![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Cessna 172 that is not flown very often. I have been approached by
an EAA chapter that wants to use my craft for their Young Eagles training program and have offered to pay an hourly rate for use of the aircraft in non-commercial operations. I have a non commercial insurance policy and could "name" the two pilots who would be piloting the aircraft. The rate of reimbursement would be calculated on the operating cost (including fixed cost, engine and avionics reserve, airframe maintenance, etc.) I can't get a definitive answer from the FAA if this would be allowable under the "shared expense" provisions of the FARs Part 91. I would appreciate comments from any who has expreience with this type of arrangement. Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eddie Sanderford" wrote in message ... I have a Cessna 172 that is not flown very often. I have been approached by an EAA chapter that wants to use my craft for their Young Eagles training program and have offered to pay an hourly rate for use of the aircraft in non-commercial operations. I have a non commercial insurance policy and could "name" the two pilots who would be piloting the aircraft. The rate of If you are not doing the flying then this is not an FAA issue in regard to a commercial operation. The only potential FAA issue would be if you need 100-hour inspections, but if you are supplying only the airplane and not the pilot then it would not be considered a "for hire" operation by the FAA and thus you do not need 100-hour inspections. The main issue I see here would be for you to check with your insurer that you are covered when your airplane is used in this manner. Some companies offer "limited commercial" policies for this reason. Some policies do not consider this to be a commercial operation if you just recover costs. Some policies would indeed consider this type of operation to be commercial -- again I say "commercial" operation is a concern not from an FAA standpoint but rather from an insurance standpoint. -------------------- Richard Kaplan, CFII www.flyimc.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this is not a shared expense issue... because you are not in the aircraft at
the time of usage to share the expense.. this may border on "providing a rental aircraft".. it does not matter that you only rent if for cost.. or even at a loss.. the Fed's don't care if you are a poor businessman... but it is the "intent" of renting.. BT "Eddie Sanderford" wrote in message ... I have a Cessna 172 that is not flown very often. I have been approached by an EAA chapter that wants to use my craft for their Young Eagles training program and have offered to pay an hourly rate for use of the aircraft in non-commercial operations. I have a non commercial insurance policy and could "name" the two pilots who would be piloting the aircraft. The rate of reimbursement would be calculated on the operating cost (including fixed cost, engine and avionics reserve, airframe maintenance, etc.) I can't get a definitive answer from the FAA if this would be allowable under the "shared expense" provisions of the FARs Part 91. I would appreciate comments from any who has expreience with this type of arrangement. Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed's JSF Costs to Rise $45 Billion | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 3 | April 6th 04 09:33 PM |
Annual Costs - Take the Pledge | Roger Long | Owning | 25 | February 1st 04 03:41 PM |
True costs of a light twin... | Captain Wubba | Owning | 20 | November 20th 03 02:32 AM |
LOOKING FOR COST SHARING | Corey Bonnell | Owning | 0 | October 19th 03 09:04 PM |
Canadians: Estimate monthly costs? | Drew Hamilton | Owning | 9 | July 28th 03 12:32 AM |