![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given a WWIII scenario. Your out in a hot area with a carrier battle
group. ICBM's are detected and an nuclear exchange is in progress. (not in your immediate area) What would be the immediate tactics a group would do? Since odds are the carrier might soon be disabled or vaporized, do you get every air asset in the air ASAP in a use it or lose it situation? Or do you have everything on standby fueled, armed and ready to launch? Do you group the ships closer together or use more separation? What percentage of a modern carriers planes are normally ready to go? How long would it take to get every flyable plane off the deck? With a normal airborne tanker complement, how many planes could you keep in the air as long as possible? What tactics and weapons would then be used against any possible enemies either in the air, water, or underwater? Do U.S. fast attack subs normally cruise with a carrier battle group? Bob -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:42:03 -0500, Bob Urz
wrote: Given a WWIII scenario. Your out in a hot area with a carrier battle group. ICBM's are detected and an nuclear exchange is in progress. (not in your immediate area) What would be the immediate tactics a group would do? That depends on when this scenario takes place. During the Cold War, carriers were part of SIOP, so the A-6Es would be loaded with nuclear weapons and sent off to bomb somebody. Today, carriers have no such role or weapons. All actions would be defensive in nature. What tactics and weapons would then be used against any possible enemies either in the air, water, or underwater? The same tactics and weapons that would always be used, but with more liberal rules of engagement. Do U.S. fast attack subs normally cruise with a carrier battle group? Currently, yes. -- Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself" "Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today, Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more - http://www.hazegray.org/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Urz" wrote in message ... Given a WWIII scenario. Your out in a hot area with a carrier battle group. ICBM's are detected and an nuclear exchange is in progress. (not in your immediate area) What would be the immediate tactics a group would do? SNIP! SNIP! SNIP! SNIP! SNIP! You take the CBG and run for blue water. In its a surprise and you're in port, you cut the anchor chain and go with what you got. You go even if its with nothing but the carrier, what crew and aircraft are on board. Let the rest (crew members, escorts, and aircraft) catch up as they can. The carrier can defend itself for the short term, and at the very high speed which it will be at, carrier air assets can do a better job than the escorts. But the escorts will have to catch up soon as everything will be needed to protect the carrier. Once you have room to maneuver you are pretty safe from ICBM's and IRBM's launched from shore. You are also in a much better position to defend against air attacks from land bases. (Today they are about the only way you will be attacked by air). Your biggest danger is from weapons fired at you from shorter range. Low flying cruise missiles, short range attack missiles, torpedoes etc. launched from subs, small patrol boats, and low flying aircraft. There is less time to detect and react to them. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 23:26:00 GMT, "Diamond Jim"
wrote: In its a surprise and you're in port, you cut the anchor chain and go with what you got. He said: "Your out in a hot area with a carrier battle group." That pretty much rules out the "in port" scenario. -- Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself" "Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today, Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more - http://www.hazegray.org/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASuW tactics | Dave Anderer | Naval Aviation | 7 | September 7th 04 01:11 AM |
Figter Tactics Academy is back in business | Jarmo Lindberg | Military Aviation | 3 | July 6th 04 10:18 AM |
Mosquito fighter-bomber tactics question | Kari Korpi | Military Aviation | 6 | April 5th 04 09:09 AM |
Were the Tuskeegee Airmen Wrong? | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 63 | February 14th 04 07:38 PM |