![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I look for older Cessna 172 models, I have noticed that there doesn't
seem to be any in the 1987 to 1996 range for sale. Did Cessna not build any during these years? David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I look for older Cessna 172 models, I have noticed that there doesn't
seem to be any in the 1987 to 1996 range for sale. Did Cessna not build any during these years? Correct. Liability suits were killing them. I understand that their reason for moving baqck into GA piston singles was a change to the statute of limitations. Tony -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Almost Instrument ![]() Cessna 172H C-GICE |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article nospam-F0BE06.18040312022004@shawnews, tony roberts
wrote: When I look for older Cessna 172 models, I have noticed that there doesn't seem to be any in the 1987 to 1996 range for sale. Did Cessna not build any during these years? Correct. Liability suits were killing them. I understand that their reason for moving baqck into GA piston singles was a change to the statute of limitations. General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996. Removed liability for parts and products more than 18 years old. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "EDR" wrote in message General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996. Removed liability for parts and products more than 18 years old. THIS is considered a "revitalization"? What was the limit before that? 200 years? Geez. -- Jim Fisher |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:15:11 -0600, "Jim Fisher"
wrote: "EDR" wrote in message General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996. Removed liability for parts and products more than 18 years old. THIS is considered a "revitalization"? What was the limit before that? 200 years? No, longer. As in "forever." Heck, there's a move afoot to penalize some (non-aviation) US companies for their actions over 150 years ago... Ron Wanttaja |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() CFLav8r wrote: Did Cessna not build any during these years? That's correct. George Patterson A diplomat is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you look forward to the trip. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CFLav8r" wrote in message m...
When I look for older Cessna 172 models, I have noticed that there doesn't seem to be any in the 1987 to 1996 range for sale. Did Cessna not build any during these years? Correct. And all of the (few) 1986 models were just 1985 models that took more than a year to unload. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Fisher" wrote in message . .. | | "EDR" wrote in message | General Aviation Revitalization Act of 1996. | Removed liability for parts and products more than 18 years old. | | THIS is considered a "revitalization"? What was the limit before that? 200 | years? | | Geez. Smith & Wesson has been successfully sued for "defective" handguns manufactured by predecessor companies during the Civil War. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "CFLav8r" wrote in message ... | When I look for older Cessna 172 models, I have noticed that there doesn't | seem to be any in the 1987 to 1996 range for sale. | Did Cessna not build any during these years? Cessna built no single engine aircraft during those years. Liability insurance, which is a large part of the manufacturing cost of an airplane, had driven the cost up so high that there was virtually no demand. Cessna and other manufacturers said they would not build any more planes until there was some kind of liability reform. The Aviation Revitalization Act limited aviation product liability to 20 years from the date of manufacture, so Cessna and others started building planes again. The tort lawyers have made several unsuccessful (so far) attempts to break the 20 year limit. If they ever do succeed, the manufacturers will probably quit for good. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Cessna built no single engine aircraft during those years. Liability insurance, which is a large part of the manufacturing cost of an airplane, had driven the cost up so high that there was virtually no demand. Cessna and other manufacturers said they would not build any more planes until there was some kind of liability reform. The Aviation Revitalization Act limited aviation product liability to 20 years from the date of manufacture, so Cessna and others started building planes again. The tort lawyers have made several unsuccessful (so far) attempts to break the 20 year limit. If they ever do succeed, the manufacturers will probably quit for good. Imagine if John Edwards becomes president. Think businesses are leaving in droves now, just wait. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 03:40 PM |
Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 04:53 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 12:57 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |