![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a retractable single (R182). I have lots of hours. My insurance (1
Mil Smooth + 120 K Hull value) is $1800. The previous thread here (Light Twins - How Soft???) showed insurance rates for light twins (1 Mil Smooth + 85 K Hull value) with lots of hours at about $2800. There is only one reason for this disparity in price. The insurance companies only care about their wallets. They are not emotionally involved owners. The light twins crash more often. If they crashed less, the insurance rates would be lower. It is not the number of passengers, BTW. A quick look through NTSB statistics shows only a few fatal crashes with 4 passengers, and many of those are singles. A great irony, isn't it? DB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diesel aircraft engines and are the light jets pushing out the twins? | [email protected] | General Aviation | 52 | October 7th 04 03:14 AM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
The light bulb | Greasy Rider | Military Aviation | 6 | March 2nd 04 12:07 PM |
More on High Performance Insurance | Jay Honeck | Owning | 25 | December 15th 03 03:24 AM |
Light Twins. How soft??? | Montblack | Owning | 19 | December 3rd 03 10:38 PM |