.
If you don't know how to get there email me and I well point you in the right direction. Jerry Max Krippler wrote: Can anybody tell me what are the typical pressures required to dimple a skin and also to compress a flush rivet? I know that squeezer tools are rated at typically two to four tons, but what are the actual pressures required? I'm trying to work out the dimensions on a hand operated gantry for dimpling and back-riveting the skins on an RV, and I don't want to over-engineer the thing too much... Thanks, --Max |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Max Krippler wrote:
Can anybody tell me what are the typical pressures required to dimple a skin and also to compress a flush rivet? Forming the shop head will require the same pressure regardless of whether the other end is universal or flush. My experience with using a small hydraulic ram to squeeze MS20470AD4-6 for HP-18 wing box spars is that it took about 3500 psi behind a 1" diameter piston. Given that the area of the piston is (.5")^2*pi = ..785 in^2, the force would have been .785 * 3500 or around 2750 lbs. It might have been a bit less, but I'm pretty sure that's what the neighborhood was. For AD3 rivets, I imagine that the force would be proportionally smaller according to the area of the finished shop head. As for dimpling, I never measured the pressure, but I believe that it's substantially less than required for riveting. I hope that helps some. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 19:23:45 GMT, Max Krippler
wrote: Can anybody tell me what are the typical pressures required to dimple a skin and also to compress a flush rivet? I know that squeezer tools are rated at typically two to four tons, but what are the actual pressures required? I'm trying to work out the dimensions on a hand operated gantry for dimpling and back-riveting the skins on an RV, and I don't want to over-engineer the thing too much... Thanks, --Max until you get a sensible answer... take a piece of dressed soft pine place the rivet hammer on it and pull the trigger. adjust the pressure down until the hammer action fails to mark the pine. that should be just about right. Stealth Pilot |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Stealth Pilot wrote:
...place the rivet hammer on it and pull the trigger... The way I read Max's question, he wants to build a machine for squeezing rivets, not hammering them. That's why I responded as I did in this post: http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&...g.googl e.com (use cut-and-paste if the newsreader breaks the link into multiple lines) Of course, I could have just misread or misunderstood Max's post. My apologies to all if so. Personally, I prefer to squeeze rivets whenever possible, and only hammer them when squeezing is impractical. What I found while riveting the HP box spars is that it is possible to squeeze the rivets using an elaborate set of jigs, rams, and cradles. But the job just went faster when I went ahead and hammered them with my horseshoe-handled 5x. Less pleasant, yes, but faster. And, while I'm on the topic, I just noticed my basic conceptual error in my earlier post cited above: squeezing rivets to a given shop head diameter requires a specific force, not a pressure (which is force exerted over an area). However, that force induces a pressure in the rivet material, since the force required is related to the cross-sectional area of the shop head. Let's have a bit of a look at that. But first, a bit of a warning: *** Warning: I'm not an engineer, and what follows is not engineering advice. It is rather more of a tentative application of high school physics to data found in the Aircraft Spruce catalog. *** Going back to my earlier assertion that it takes about 2750 lbs to set an AD4 rivet, we can compare that with the .025 in^2 area of a .18" dia shop head, and see that the pressure on the shop head is 2750/.025 = ~110000 psi, or about 3 times the 38000 psi tensile strength of the rivet material. That does sound a bit high, so I begin to doubt my memory about how much pressure I had to put behind the 1" dia. ram piston I was using. However, I am confident in my memory that the pressure _was_ on the high side of a 3000 psi pressure gauge; and I'm pretty sure that the guage was accurate to within about 5%. As a for-example, if I was pumping the ram to only 2000 psi to set rivets, the force exerted by the 1" dia piston would have been pi*(.5"^2)*2000 = 1571 lbs. If that's the case, the pressure on the ..18" dia shop head would have been 1571/.025" = ~63000 psi, or about 1.65 times the tensile strength of the rivet material. Somehow that sounds like a more reasonable number. Probably the truth lies between the two values. Anyhow, based on my experience using hydraulics cobbed together from broken bottle jacks, it's an easy enough thing to test. Sorry for rambling so, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Despite all the science, the composition and temper of rivets varies slightly
from batch to batch. With smaller rivets the deviations from the norm are usually not significant but for larger sizes you must fine-tune your equipment to ensure an acceptable shop-head. The numbers give us a handy place to start, as does experience, but if all you have to go on is numbers then it would be wise to lay the books aside and use data from that particular batch of rivets. Which can get a bit tiresome. I think most will agree that one-off fabrication of small airframes remains as much a manual art as a science. -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|