![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
there is a HAL HPT-32 (pistonengined 2 seater trainer light a/c) which, when attempting a stall, does not pitch down correctly. Instead one of the wings (either port or starboard (50/50)... no gyro problems due to engine) almost always drops, and this genreally results in the a/c entering a spin (which the rookie pilots are unable to handle, generally). There is no inherent imbalance in the c.g. location due to the fuel tanks ot fuel flow. What could be causing such a wing drop while stalling? Is it soem inherent instability in the roll axis? Any help/advice/recollection of previous such problems and what you did to fix it will be greatly appreciated. Lars |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
drake wrote:
Hi, there is a HAL HPT-32 (pistonengined 2 seater trainer light a/c) which, when attempting a stall, does not pitch down correctly. Instead one of the wings (either port or starboard (50/50)... no gyro problems due to engine) almost always drops, and this genreally results in the a/c entering a spin (which the rookie pilots are unable to handle, generally). Sounds like a great trainer aircraft! If this problem common to the type, or just this particular A/C? The 50/50 part is interesting. Normally, if a plane is bent, it'll favor one side or 'tuther. Stall strips are a common way to improve stall performance, so as to keep the tips flying (and ailerons working) while the root stalls. Does the type have them? Good luck... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , drake says...
Hi, there is a HAL HPT-32 (pistonengined 2 seater trainer light a/c) which, when attempting a stall, does not pitch down correctly. Instead one of the wings (either port or starboard (50/50)... no gyro problems due to engine) almost always drops, and this genreally results in the a/c entering a spin (which the rookie pilots are unable to handle, generally). There is no inherent imbalance in the c.g. location due to the fuel tanks ot fuel flow. What could be causing such a wing drop while stalling? Is it soem inherent instability in the roll axis? Any help/advice/recollection of previous such problems and what you did to fix it will be greatly appreciated. Lars Bet you don't have any wash out in the wings.If it was always the same wing then it could be rigging. That's a starting point . See ya Chuck |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nafod40 wrote in message ...
drake wrote: Hi, there is a HAL HPT-32 (pistonengined 2 seater trainer light a/c) which, when attempting a stall, does not pitch down correctly. Instead one of the wings (either port or starboard (50/50)... no gyro problems due to engine) almost always drops, and this genreally results in the a/c entering a spin (which the rookie pilots are unable to handle, generally). Sounds like a great trainer aircraft! If this problem common to the type, or just this particular A/C? The 50/50 part is interesting. Normally, if a plane is bent, it'll favor one side or 'tuther. Stall strips are a common way to improve stall performance, so as to keep the tips flying (and ailerons working) while the root stalls. Does the type have them? Good luck... Some airplanes might have some nasty stall characteristics caused by wing design, and sometimes such design is intentional to get good aerobatic performance and to teach advanced flight maneuvers. Most training airplanes are designed to have straightforward stalling behaviour, some so forgiving that there is no real stall at all. Newbie pilot students can get into big trouble real quick with stall behaviour that drops one wing or the other. Any certified airplane will have a straight-ahead stall break. Wing drop is caused by one wing stalling slighty earlier, or the stall on that side has progressed more than on the other, and if the wing isn't out of rig, it's caused by uncoordinated flight. The nose of the airplane isn't pointing straight ahead so that the airplane is sliding slightly sideways as it stalls, and the wingtip that's farther aft will stall first and drop. The same holds true for skidding turns; the inside wing will drop first. A power-on stall will most often drop the wing on the side that has the upgoing prop blade; in North America, that's the left wing. The rotating propwash strikes the wing root and causes a higher angle of attack on that side, causing an earlier stall. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... (drake) wrote: there is a HAL HPT-32 (pistonengined 2 seater trainer light a/c) which, when attempting a stall, does not pitch down correctly. Instead one of the wings (either port or starboard (50/50)... no gyro problems due to engine) almost always drops, and this genreally results in the a/c entering a spin A strong wing drop that occurs on either side can be caused by the wing tips stalling too early. As the tip stalls, the wing with the stalled tip begins to drop, the AOA increases on the dropping wing and the entire wing stalls. Washout (wing twist to reduce tip AOA) or a carefully selected airfoil for the tip (that stalls at a higher AOA than inner parts of the wing) may be used by the designer to prevent this undesirable phenomenon. Careful comparison of washout angle and/or the airfoil at the tip with the plans might detect some rigging or construction problems. Any tendency of the wing to twist, while in flight, can exacerbate the problem. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. It occurs to me that they might want to check the aileron rigging. If both ailerons were "drooped", it would reduce the washout. Tim Ward |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I once heard a neat story about stall spin characteristics.
It seems that a light airplane manufacturer wanted a piece of the two seat training market that Cessna dominated with the C150/152. They designed and built a nifty little low wing prototype that flew real nice with much better performance than the 150/152 with the same power. Then they invited a bunch of CFI's to fly it and asked, "How'd you like it?" "It doesn't spin - we want to teach spins", they said. The manufacturer hired some engineering consultants and said, "Make it spin". The consultants added stall strips on the outboard wing to make the wing tips stall first - and boy, did it spin. The manufacturer brought the CFI's back and let them fly it again. The CFI's said, "Boy, does it spin". "We like it", they said. So, the manufacturer built some little airplanes and the CFI's and their students started making smoking holes in the ground as they spun in. "Wow", said the manufacturer, "we got to fix this". So, they hired another bunch of aeronautical consultants who looked up "how to fix bad stall/spin characteristics" in their "how to design little airplanes" book. The book said, "add stall strips to the inboard wing", so that's what they did. Now the little airplane would still spin, but not as enthusiastically as before. With FOUR stall strips on the wing, it didn't perform worth a damn either. Still, the manufacturer built a bunch of them before exiting the market. Makes you wonder. Bill Daniels |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Tim Ward" wrote It occurs to me that they might want to check the aileron rigging. If both ailerons were "drooped", it would reduce the washout. Tim Ward I believe you have it backwards. Droop decreases overall AOA, and acts as washout, right? -- Jim in NC I don't think so. I'm using "droop" here to indicate that the trailing edges are lower than normal. If it's lower in back, the AOA should be larger, and the washout less. If they were both _reflexed_, it would be higher on the trailing edge, and increase the washout. Tim Ward |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Ward" wrote It occurs to me that they might want to check the aileron rigging. If both ailerons were "drooped", it would reduce the washout. Tim Ward I believe you have it backwards. Droop decreases overall AOA, and acts as washout, right? -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Ward" wrote in message ... "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Tim Ward" wrote It occurs to me that they might want to check the aileron rigging. If both ailerons were "drooped", it would reduce the washout. Tim Ward I believe you have it backwards. Droop decreases overall AOA, and acts as washout, right? -- Jim in NC I don't think so. I'm using "droop" here to indicate that the trailing edges are lower than normal. If it's lower in back, the AOA should be larger, and the washout less. If they were both _reflexed_, it would be higher on the trailing edge, and increase the washout. Tim Right. I had to do some hand flying to get that figured! g -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|