![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fly an ASW-28. The under-surface of the wing has a nice little piece
of plastic that covers the dump valve and which is hinged by a piece of cloth tape. When flying with water ballast my assumption is that correct procedure is to leave the piece of plastic in place, but open and hanging down from the cloth tape hinge. I am thinking that airflow will keep the plastic closed and be more aerodynamic over the dump valve but when dumping ballast it will open sufficiently to let the ballast dump efficiently. Or should I simply remove the piece of plastic entirely when carrying water ballast? Thanks. Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your assumption is correct. Leave it as is with or without water. The
airstream closes them in flight and water exiting will open them. A related question: Does anybody know what to use to replace these? Mine fell off. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the later Schleichers have them.
If you fly without the covers, take ear plugs. It sounds like twin jets. Apparently they are useful for something other than swearing at while you're washing the wings. Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/13/11 7:40 PM, Tom Nau wrote:
I fly an ASW-28. The under-surface of the wing has a nice little piece of plastic that covers the dump valve and which is hinged by a piece of cloth tape. When flying with water ballast my assumption is that correct procedure is to leave the piece of plastic in place, but open and hanging down from the cloth tape hinge. I am thinking that airflow will keep the plastic closed and be more aerodynamic over the dump valve but when dumping ballast it will open sufficiently to let the ballast dump efficiently. Or should I simply remove the piece of plastic entirely when carrying water ballast? Thanks. Tom Yes leave it in place as a hinge. Make sure you fill and test dump and make sure everything seems to work OK. If you've never flown with water I would encourage you to find a local experienced pilot locally (ideally somebody who flies a Schleicher with water) to help you make sure everything is OK and talk through with you things like fill and ground handing procedures, flyng handling differences, thermalling speeds, performance effects etc. And of course read the POH. And make sure you let the tow pilot know you are heavy/carrying water. Darryl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/13/11 8:13 PM, Barny wrote:
Your assumption is correct. Leave it as is with or without water. The airstream closes them in flight and water exiting will open them. A related question: Does anybody know what to use to replace these? Mine fell off. Cut a circle out of suitable thickness sheet mylar. Attach with Tesa cloth tape. Darryl |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 7:40*pm, Tom Nau wrote:
I fly an ASW-28. The under-surface of the wing has a nice little piece of plastic that covers the dump valve and which is hinged by a piece of cloth tape. When flying with water ballast my assumption is that correct procedure is to leave the piece of plastic in place, but open and hanging down from the cloth tape hinge. I am thinking that airflow will keep the plastic closed and be more aerodynamic over the dump valve but when dumping ballast it will open sufficiently to let the ballast dump efficiently. Or should I simply remove the piece of plastic entirely when carrying water ballast? *Thanks. Tom I noticed during pre-flight that my 28 had lost one so I took the other off to save as a template. The uncovered dump ports are excited by the airflow and "sing". Trouble is they sing at slightly different frequencies. The beat tone is almost unbearable and I nearly abandoned the flight. The noise stops during dumping. I don't know if it happens with the dump valves open after all the water is gone. I suspect they don't sing then as the port resonant frequency should be very different with the valves open. I wanted to keep my water and didn't try it. I keep a set of ear plugs in the glider just in case it happens again. I cut new ones from clear plastic sheet which I had covered with white shelf covering. The clear plastic was available and the white shelf covering made it look better. I attached them with 3M electrical tape, the same as used for wing gap sealing. The home made ones have lasted about 7 years compared to 1year for the factory ones. Perhaps that's because I learned not to hit them when cleaning the wing. It's also a good idea to replace the tape each year Andy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
All the later Schleichers have them. /snip O'Leary?! My -29 didn't come with them, I had to do it meself. 2N7O |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 9:40*pm, Tom Nau wrote:
I fly an ASW-28. The under-surface of the wing has a nice little piece of plastic that covers the dump valve and which is hinged by a piece of cloth tape. When flying with water ballast my assumption is that correct procedure is to leave the piece of plastic in place, but open and hanging down from the cloth tape hinge. I am thinking that airflow will keep the plastic closed and be more aerodynamic over the dump valve but when dumping ballast it will open sufficiently to let the ballast dump efficiently. Or should I simply remove the piece of plastic entirely when carrying water ballast? *Thanks. Tom That's how they're supposed to work. Tape them closed when flying dry so you don't rip them off. Don't forget to take the tape off when you put on water ballast. (Add "check dump covers" to your preflight) When inevitably they fall off, replace with any flat piece of plastic. I find that the clear plastic case that holds 3m vinyl electrical tape which I use for wing tape works great, and I usually have a large supply of that around. There is a larger issue of tips and tricks for water ballast which others have covered. Some additional points: -It is important to adjust CG using the tail tank. It's hard enough to thermal with water without a far forward cg -The glider is designed to carry enough water for the strongest conditions imaginable -- smoking ridge day, 1000k attempt at Ely, etc. On most days you do not need or want full water. Half water is a good place to start. - Takeoff with water ballast is harder. Carefully brief your wing runner that the wings must be level and balanced -- no force up or down. He or she may have to slosh the water through the internal baffles to get it level and balanced. There must be no up or down pressure. Ask the wing runner to let go briefly to show you there is no pressure if you're in doubt. The wing runner must then run like crazy, without pushing up or down. This is a good time to use partial spoilers for roll control. Needless to say all this gets more fun at high altitude, hot, cross-downwind at a contest. Release early if you drop a wing! -Enjoy! I like flying with water. It's a big performance increase for free. John Cochrane |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another water ballast question.
How well does a fully ballasted glider recover from a spin? I practice spins every season, dry. The recovery is easy and predictable. (SZD 55-1) I have never tried a spin with water. If I accidently spin at low atlitude (1000 ft agl or lower) fully ballasted, should I attempt to recover, or just bail? Kerry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 17, 11:13*pm, P9 wrote:
Another water ballast question. How well does a fully ballasted glider recover from a spin? I practice spins every season, dry. *The recovery is easy and predictable. *(SZD 55-1) *I have never tried a spin with water. *If I accidently spin at low atlitude (1000 ft agl or lower) fully ballasted, should I attempt to recover, or just bail? Kerry Hi Kerry, Enjoyed flying with you at Air Sailing Sports. Good race again this year and those AFA guys can no longer be ignored, can they?Your 55 holds a ton of water, I'd recommend you try spinning it with a half load, then work up from there.................well maybe that's not such a good idea because a partial load can shift to the outboard wing tip and give a big lateral weight problem. I remember Carl Herold telling me the 12 would tuck under to where the nose was more than vertical when he spun her with a load of water.........Hmmm, maybe don't spin it wet would be the best advice and if you spin it at 1000 agl, i'd do it with a BRS installed. Adding the BRS to my Genesis was the best thing I have done lately, I feel much more secure now and enjoy that comfortable seat (without chute). Cheers, JJ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trying for a Diamond Goal tommorow - water ballast question | Scott Alexander[_2_] | Soaring | 27 | April 29th 10 09:28 PM |
DUMB ROOKIE QUESTION | Travis Beach | Soaring | 10 | November 7th 06 07:28 PM |
Who first used water ballast and when? | John McCullagh | Soaring | 9 | October 18th 06 09:36 AM |
water ballast leak | Robert Harvey | Soaring | 2 | May 27th 05 03:49 PM |
Std 102 water ballast plug | Tom Dukerich | Soaring | 3 | April 12th 05 05:10 PM |