![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, all, for your insight and guidance on hangars, TBO, etc I've asked
lately. Now I have another one for you. I know that you should always get a disinterested 3rd party A&P to do the prepurchase, but, suppose I find an airplane for sale at my existing home airport, and the current owner's A&P is also based there? If I intend to use the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? Thanks; - or am I thinking too hard? Carl |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Carl Orton" said:
prepurchase, but, suppose I find an airplane for sale at my existing home airport, and the current owner's A&P is also based there? If I intend to use the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? We've had pre-purchase inspections done by the guy who did the owner's regular maintenance work, but we've also been using this guy for our 5 plane fleet for dozens of years, so we had no doubt of his loyalty to us. I wouldn't put him in a me or him situation with only one aircraft on the line, though. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "real programmers don't really understand why they get paid for doing stuff they'd do in their spare time anyway; if they're smart, they never let -that- out." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Carl Orton" wrote in message
... Thanks, all, for your insight and guidance on hangars, TBO, etc I've asked lately. Now I have another one for you. I know that you should always get a disinterested 3rd party A&P to do the prepurchase, but, suppose I find an airplane for sale at my existing home airport, and the current owner's A&P is also based there? If I intend to use the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? Thanks; - or am I thinking too hard? My opinion - do not do it. Get a fresh set of eyes to look over the airplane. For the A&P/IA on the field to give an opinion of an aircraft he maintains, what would you expect? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Carl Orton wrote: the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? It's not just a question of loyalty or honesty. You need someone with no preconceptions to look at the plane. New eyes will find things that have been habitually overlooked. You also want to know about things that aren't airworthiness issues *now* but will be soon. If the current owner has been leaning on the IA to sign off on some marginal items he may have mentally refiled those into "later" and forget to mention them to you. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the same reasons, does it make sense to use a different A&P for your annual
every once in a while? I've been considering doing my annual with another A&P next year to make sure nothing has been habitually overlooked. I plan to hang onto my airplane for many years, so I want to know if something is not up to snuff before it becomes a major issue. Seems to me that if the same guy looks at the plane all the time he'll start to overlook stuff that might have been slowly deteriorating. Ben Jackson wrote: In article , Carl Orton wrote: the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? It's not just a question of loyalty or honesty. You need someone with no preconceptions to look at the plane. New eyes will find things that have been habitually overlooked. You also want to know about things that aren't airworthiness issues *now* but will be soon. If the current owner has been leaning on the IA to sign off on some marginal items he may have mentally refiled those into "later" and forget to mention them to you. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every time you switch A&Ps, they look at your first annual like it is their
chance to buy a new set of Snap-On tool chests. It will be double or triple what your second, third, etc. annual with your previous mechanic would have been. This is a well-known phenomenon. Your plane will be meticulously maintained though. "Ray Andraka" wrote in message ... For the same reasons, does it make sense to use a different A&P for your annual every once in a while? I've been considering doing my annual with another A&P next year to make sure nothing has been habitually overlooked. I plan to hang onto my airplane for many years, so I want to know if something is not up to snuff before it becomes a major issue. Seems to me that if the same guy looks at the plane all the time he'll start to overlook stuff that might have been slowly deteriorating. Ben Jackson wrote: In article , Carl Orton wrote: the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? It's not just a question of loyalty or honesty. You need someone with no preconceptions to look at the plane. New eyes will find things that have been habitually overlooked. You also want to know about things that aren't airworthiness issues *now* but will be soon. If the current owner has been leaning on the IA to sign off on some marginal items he may have mentally refiled those into "later" and forget to mention them to you. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Vadek" wrote in message
news:fHKeb.10637$%h1.7669@sccrnsc02... I know that you should always get a disinterested 3rd party A&P to do the prepurchase, but, suppose I find an airplane for sale at my existing home airport, and the current owner's A&P is also based there? If I intend to use the same A&P for future annuals, what's the harm if he does the prepurchase, especially if I tell him that up front? Thanks; - or am I thinking too hard? My opinion - do not do it. Get a fresh set of eyes to look over the airplane. For the A&P/IA on the field to give an opinion of an aircraft he maintains, what would you expect? Agreed. I would *strongly* recommend a 3rd party. Then use the same guy for you maintenance. You won't regret it - you may the other way around. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm kind of in a similar pickle in as much as a plane I take care of is up
for sale. To whom do I owe my loyalty? If I point out every little defect, the owner who I've known for a fair amount of time will say "That S.O.B. stuck it to me I thought he was my friend" On the other hand if I don't volunteer some defect, then the new owner will say "That S.O.B. stuck it to me I thought he was an honest mechanic" I handle it by telling the prospective buyer to get a third party. Cheers: paul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a very rare, unordinary situation, you might find that the A&P who
had been servicing the aircraft all along to be a good one for the prepurchase. Mine was one of these rare occasions. The story goes that the A&P's father first bought this airplane learned to fly in it, then passed it down to his oldest son who learned to fly in it, who then passed it down to the younger son, who also learned to fly in it and later became this A&P/IA and the owner of an FBO. He sold the plane to a local flying club and then was pretty much the exclusive maintainer of it for the next 13 years after that. I had him do a full prepurchase/annual inspection and everything seemed good so I bought it. He showed me every nook and cranny of the plane and explained every nuance it had to me in detail. The morning I flew it away, he asked to fly it one more time and I could tell that he was on the verge of getting emotional to see it fly away from "home" for the last time. Someday, if my economic situation wouldn't stink so bad, I'd wish I could give the Checkerbird a new paintjob (same orange and white checkers, of course) and interior and fly her back up to Iowa just to show her off. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neal wrote in message . ..
In a very rare, unordinary situation, you might find that the A&P who had been servicing the aircraft all along to be a good one for the prepurchase. Not as rare as you would think. A lot is going to depend on exactly what aircraft you are looking at. Something that is very common, such as the 150/152/172 series or the Cherokees', there are hundreds of people that can and do work on them. When you start talking about rare/antique/warbirds, you really narrow the field of people that are qualified to work on them. With these aircraft, I'd rather go through them with the person that has been doing the maintenance instead of handing the aircraft to someone that is qualified on paper, but has little or no practical experience with the model in question. A pre-buy inspection is no place to spend your bucks paying for a mechanic to get trained on a particular model. You leave yourself open to possible problems down the road with overlooked items due to excessive familarity, but you will find that those type mechanics quickly earn a bad rep in the trade. Craig C. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |