![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A question for you racing rules makers out the
Does the closed airspace rule (loss of all points plus 100 pt penalty) apply if, following a task abort on course (with enough distance on task to score for the day), a pilot then overflies class C airspace (legally, and in contact with approach, etc), enroute to a safe recovery back at the home base? The question really boils down to: Are you still "on task" after you make a decision to abandon the declared task for reasons of safety - say weather blocking other routes - or to avoid a landout, or both, then legally overfly airspace on the way home? Since the task scoring ends where you abandon the task and assuming you abort outside closed airspace, one could argue that the return flight is the same as an aero retrieve, where the penalty wouldn't apply, since it's perfectly legal and easy to overfly lots of airspace out here in the west. As currently interpreted, this rule makes you potentially fly a riskier and/or longer route when you are probably trying to get home late in the day, which seems counter productive and potentially unsafe. And there is precedent in the airfield landout bonus for rewarding a safer decision over "pushing on regardless". I have no objection to the closed airspace rule while still on task, although the 500 ft minor and 100 ft major violation vertical distances seem a bit draconian and encourage "clock watching" a bit too much - not a good idea if everyone is blasting along under a cloudstreet at 17499'. Perhaps we should look at the FAI rules and see how they handle it? Anyway, enough sniveling... Cheers, Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fed: Planes flying in "commercial" airspace must get GPS | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 66 | June 4th 10 12:54 PM |
(USA) US/Mexico "airspace" (boundary) files available | Tuno | Soaring | 4 | March 27th 10 07:17 PM |
On Sharing airspace with "non-rated UAV "pilots" | vaughn | Piloting | 15 | March 15th 09 04:08 PM |
"Fly Baby, you violated Class B Airspace" | Ron Wanttaja | Piloting | 27 | September 5th 07 08:30 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Connecticut To Get "Creamed" By Airspace Redesign Change? | Free Speaker | General Aviation | 0 | August 8th 06 02:42 PM |