![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Harlow" wrote in message ... Were they of any help other than telling you to "wait for production units"? Seems their customer relations could use a little help. They offered me the "first production unit" by express mail (maybe to arrive this week?, we will see). I offered to be a beta tester so I would have more experience by the time my Oshkosh talk rolls around, but they were not interested. Compared witih the current datalink competition, $50 per month flat rate is actually pretty good or at least competitive. -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And compared to the high cost of a $5000 to $10,000 installation of a storm
scope/ strike finder and its limited information, $50 per month for a wealth of weather data is not that bad! That would cover about 5-10 years worth of monthly fees. And you know the monthly cost will go down as more competition gets in the business. Ronnie Brown |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James M. Knox" wrote in message ... Yeah, but aren't we missing something? Ignoring the fact that I got my stormscope (installed) for a total of around $2800 (which would probably be more like $3200 in 2003 dollars), we still have the capital and installation costs of the XM unit? What does the "aviation FAA PMA 1. There are no installation costs for the XMRadio unit -- it is portable, and unlike the WSI In Flight system, the XMRadio antenna is not permanently installed so it is truly a portable device, just like a handheld GPS. 2. The XMRadio unit should cost notably less as a capital investment than a stormscope -- they are saying under $1000 but the final details are unknown. But really the comparison in price is not to a Stormscope, but rather to panel-mount weather datalink units, where there is no comparison -- say $1000 for XMRadio vs. over $10,000 for most panel-mount weather datalink systems with an MFD. 3. Comparing this to a Stormscope also does no make sense because weather datalink is NOT a replacement for sferics -- sferics is clearly more important and probably more useful than ANY weather datalink system. 4. Lots of pilots rent airplanes or for other reasons fly or instruct in airplanes they do not own. In that case, the XMRadio system seems to have a major portability advantage over most of the competition. 5. It is true that the XMRadio system requires a laptop computer or PDA for its display, but is it really fair to include that in the price considering that many (most?) pilots probably already own a PDA or laptop for other reasons? -- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Integrating onboard weather radar data with satellite-fed Doppler radar | [email protected] | General Aviation | 3 | January 9th 05 08:57 PM |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |
FA: WEATHER FLYING: A PRACTICAL BOOK ON FLYING | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 03 12:07 AM |
XMRadio Satellite Weather Has Arrived | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | September 2nd 03 02:51 PM |
Satellite Radio to broadcast weather data | James M. Knox | Owning | 4 | July 4th 03 06:30 PM |