![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The service manual for my 1968 Cessna 320F says the vacuum regulators should be set with the engines at 1700 RPM. If you want to set the right regulator it says to idle the left engine and set power on the right engine to 1700 RPM. At this power setting you should have 5" of suction on the vacuum gage. After doing this for both sides it says to run both engines up to 1700 RPM and you should get 5" +-.25". I am getting 5" on each side at 1700 RPM per the service manual, so it would appear all is OK, however my suction readings are not passing the limits prescribed in POH/Owner's Manual supplement D53317-1-13. This supplement says after starting the first engine, with throttle set at 1000 RPM the suction gage should read in the green arc or 4.50" to 5.25". I'm getting about 2" of suction, but the failure button is sucked in. This is the same for each engine. So my failure buttons are working correctly according to the supplements procedures, but I am no where near being in the green arc, with only one engine running at 1000 RPM. With one or both engines running at least 1700 RPM I get 5" of suction and with both engines running at 1000 RPM I get 3.5" of suction, but with only one engine running at 1000 RPM I get around 2" of suction. Each failure button is sucked in with the engines running and if only one engine is running only one failure button is sucked in. The vacuum pumps are Airborne dry pumps p/n 242CW. I just had the vacuum manifold p/n 1H5-1 replaced which didn't fix this problem. Why would my suction be OK at 1700 RPM and above, but be low at low RPM? The regulators are p/n 2H3-8 and -9. Both regulators are probably the same age and time on them, is it possible both are bad or is it more likely a leak in one of the hoses between the manifold and instruments? Is there a way to pressurize the system to check for leaks? How can this best be accomplished? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chad Lemmen" wrote
With one or both engines running at least 1700 RPM I get 5" of suction and with both engines running at 1000 RPM I get 3.5" of suction, but with only one engine running at 1000 RPM I get around 2" of suction. First thing to check is that both regulators are closing completely at low rpm. Simple way to check is to temporarily cover their relief intake screens with duct tape. If this increases vacuum at idle, that's the answer. If the regulators haven't been disassembled and cleaned in years, then accumulated dust/gunk around the regulator's valve seat can prevent it from sealing shut. Remove the regulator, tap the wrist pin out to disassemble, give it a good scrubbing in Stoddard solvent, dry, reassemble and reinstall. Valve should then close and seal completely at idle. Second thing is to check all vac hoses and fittings for cracks. Rubber hoses have a nominal 10 year life. Nylon fittings get brittle with age, and become prone to cracking after perhaps 20 years. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wet vs Dry Vacuum Pump | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | December 15th 04 05:17 PM |
Windmilling Prop & Vacuum Pump | Matt Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | October 14th 04 08:08 PM |
Wet Vacuum Pumps | DBlumel | Home Built | 4 | August 19th 04 08:27 AM |
Newbie Question - Vacuum vs Electric | Bill Denton | Aerobatics | 1 | April 15th 04 11:30 PM |
Fiberglass Vacuum Bagging Technique...Resin Infusion | Steve | Home Built | 5 | August 8th 03 06:10 PM |