![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it worth the bother?
We're coming up on our annual inspection in May, and there are at least four antennas on our bird that do nothing. I'll bet there's a few feet of cable going to each one, too. Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? I never saw any speed decrease when I added an antenna, so I wouldn't expect to see an increase when I removed one. I've never added more than one at a time, though. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article iI76c.32458$_w.542610@attbi_s53,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Is it worth the bother? We're coming up on our annual inspection in May, and there are at least four antennas on our bird that do nothing. I'll bet there's a few feet of cable going to each one, too. Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? Antennae increase drag (especially when they're attached to bugs squashed onto the leading edge of the wing). So, yes, removing them should result in increased airspeed. The big question is, "how much". I think the answer tends to be "less than you'd hope". One good clue is to read the optional equipment supplements in most POH's. They'll typically list a half dozen different radios that could be installed, each with their own protuberance on the outside. Generally, under "performance changes" they'll say something like "no significant change". You've really got two choices. You can spend a lot of time and money doing really careful performance measurements before and after and see if removing them really made any difference. Or, you can just pay the guy to take them off and be happy in your believe that you've made the airplane faster. It certainly won't make it any slower. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:iI76c.32458$_w.542610@attbi_s53... Is it worth the bother? We're coming up on our annual inspection in May, and there are at least four antennas on our bird that do nothing. I'll bet there's a few feet of cable going to each one, too. Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Jay, You have no choice. You are REQUIRED to remove inoperative equipment. Part 91.405 (c). Best, Karl. BTW, the reg says the equipment must be repaired, replaced, removed or inspected at the next required inspection. What they mean by "inspected" is if a required inspection is due. Not just the mechanic peering at a piece of inop equipment and letting it go for another year! This rule is regularily ignored by the GA community. But it would never fly at a reputable repair facility. Once the antennas are removed you will have to revise the equipment list and weight and balance. "Curator" N185KG, fire breathing Skywagon! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, Christ. Here we go again...
Jim "kage" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -You have no choice. You are REQUIRED to remove inoperative equipment. Part -91.405 (c). - -Best, -Karl. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I cannot speak to your airframe. When we did the calcs on Voyager, we figured we added roughly half a knot for each antenna we put inside the fuselage. I'd probably guess about the same for you. Worth the bother? Perhaps. Surely makes a cleaner looking airplane, even WITH the scab patches over the old antenna holes (painted to match, of course). Jim "Jay Honeck" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: -Is it worth the bother? Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article iI76c.32458$_w.542610@attbi_s53,
"Jay Honeck" wrote: Is it worth the bother? We're coming up on our annual inspection in May, and there are at least four antennas on our bird that do nothing. I'll bet there's a few feet of cable going to each one, too. Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? It depends on the location -- antennae on the top of the fuselage or ahead of the windshield are in the highest-drag places and may give you a knot. Another effect to consider is that, (even unused) antennae may affect radio transmission coverage. they can resonate with your transmitter and cause distortions and scalloped radiation patterns. Advice: get rid of unused antennae! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are working spares so they can Stay :-)
Michelle kage wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:iI76c.32458$_w.542610@attbi_s53... Is it worth the bother? We're coming up on our annual inspection in May, and there are at least four antennas on our bird that do nothing. I'll bet there's a few feet of cable going to each one, too. Does removing an antenna net you any extra speed, or is it mainly a weight reduction thing? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" Jay, You have no choice. You are REQUIRED to remove inoperative equipment. Part 91.405 (c). Best, Karl. BTW, the reg says the equipment must be repaired, replaced, removed or inspected at the next required inspection. What they mean by "inspected" is if a required inspection is due. Not just the mechanic peering at a piece of inop equipment and letting it go for another year! This rule is regularily ignored by the GA community. But it would never fly at a reputable repair facility. Once the antennas are removed you will have to revise the equipment list and weight and balance. "Curator" N185KG, fire breathing Skywagon! -- Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P "Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike) Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() kage wrote: You have no choice. You are REQUIRED to remove inoperative equipment. All of these antennae work just fine, so they don't have to be removed. There's no reg that says they have to be connected to anything. George Patterson Battle, n; A method of untying with the teeth a political knot that would not yield to the tongue. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:49:08 -0800, Jim Weir wrote:
Worth the bother? Perhaps. Surely makes a cleaner looking airplane, even WITH the scab patches over the old antenna holes (painted to match, of course). "Scab patches"? I just bought one of the little 99 cent steel hole plugs at Coast to Coast Aerospace, when I pulled the LORAN antenna off the Fly Baby.... :-) Ron "And I painted it with a $3 rattle can" Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Removing water repelent from fiberglass lay-up? | Roger | Home Built | 2 | December 2nd 04 11:15 PM |
Do ADF antennas need replacing if changing the receiver? | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | December 11th 03 10:13 PM |
Choice of Paint for use over Copper foil Antennas | Charlie Precourt | Home Built | 1 | December 2nd 03 02:51 AM |
Hidden Antennas | Dick Goff | Home Built | 2 | August 20th 03 05:23 PM |
F-14 squadrons removing refueling cover plate? | dave999 | Military Aviation | 7 | August 6th 03 09:45 AM |