![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In another thread, I asked if the FAA keeps track of FBOs. I
decided to submit that question to the FAA. I received a timely and complete response. You asked if FAA maintains a list of fixed base operators for each airport. The FAA does not. You need to contact the individual airports for this information. It surprises me a bit that they don't know the FBOs are at an airport. Perhaps some other organization (Transportation?) does? I would expect some licensing of fuel facilities. --kyler |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyler Laird wrote in
: It surprises me a bit that they don't know the FBOs are at an airport. Perhaps some other organization (Transportation?) does? I would expect some licensing of fuel facilities. Fuel facilities would be under probably several other agencies. But lots of FBO's don't have fuel. Heck, we're luck the FAA keeps track of airports! [Couldn't prove it, given the rate we keep "losing" airports these days. {:(] ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt any other US Govt agency keeps track of anything relating to
FBOs or anything else other than the physical existence of the airport. Businesses (that's the FBO) are state issues, not Federal. The state worries about taxes (on the fuel and such), safety of fuel, safety of the buildings, etc. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FAA is governed by 49 USC 40113 etc from whence 14 CFR springs, the
beloved FARs. The FAA is mandated to do things in some areas, has discretion in some others, while the remainder are outside the FAA's benevolent sphere. FBOs that have a certificate (141, 142, 135, 125, 121) and so on in the maintenance arena, come under the FAA required work programs. If no certificate then it depends on resources. In my FSDO we do assign ASIs to part 61 operators, the operators like having (1) no certificate, but (2) a single point of contact. However the operator can ignore us as long as nothing goes wrong if they so choose. That extra work does NOT count towards an inspector's "complexity" (work load). As resources dwindle, for example the 2 year hiring freeze in the FAA, more work will be contracted out (see last week's NPRM - where 141, 142 and some other certifications will be delegated outside the FAA) and less discretionary activities will happen. Simon AWP-FSDO-SDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBO's and WiFi | Javier Henderson | General Aviation | 43 | August 30th 03 08:22 AM |