![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the
decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 6:14*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee Well done. Thanks guys. We appreciate the detail. -Evan Ludeman / T8 (...hoping to be flying with PowerFlarm at Perry) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 6:14*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee Again, thanks and well done, Best Regards, Dave "YO electric" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well done.
Paul Remde "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote in message ... The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow - a severe outbreak of common sense seems to have overtaken the
committee! Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 9:29*pm, Mike the Strike wrote:
Wow - a severe outbreak of common sense seems to have overtaken the committee! Mike Outbreak of common sense.. ok I would like to entertain the idea of the SSA doing something for all the SSA members. I noticed there is a discount for group buying of the new USA FLARMS. Why is it that the SSA Director has not conducted negotiations with the FLARM manufacturer and created an opportunity for all the SSA members to receive a discount through an "SSA FLARM GROUP PURCHASE" ? Seems to me that might be a real win win for all involved. Members might be able to purchase the units for $1,000 or so... But I might be expecting too much of the SSA. So as a member of a small club I'll have to decide if the cost is worth it... Oh I do intend to purchase a FLARM myself. Steve S9 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/16/2010 7:42 PM, Stephen wrote:
On Nov 16, 9:29 pm, Mike the wrote: Wow - a severe outbreak of common sense seems to have overtaken the committee! Mike Outbreak of common sense.. ok I would like to entertain the idea of the SSA doing something for all the SSA members. I noticed there is a discount for group buying of the new USA FLARMS. Why is it that the SSA Director has not conducted negotiations with the FLARM manufacturer and created an opportunity for all the SSA members to receive a discount through an "SSA FLARM GROUP PURCHASE" ? Seems to me that might be a real win win for all involved. Members might be able to purchase the units for $1,000 or so... But I might be expecting too much of the SSA. So as a member of a small club I'll have to decide if the cost is worth it... Oh I do intend to purchase a FLARM myself. I suggest you ask your Regional director. It might be something simple like "The PowerFlarm company won't do it that way". From the Craggy Aero site, the group purchase requirements are... * A group does not need to be an officially sanctioned club by the SSA. * Generally, a local club operating on an airfield is our model. * **The group needs to be based at one airfield* *so that the benefit is appreciated by the participants. Regardless, your director will know the answer or can easily get it for you. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl - "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am 17.11.2010 04:55, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:42 PM, Stephen wrote: On Nov 16, 9:29 pm, Mike the wrote: Wow - a severe outbreak of common sense seems to have overtaken the committee! Mike Outbreak of common sense.. ok I would like to entertain the idea of the SSA doing something for all the SSA members. I noticed there is a discount for group buying of the new USA FLARMS. Why is it that the SSA Director has not conducted negotiations with the FLARM manufacturer and created an opportunity for all the SSA members to receive a discount through an "SSA FLARM GROUP PURCHASE" ? Seems to me that might be a real win win for all involved. Members might be able to purchase the units for $1,000 or so... But I might be expecting too much of the SSA. So as a member of a small club I'll have to decide if the cost is worth it... Oh I do intend to purchase a FLARM myself. I suggest you ask your Regional director. It might be something simple like "The PowerFlarm company won't do it that way". From the Craggy Aero site, the group purchase requirements are... * A group does not need to be an officially sanctioned club by the SSA. * Generally, a local club operating on an airfield is our model. * **The group needs to be based at one airfield* *so that the benefit is appreciated by the participants. Regardless, your director will know the answer or can easily get it for you. In Germany we get rebates of 5% / 10% / 15% for group orders of 6+ / 10+ / 20+ FLARM units. You don't have to be a formal group like a club, an informal group of individuals will do fine. Normally, someone puts a small ad on the website of segeflug.de, seeking for other people wanting to join in to get a better rebate. This works well since several years, and by this method I got my FLARM for my newly purchased glider for a reasonable price. -- Peter Scholz ASW24 JE |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 03:18 17 November 2010, Paul Remde wrote:
Well done. Paul Remde "John Godfrey (QT)" wrote in message ... The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee While I am not directly concerned as I am a competition director in the UK I am concerned with one aspect of FLARM in competitions; 4. Stealth or other restrictions. We are not imposing stealth or other restrictions at this time. We may impose restrictions later, and may do so on a contest by contest basis. Current UK rules do require stealth restrictions during competitions and as a director I am uncomfortable with this on two main grounds. The first is that the use of STEALTH mode degrades the performance of an instrument which is designed to enhance flight safety. While it is fine for an individual pilot to make a decision to do that I am extremely uncomfortable with requiring someone to degrade a unit and therefore safety. I am pretty sure that even a British court would take a very dim view of that were there to be an accident. Whether a court would find me personally liable I have no way of knowing and given the only way of finding out I prefer to remain ignorant. The other concern is that the requirement is un-enforcable. FLARM is an open technology and while it is possible to check an instrument installed in the glider it is not possible to check and undeclared FLARM unit carried by the pilot, searching pilots before they get into their glider is not likely to ever be acceptable. It is comparatively easy to have a non--stealth unit available. A rule that cannot be enforced should never be made. Personally I prefer the route you have taken at the moment, accept that those with FLARM may receive an advantage from it's use. This alone may encourage pilots to fit FLARM and if everyone has it the playing field is at least level. In my opinion it would be unwise, given the nature of your courts, to mandate the use of stealth mode. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 4:14*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: The USA Rules Committee has published a document detailing the decisions taken and background relating to Flarm usage in 2011 USA contests. The document can be accessed via the link below: http://www.ssa.org/files/member/2011FlarmUSA.pdf For the committee, John Godfrey (QT) USA Rules Committee Thanks to all of you that took the time to consider this and to prepare the report. Andy (GY) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLC 2011 | dhaluza | Soaring | 12 | October 22nd 10 12:02 AM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | robert hunter | Soaring | 23 | October 21st 10 11:34 PM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 9 | October 17th 10 03:41 AM |
2011 15M Nationals | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 10 | August 19th 10 05:23 PM |
2011 USA 18M Nationals | 5 ugly | Soaring | 3 | August 18th 10 04:52 AM |