![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which A/C in the package launch last? The Prowlers! They have the
most fuel onboard. S-3's, then the E-2's, then Hornets ( the F-18's head straight for the tanker), then Tomcats and last, Prowlers. Of course planeguard is already out there, and maybe if in range, the COD will launch. That sounds different than things I used to hear: Texaco Hoovers before an E-2C? - Shouldn't a Hummer be trying to take the advantage of "clean and less turbulent air" being launched before all the jets, and working hard to reach its orbit on time? It has no refueling probe anyhow, so it should not need Vikings... The short-legged bomb-loaded Hornets do not launch last? - So, I suppose, they "top up" first, and then join the strike package? By the way, using "mission tankers" or "escort tankers" can be a way of tactical deception - especially when they are of similar type as strike a/c. In the era of Libya Raid in 1986 the East block press wrote small ugly comments about a handful of planes which returned to the carriers as a result of technical defects. I believe some of the planes were just airborne reserves (not needed for the strike if nothing bad happens) or KA-6Ds. Best regards, Jacek Zemlo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Taiwanese Dam Strike Old News... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 12 | June 25th 04 05:00 AM |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |
Australia chooses Airbus tankers | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | April 16th 04 10:25 AM |