![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Our normally-aspirated Arrow IV is currently in the shop getting a Lycoming
factory rebuilt ("zero time") IO-360-C1C6 installed. This is the first time in my 2000 hr. flying career that I have ever had to deal with an engine break-in, so I would welcome advice from the group. Lycoming apparently recommends operation at 65-75% for the first 50 hours "or until oil consumption stabilizes." This is to assure proper piston ring seating. They also recommend use of straight mineral oil during this period, and we plan to run on Aeroshell 50 weight mineral oil. Anybody suggest otherwise? On our old engine, we ran single weight SAE 50 (Aeroshell 100 AD) year-round with excellent results. (we fly out of PAE, where it rarely gets very cold in the winter.) In around 2150 hours of operation (i.e. well past TBO), we never had a major problem. Even now, we are changing engines on general principles, not because of any indication that anything is wrong. Continuing to use Aeroshell 100 AD (after break-in) is therefore rather tempting, but it seems that everyone is extolling the virtues of multi-viscosity, semi-synthetic oils. These contain an anti-scuff additive which is required on some larger Lycoming engines. Apparently, Lycoming has no problems with the additive in smaller engines like the IO-360, but doesn't require or even specifically recommend it. Any thoughts from the group on oil selection for general (after break-in) operation? -- -Elliott Drucker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your break-in strategy is sound - just do what Lycoming recommends.
The cold-start advantages of a mult-vis are tremendous and the new synthetic oils are superb with the latest corrosion resistance packages. PAE isn't terribly cold, but at startup, all ambient temps are cold enough for a multi-vis to pay off big. It's simply a MUCH better all-around oil for private owners. - Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got the same advice on my Arrow IO360 from Poplar Grove Airmotive
with a recent TOH - 50 weight until consumption stabilizes, then multi-viscosity. I have chrome cylinders so it took about 30 hours to stabilize. They told me to fly it hard - 70-75% and stay low (5000 ft) to maximize manifold pressure. I used 100-150 ROP to keep the cylinders cool. First trip was 30 minutes orbiting the Class D airport at 2000 AGL with agreement from tower just to make sure I could land in a hurry if something came loose. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"markjen" wrote in message news:M7UVc.64601$TI1.59232@attbi_s52...
Your break-in strategy is sound - just do what Lycoming recommends. The cold-start advantages of a mult-vis are tremendous and the new synthetic oils are superb with the latest corrosion resistance packages. PAE isn't terribly cold, but at startup, all ambient temps are cold enough for a multi-vis to pay off big. It's simply a MUCH better all-around oil for private owners. Do they make multi-vis mineral oils? You certainly don't want to be dumping Aeroshell 15w50 in a new engine until after break in. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|