![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese
hands for full examination (for fuller background, read the below). If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? http://readersupportednews.org/off-s...-online-threat Annals of National Security The Online Threat Should we be worried about a cyber war? by Seymour M. Hersh November 1, 2010 On April 1, 2001, an American EP-3E Aries II reconnaissance plane on an eavesdropping mission collided with a Chinese interceptor jet over the South China Sea, triggering the first international crisis of George W. Bush's Administration. The Chinese jet crashed, and its pilot was killed, but the pilot of the American aircraft, Navy Lieutenant Shane Osborn, managed to make an emergency landing at a Chinese F-8 fighter base on Hainan Island, fifteen miles from the mainland. Osborn later published a memoir, in which he described the "incessant jackhammer vibration" as the plane fell eight thousand feet in thirty seconds, before he regained control. The plane carried twenty-four officers and enlisted men and women attached to the Naval Security Group Command, a field component of the National Security Agency. They were repatriated after eleven days; the plane stayed behind ---- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message...
"a425couple" wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination. If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? What a question. If you are in a head-on collision with another car what are your chances of surviving? I'm sorry you do not like it. They range from 0% to 100%, don't they? The reason I asked it on these newsgroups, is that I thought there might be some who could give historical information to pin it down better than "from 0% to 100%". He was able to control it well enough to fly it 70 miles and land it at an airport (Red Chinese). Have any Orions been 'ditched' i.e. controled landings on water? If he ditched well the thing should have floated long enough for the crew to take to the dinghies. Thereafter it would have been a case of how far away (and how competent) was the rescue. If he made a dog's mess of the ditching they could have all gone down with it. It's a low-wing aircraft so it should ditch fairly well and float well too. Sea-state permitting of course. A reasonably competent pilot should have been able to handle it if he sea was playing along. Eugene L Griessel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 7:37*am, "a425couple" wrote:
"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... *"a425couple" wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination. If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? What a question. *If you are in a head-on collision with another car what are your chances of surviving? * I'm sorry you do not like it. They range from 0% to 100%, don't they? * The reason I asked it on these newsgroups, is that I thought there might be some who could give historical information to pin it down better than "from 0% to 100%". He was able to control it well enough to fly it 70 miles and land it at an airport (Red Chinese). Have any Orions been 'ditched' *i.e. controled landings on water? If he ditched well the thing should have floated long enough for the crew to take to the dinghies. *Thereafter it would have been a case of how far away (and how competent) was the rescue. *If he made a dog's mess of the ditching they could have all gone down with it. It's a low-wing aircraft so it should ditch fairly well and float well too. *Sea-state permitting of course. *A reasonably competent pilot should have been able to handle it if he sea was playing along. Eugene L Griessel- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yes, one did -- all (or nearly all) of the enlisted aircrew died when they went down in the Northern Pacific. The fallout for that event was the requirement that all enlisted aircrews go to survival schools and get some training before they end up in a raft (prior to that, it was possible to bootstrap into aircrew status and not necessarily go through the aircrew pipeline that would include all that). The P-3 is not a very good platform for ditching -- relatively short wings, long tail that would likely pitch you forward if you trying aero-braking in surface effect at the final moment -- I wouldn't do it. Personally, I would have had the crew bail out over land, radio the Chinese that the aircraft was not controllable at slow speeds and aim it for the nearest mountain. Reverse engineering doesn't work well with melted aluminum. During my very limited time on P-3s (14 months), we had one really exciting flight that lasted less than half an hour, trying to get all the way airborne in a 3-engine, overloaded Orion on a 90-degree day. We skimmed the lagoon, flying between ships on our way out to sea, hoping we could get it all in hand. Eventually, we got everything sorted out, but in the meantime, we discussed ditching and ruled it out -- we prepared for ditching but the likelihood was that we wouldn't make it, so it was more "prepare to crash -- get out as best you can and good luck" as opposed to "get the raft after we settle into the water". In a similar situation (balky helicopter nearing the point of falling out of the sky) we had the choice to land on a Soviet aircraft carrier (Novorosiisk) or ditching in the Northern Pacific -- the two pilots voted for landing on the Soviet ship, delivering an intact modern (cof) ASW helo into our enemies hands. My rather loud dissenting vote was that we should crash it into the bridge of the Novoro (we had intel that Admiral Gorchkov was on board - the modern era's version of Admiral Doenitz or Isoroku Yamamoto), or anything else but to give it to the damn Russians. Fate intervened -- our tiny frigate realized we were off the radio and likely in trouble and had doubled back to reach us. We got aboard, barely, and the helicopter never flew again. Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. I was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. v/r Gordon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eugene Griessel" wrote in message...
"a425couple" wrote: "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... "a425couple" wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination. If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? What a question. If you are in a head-on collision with another car what are your chances of surviving? I'm sorry you do not like it. They range from 0% to 100%, don't they? The reason I asked it on these newsgroups, is that I thought there might be some who could give historical information to pin it down better than "from 0% to 100%". Explain how anyone could do that? No matter how many prior successful ditchings have occurred you have no way of knowing the one you are heading into will be survivable. You can console yourself with prior statistics until you are blue in the face but you will not know until you either survive or otherwise. Each ditching is in a way unique - just as most crash-landings are. People have walked away from mangled twisted burning wreckage without a crease in their trousers and others have been killed when the aircraft appears undamaged. I recall a Spitfire making a controlled wheels down "crash-landing" on a long stretch of sandy beach due to engine failure. Ideal, but at the very last the thing tipped up - and the pilot having loosened his harness for a quick getout was thrown out of the cockpit and his head contacted the only rock in 1/2 a mile in any direction. Those days they still wore leather helmets otherwise he might have survived. The aircraft was righted, the engine problem repaired and it was flown back to base - not even the prop was damaged. The pilot however had a load of mush in a leather helmet where his head used to be. He was able to control it well enough to fly it 70 miles and land it at an airport (Red Chinese). Have any Orions been 'ditched' i.e. controled landings on water? Is something else going on with you today Eugene? (From reading a question to launching a criticism in 12 minutes!?) Explain how anyone could do that? Odds and probabilities. That is how most of us make many decisions each and every day. Yes, every action MIGHT result in disaster. But we still get out and do things. But we do try to do things in a reasonable manner to increase the odds of a reasonable outcome. And this is even more important when something has already gone badly wrong. Even with your logic, and example. By the same token Osborn trying to land at the airport could have gone very wrong and killed everyone. He considered odds and probabilities. What likely were some of the prior facts that he considered in his calculations? { 'No matter how many prior successful * * insert choice of sail boatings / sports car races / vacations / rock climbs have occurred you have no way of knowing the one you are heading into will be survivable. You can console yourself with prior statistics until you are blue in the face but you will not know until you either survive or otherwise.' } |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gordon" wrote in message...
- "a425couple" wrote: - "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... - "a425couple" wrote: - In 2001 a US (big snip) -Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- -but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would -obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort -must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. I -was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. -v/r Gordon Thank you Gordon. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Oct, 16:31, Gordon wrote:
On Oct 28, 7:37*am, "a425couple" wrote: "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... *"a425couple" wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination. If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? What a question. *If you are in a head-on collision with another car what are your chances of surviving? * I'm sorry you do not like it. They range from 0% to 100%, don't they? * The reason I asked it on these newsgroups, is that I thought there might be some who could give historical information to pin it down better than "from 0% to 100%". He was able to control it well enough to fly it 70 miles and land it at an airport (Red Chinese). Have any Orions been 'ditched' *i.e. controled landings on water? If he ditched well the thing should have floated long enough for the crew to take to the dinghies. *Thereafter it would have been a case of how far away (and how competent) was the rescue. *If he made a dog's mess of the ditching they could have all gone down with it. It's a low-wing aircraft so it should ditch fairly well and float well too. *Sea-state permitting of course. *A reasonably competent pilot should have been able to handle it if he sea was playing along. Eugene L Griessel- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yes, one did -- all (or nearly all) of the enlisted aircrew died when they went down in the Northern Pacific. *The fallout for that event was the requirement that all enlisted aircrews go to survival schools and get some training before they end up in a raft (prior to that, it was possible to bootstrap into aircrew status and not necessarily go through the aircrew pipeline that would include all that). The P-3 is not a very good platform for ditching -- relatively short wings, long tail that would likely pitch you forward if you trying aero-braking in surface effect at the final moment -- *I wouldn't do it. *Personally, I would have had the crew bail out over land, radio the Chinese that the aircraft was not controllable at slow speeds and aim it for the nearest mountain. *Reverse engineering doesn't work well with melted aluminum. During my very limited time on P-3s (14 months), we had one really exciting flight that lasted less than half an hour, trying to get all the way airborne in a 3-engine, overloaded Orion on a 90-degree day. We skimmed the lagoon, flying between ships on our way out to sea, hoping we could get it all in hand. * Eventually, we got everything sorted out, but in the meantime, we discussed ditching and ruled it out -- we prepared for ditching but the likelihood was that we wouldn't make it, so it was more "prepare to crash -- get out as best you can and good luck" as opposed to "get the raft after we settle into the water". In a similar situation (balky helicopter nearing the point of falling out of the sky) we had the choice to land on a Soviet aircraft carrier (Novorosiisk) or ditching in the Northern Pacific -- the two pilots voted for landing on the Soviet ship, delivering an intact modern (cof) ASW helo into our enemies hands. *My rather loud dissenting vote was that we should crash it into the bridge of the Novoro *(we had intel that Admiral Gorchkov was on board - the modern era's version of Admiral Doenitz or Isoroku Yamamoto), or anything else but to give it to the damn Russians. * Fate intervened -- our tiny frigate realized we were off the radio and likely in trouble and had doubled back to reach us. *We got aboard, barely, and the helicopter never flew again. Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. *I was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. v/r Gordon- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fascinating Gordon, thank you, However it leads to another question, how easy is it to bale out of a P-3, especially the last man out? Guy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:44:33 -0700, "a425couple"
wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination (for fuller background, read the below). If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? There have been at least two P-3 ditchings. One was in the North Pacific after a "prop fails to feather" emergency (a VERY serious failure in a P-3). They frequently lead to engine fires, which is what happened here. http://www.vpnavy.com/vp9586.html I did not, in quick search, find a the story but I'm sure some time with Google will turn it up. It was written up at least in APPROACH in years past. One was in the Gulf: http://www.vpnavy.com/vp47ditch.html Ditching at sea is a very dicey proposition if the aircraft is undamaged and easily controlable. With major airframe damage it's not something I'd look forward to. Further, the A/C did not KNOW what his status actually was. For all he knew a wing was going to fall off without much warning. So picking even a potentially hostile airfield was probably the wisest choice under the circumstances. An ASW crew is smaller than an ELINT crew so there is the question of egress. The P-3 is a nice aircraft to fly with boosted controlls. Boost out it's a real chore to keep it under control. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 10:56*am, "a425couple" wrote:
"Gordon" wrote in message... - "a425couple" wrote: - "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... - "a425couple" wrote: - In 2001 a US (big snip) -Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- -but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would -obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort -must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. *I -was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. -v/r Gordon Thank you Gordon. Which is why you tey to destroy as much as you can as they did. most secret stuff first. Like when the U boat gets the surrender order to the merchantman. once the captain shows up, its where is the codebook and log, pretty much standard answer was, those went over the side when you surfaced. They should have only had current code cards for the encryption gear, most of the rest is, lets get our frustrations out on the government issued equipment. Supposedly we did learn from USS Pueblo where way too much COMSEC stuff was packed into that boat. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 11:11*am, guy wrote:
On 28 Oct, 16:31, Gordon wrote: On Oct 28, 7:37*am, "a425couple" wrote: "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... *"a425couple" wrote: In 2001 a US reconisance plane fell into Chinese hands for full examination. If pilot Osburn had tried to fly as far as he could toward an 'authorized' airport and had to 'ditch' in the open ocean, what were the chances of the 24 crew surviving? What a question. *If you are in a head-on collision with another car what are your chances of surviving? * I'm sorry you do not like it. They range from 0% to 100%, don't they? * The reason I asked it on these newsgroups, is that I thought there might be some who could give historical information to pin it down better than "from 0% to 100%". He was able to control it well enough to fly it 70 miles and land it at an airport (Red Chinese). Have any Orions been 'ditched' *i.e. controled landings on water? If he ditched well the thing should have floated long enough for the crew to take to the dinghies. *Thereafter it would have been a case of how far away (and how competent) was the rescue. *If he made a dog's mess of the ditching they could have all gone down with it. It's a low-wing aircraft so it should ditch fairly well and float well too. *Sea-state permitting of course. *A reasonably competent pilot should have been able to handle it if he sea was playing along. Eugene L Griessel- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yes, one did -- all (or nearly all) of the enlisted aircrew died when they went down in the Northern Pacific. *The fallout for that event was the requirement that all enlisted aircrews go to survival schools and get some training before they end up in a raft (prior to that, it was possible to bootstrap into aircrew status and not necessarily go through the aircrew pipeline that would include all that). The P-3 is not a very good platform for ditching -- relatively short wings, long tail that would likely pitch you forward if you trying aero-braking in surface effect at the final moment -- *I wouldn't do it. *Personally, I would have had the crew bail out over land, radio the Chinese that the aircraft was not controllable at slow speeds and aim it for the nearest mountain. *Reverse engineering doesn't work well with melted aluminum. During my very limited time on P-3s (14 months), we had one really exciting flight that lasted less than half an hour, trying to get all the way airborne in a 3-engine, overloaded Orion on a 90-degree day. We skimmed the lagoon, flying between ships on our way out to sea, hoping we could get it all in hand. * Eventually, we got everything sorted out, but in the meantime, we discussed ditching and ruled it out -- we prepared for ditching but the likelihood was that we wouldn't make it, so it was more "prepare to crash -- get out as best you can and good luck" as opposed to "get the raft after we settle into the water". In a similar situation (balky helicopter nearing the point of falling out of the sky) we had the choice to land on a Soviet aircraft carrier (Novorosiisk) or ditching in the Northern Pacific -- the two pilots voted for landing on the Soviet ship, delivering an intact modern (cof) ASW helo into our enemies hands. *My rather loud dissenting vote was that we should crash it into the bridge of the Novoro *(we had intel that Admiral Gorchkov was on board - the modern era's version of Admiral Doenitz or Isoroku Yamamoto), or anything else but to give it to the damn Russians. * Fate intervened -- our tiny frigate realized we were off the radio and likely in trouble and had doubled back to reach us. *We got aboard, barely, and the helicopter never flew again. Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. *I was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. v/r Gordon- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fascinating Gordon, thank you, However it leads to another question, how easy is it to bale out of a P-3, especially the last man out? Guy Ideally, its straight and level then set the autopilot. realistically, it all depends. even if you have an ejection seat, if you're out of parameters, you're a goner. They probably would have had no problems, but in a flyable airplane, much safer to land. You could have chute problems, separation during bailout, drown getting out of the chute. Its like throwing a pass in football, 2 out of 3 things that could happen are bad. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a425couple wrote:
"Gordon" wrote in message... - "a425couple" wrote: - "Eugene Griessel" wrote in message... - "a425couple" wrote: - In 2001 a US (big snip) -Ultimately, the pilot has responsibility for the safety of his crew -- -but when it involves spyplanes or other strategic assets that would -obviously help the enemy, crews should understand that every effort -must be made to keep those aircraft out of the hands of the enemy. I -was appalled by the EP-3 pilots decision to land in China.. -v/r Gordon Thank you Gordon. I took the liberty of looking up Gordon's website: www.oldboldpilots.org Some really good reading, including bios, there. Lots of distinguished members too. - nilita |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PanAm flt943 ditching | Private | Piloting | 0 | February 18th 09 06:26 AM |
Information on Ditching | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 2 | May 5th 05 02:19 AM |
Ditching at Sea | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 5 | November 17th 03 09:58 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 18 | October 7th 03 10:27 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 6 | October 6th 03 04:39 PM |