![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a
typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? Kind of like a bridge with it's clip angles on I-beams. Then the diagonals and other bridge members are riveted/bolted onto the clip angles.. Or similiar to those wooden semi-circular gussets used to sandwich a wooden fuselage member joint. It appears to me that the linear inches of weld could be greater than those fishmouthed connections so tedious to make. Thanks, Dick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Sukhoi 26/29/31 aerobatic a/c use a system similar to the one you
describe. A plate is welded on the outside and the inside of the cluster but there is a slot, about 1/16 in wide and 4 or 5 inches long cut in the plate exactly in line with the center of each tube. It is through this slot that the welds are made between the plate and the tubes. The tubing on the Sukhoi is VN02 stainless, not 4130 but it is an interesting piece of design. "Dick" wrote in message . com... Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? Kind of like a bridge with it's clip angles on I-beams. Then the diagonals and other bridge members are riveted/bolted onto the clip angles.. Or similiar to those wooden semi-circular gussets used to sandwich a wooden fuselage member joint. It appears to me that the linear inches of weld could be greater than those fishmouthed connections so tedious to make. Thanks, Dick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? --------------------------------------------------------- Dear Dick, In simple terms, the reason for NOT using the method you've suggested has to do with stress (or load) concentration. Maximum stress is said to appear in the 'outer-most fiber of the material,' meaning on the surface of the tubing, not its center. The accepted method of making a joint provides a continuous load-path between the outer-most fibers of the members making up the cluster. ------------------------------- With regard to the tedious task of fitting tubes to be welded, the tedium is usually in inverse proportion to your tooling & experience. First off, the tubes do not have to be a zero-zero fit. Indeed, there MUST be some gap, otherwise you'll end up with a distorted cluster. Secondly, when a smaller tube intersects with one (or more) of larger diameter, the fishmouth is little more than a minor amount of scalloping. Finally, step-drills and a few simply-made jigs will allow you to fabricate most of your fitted-ends on the drill press, or on the lathe using milling cutters. The benefit of the latter methods are more significant than they may appear because most structures of welded steel tubing are symmetrical; such set-ups make it quite easy to produce two identical pieces. As with all of the manual arts, producing a nice cluster is largely the product of practice. The use of mild steel tubing, such ERW, or even EMT with the galvanizing removed, allows you to practice without going bankrupt buying 4130. -R.S.Hoover |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve, Are the tube ends cluster welded together also or is the only
connection via that slot? Thanks, Dick "Steve Beaver" wrote in message ... The Sukhoi 26/29/31 aerobatic a/c use a system similar to the one you describe. A plate is welded on the outside and the inside of the cluster but there is a slot, about 1/16 in wide and 4 or 5 inches long cut in the plate exactly in line with the center of each tube. It is through this slot that the welds are made between the plate and the tubes. The tubing on the Sukhoi is VN02 stainless, not 4130 but it is an interesting piece of design. "Dick" wrote in message . com... Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? Kind of like a bridge with it's clip angles on I-beams. Then the diagonals and other bridge members are riveted/bolted onto the clip angles.. Or similiar to those wooden semi-circular gussets used to sandwich a wooden fuselage member joint. It appears to me that the linear inches of weld could be greater than those fishmouthed connections so tedious to make. Thanks, Dick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The tube ends are fish-mouthed and welded but the weld bead is tiny. perhaps
Only 1/8" wide so that the joint is not "buried" in weld, as a 4130 cluster would be. I suspect this is the way this type of stainless needs to be welded and that it requires the reinforcement of the special gussetts. "Dick" wrote in message m... Steve, Are the tube ends cluster welded together also or is the only connection via that slot? Thanks, Dick "Steve Beaver" wrote in message ... The Sukhoi 26/29/31 aerobatic a/c use a system similar to the one you describe. A plate is welded on the outside and the inside of the cluster but there is a slot, about 1/16 in wide and 4 or 5 inches long cut in the plate exactly in line with the center of each tube. It is through this slot that the welds are made between the plate and the tubes. The tubing on the Sukhoi is VN02 stainless, not 4130 but it is an interesting piece of design. "Dick" wrote in message . com... Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? Kind of like a bridge with it's clip angles on I-beams. Then the diagonals and other bridge members are riveted/bolted onto the clip angles.. Or similiar to those wooden semi-circular gussets used to sandwich a wooden fuselage member joint. It appears to me that the linear inches of weld could be greater than those fishmouthed connections so tedious to make. Thanks, Dick |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Veeduber,
I'm uncomfortable with the loading you describe for tube clusters. Bending loads cause the maximum stress at the 'outer-most fiber of the material'. However tube clusters are usually from a truss design using tension/compression loads only. There are probably local bending loads around the welded cluster ends but these are developed mainly due to the stiffness of the connection itself. Ideally the connection would be a "pin joint" but that's not practical. I don't see a reason that an alternate attachment of the tubes can't be used. I would advise caution to ensure that the connection design does handle the loads presented. Doug Veeduber wrote: Other than a weight consideration, what concern is there with replacing a typical fuselage tube cluster (all legs in the same geometric plane) with a half circle plate where the slotted end legs are slide onto and then welded? --------------------------------------------------------- Dear Dick, In simple terms, the reason for NOT using the method you've suggested has to do with stress (or load) concentration. Maximum stress is said to appear in the 'outer-most fiber of the material,' meaning on the surface of the tubing, not its center. The accepted method of making a joint provides a continuous load-path between the outer-most fibers of the members making up the cluster. ....... -R.S.Hoover |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see a reason that an alternate attachment of the tubes can't be used.
I would advise caution to ensure that the connection design does handle the loads presented. ------------------------------------------------------- Dear Doug, No problem. Other methods can (and have) been used. (Numerous examples of gusset & pin fuselages using square tube and even angle-stock, both extruded & self-bent). A point often overlooked is that Mr's Warren, Pratt & Howe didn't do the twist :-) They just sat there, waiting for the next train to come along. The tricky bit with a fuselage is what happens when you have to deal with a complex load (ie, tension, compression & torque). The usual solution was a mare's nest of wire diagonals and the need to 'tune' the fuselage every time the weather changed. Attempting to emulate this method using using pinned joints consisting of struts & gussets throws you back into the task of transferring the load through the cluster, which is now a morningstar collection of gussets, at least as difficult to weld (or otherwise fabricate) as a conventional tubing cluster. I think the real point here is that if you're going to use round steel tubing you'll find there are more reasons to stick with accepted welding practices than to depart from them. But it's really up to you. It's your plane; you can build it any way you want. Best example of gussetted steel structures is probably towers of various types that are subjected to wind loads (ie, complex loading). Interesting to note that when minimum weight is a consideration they abandon gusseted angles in favor of cluster-welded tube. (Rohn, etc.) -R.S.Hoover |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pitts Special Steel Tube Fuse Mod. | Martin Morgan | Home Built | 0 | November 23rd 03 11:08 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Welding techniques for 4130? | Building The Perfect Beast | Home Built | 29 | September 4th 03 08:52 PM |
Hinges under stress - mechanical engineering type question | Corrie | Home Built | 21 | August 6th 03 08:49 AM |