![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca
III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A realistic range with full fuel is about 500 - 600nm. You can go
further with a very economy power setting, but somebody's bladder won't last as long as the fuel. As with most light aircraft, with full fuel, six occupants, and the usual baggage, you will be overgross at takeoff. Best regards, Steve Robertson Former Piper employee and Seneca III pilot Mark wrote: Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not sure about the Seneca III, but with the Seneca II, you can either
fill the seats or fill the tanks.. can't do both.. and those in the way back seats better be kids.. BT "Mark" wrote in message m... Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fly a Seneca V but I don’t expect much difference between the
III and the V except the empty weight. I can legally carry about 1,000 lbs. Of people, fuel or some combination. With a burn rate of about 24 gph you figure how the desired balance within the limitations. (Mark) wrote in message om... Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Piper lists the useful load at 1337 lb
http://www.newpiper.com/fleet/spec_s...ew/senecaV.pdf Mike MU-2 "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... (M.E. Borner) wrote in message . com... I fly a Seneca V but I don’t expect much difference between the III and the V except the empty weight. I can legally carry about 1,000 lbs. Of people, fuel or some combination. With a burn rate of about 24 gph you figure how the desired balance within the limitations. (Mark) wrote in message om... Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? Is the useful load on a Seneca V really ~1000lbs? That's nearly 700lbs less than a II. I know the interiors/air condition/avionics can take up weight but that's obscene. -Nathan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 1,000 is an approximation used for "back of the envelope"
calculations on max. gross weight. In actuality on my A/C the basic empty weight is 3576.5 lbs. and the max. gross wt. is 4750 lbs. leaving 1173.5 lbs. useful load (10% margin of error between the book figures and the estimated figures). You also need to remember that the zero fuel weight is about 300 lbs. below the max. gross. not that that is really an issue because you can't go too far on less than 50 ga. so you would not likely hit that limitation. The 1337 lbs. on the Piper website probably does not count certain options. Oxygen? Addit'l. avionics? These figures that limit the carrying capacity are a real shame. I would expect that in fact the A/C can carry way over these limits but since it would raise the stall speed over the max. for the utility category the max. gross was lowered for certification. Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... Piper lists the useful load at 1337 lb http://www.newpiper.com/fleet/spec_s...ew/senecaV.pdf Mike MU-2 "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... (M.E. Borner) wrote in message . com... I fly a Seneca V but I don’t expect much difference between the III and the V except the empty weight. I can legally carry about 1,000 lbs. Of people, fuel or some combination. With a burn rate of about 24 gph you figure how the desired balance within the limitations. (Mark) wrote in message om... Can anybody tell me what a realistic cruising range is for a Seneca III with long range tanks a a full load (i.e. six people including pilot)? Is the useful load on a Seneca V really ~1000lbs? That's nearly 700lbs less than a II. I know the interiors/air condition/avionics can take up weight but that's obscene. -Nathan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "M.E. Borner" wrote in message m... These figures that limit the carrying capacity are a real shame. I would expect that in fact the A/C can carry way over these limits but since it would raise the stall speed over the max. for the utility category the max. gross was lowered for certification. Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... I didn't know that there was a max stall speed for multi engine aircraft. What is it? Raising gross weight is normally not as simple as writing a larger number in the book. There are many potential issues, climb rate, single engine performance and strength among them. We can be assured that the designers gave us as high a gross weight allowance as they dared.. Mike MU-2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 29 | August 31st 04 04:20 AM |
What is missile defense? An expensive fraud Bush needs Poland as a future nuclear battlefield | Paul J. Adam | Military Aviation | 1 | August 9th 04 08:29 PM |
Is replacing Maverick with JCM a good idea? | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 12 | June 16th 04 10:07 PM |
Helicopter gun at LONG range | Tony Williams | Naval Aviation | 3 | August 20th 03 02:14 AM |
To Steal an F-86 | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 19 | August 1st 03 02:26 AM |