![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This came from a separate thread "Typo in Battery Article in Soaring"
On Feb 2, 10:11 am, Karl Kunz wrote: John, also enjoyed your article and will try your technique on a couple of batteries I am unsure of. Also, since we have an EE on the line I wanted to ask about battery setups. My partner and I have installed some new toys in our ASW20 (transponder, etc) and are wondering what is the best way add more power. We are currently running a single 12v 9amp battery. Would it be better to add another 9amp battery or to go to a single higher capacity battery. If using two batteries, what is the best way to tie them together. -karl I suggest multiple batteries for a couple of reasons; Redundancy - you can have a failure either in the air or on the ground so with two batteries you have a spare. Expense - I replace one of my batteries (I own 4 and fly with 2) every year so over the course of four years I replace them all (the older units are given to the club). While two 9ah batteries are more expensive than a single 12ah battery, my yearly replacement cost is less of a single time bite to the budget. Size - You are probably set up for the 9ah size and a larger 12ah may not fit. However, someone mentioned a 12ah to me that has the same footprint as the 9ah only taller. Anyone seen this? Weight - Is 2x9ah heavier than 1x12ah? Is that important? Hmmmm. Power - 2x9ah has more energy capability than 1x12ah Now, how to connect them? What I recomment is three runs of 14-16 gauge Tefzel wire between the batteries and the panel. This gauge is overkill but I don't want any voltage drop with a smaller gauge. 3 runs = a common ground, battery 1 and battery 2. I use red (battery) and black (ground) heat shrink to mark each run. I use PowerPole connectors - very robust and secure. At the panel I use three switches to run the batteries in parallel. Battery 1 on/off, battery 2 on/off and then the output of both to a master switch and then to the avionics. The thinking of separate battery switches is that you can disconnect a "bad" battery. I always have all three switches turned on during flight - the need to be able to turn off a bad battery hasn't arisen for me and I am unsure how I would even know (everything dies? smoke?). I do, however, have a voltmeter, so I turn on/off each battery to see how they are doing (on the ground typically). Some people wonder that with both batteries connected to one another in parallel, is there an issue with one battery charging the other? Certainly cross charging happens (no two batteries are identical) but unless one battery is significantly discharged from another, this cross charging would be slight. I always swap out both batteries right off the chargers at the same time to minimize this. Some solutions suggest installing diodes in series to prevent this cross charging but diodes "steal" 0.5v-0.8v of your voltage and every volt counts in a glider. So I don't use diodes. Does anyone else? Finally - ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL - install a fuse on each battery right at the terminals. Not a breaker, a fuse. Fuses are faster than breakers. This fuse is more important than fuses/breakers in the panel. My $0.02. Let me know how your testing turns out. - John DeRosa http://aviation.derosaweb.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John, you addressed all the issues we where concerned about. Thanks for some great info.
-karl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 helmi, 18:10, JohnDeRosa wrote:
At the panel I use three switches to run the batteries in parallel. Battery 1 on/off, battery 2 on/off and then the output of both to a master switch and then to the avionics. *The thinking of separate battery switches is that you can disconnect a "bad" battery. *I always have all three switches turned on during flight - the need to be able to turn off a bad battery hasn't arisen for me and I am unsure how I would even know (everything dies? *smoke?). You would know that by total power loss of all your batteries. You have essentially parallel connection with all your batteries during flight. When one fails, it drains your good batteries empty. When your radio or computer starts blinking it's too late. Best option is to use simple selector switch to choose one battery at time, and keep other batteries disconnected. rk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 7:43*am, rk wrote:
On 3 helmi, 18:10, JohnDeRosa wrote: At the panel I use three switches to run the batteries in parallel. Battery 1 on/off, battery 2 on/off and then the output of both to a master switch and then to the avionics. *The thinking of separate battery switches is that you can disconnect a "bad" battery. *I always have all three switches turned on during flight - the need to be able to turn off a bad battery hasn't arisen for me and I am unsure how I would even know (everything dies? *smoke?). You would know that by total power loss of all your batteries. You have essentially parallel connection with all your batteries during flight. When one fails, it drains your good batteries empty. When your radio or computer starts blinking it's too late. Best option is to use simple selector switch to choose one battery at time, and keep other batteries disconnected. rk I've been using a somewhat different approach. Two batteries, each powering half the avionics. So batt 1 has the radio and nav computer bus; batt 2 has the logger/PDA and backup vario bus. Instrument "busses" hooked up via individual 3 position switches so that either buss can be powered by either battery or disconnected. Normally, run the batts/busses independent, but have had occasions when one batt went low early, and just switched the bus it was on to the other battery for all instruments for rest of flight. I also use the built-in voltmeters in various instruments (AR-4201, SN10) to monitor the health of the batteries during flight. Seems to work OK for the past 12 years... Kirk 66 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 8:10*am, JohnDeRosa wrote:
This came from a separate thread "Typo in Battery Article in Soaring" On Feb 2, 10:11 am, Karl Kunz wrote: John, also enjoyed your article and will try your technique on a couple of batteries I am unsure of. *Also, since we have an EE on the line I wanted to ask about battery setups. My partner and I have installed some new toys in our ASW20 (transponder, etc) and are wondering what is the best way add more power. We are currently running a single 12v 9amp battery. Would it be better to add another 9amp battery or to go to a single higher capacity battery. If using two batteries, what is the best way to tie them together. -karl I suggest multiple batteries for a couple of reasons; Redundancy - you can have a failure either in the air or on the ground so with two batteries you have a spare. Expense - I replace one of my batteries (I own 4 and fly with 2) every year so over the course of four years I replace them all (the older units are given to the club). *While two 9ah batteries are more expensive than a single 12ah battery, my yearly replacement cost is less of a single time bite to the budget. Size - You are probably set up for the 9ah size and a larger 12ah may not fit. *However, someone mentioned a 12ah to me that has the same footprint as the 9ah only taller. *Anyone seen this? Weight - Is 2x9ah heavier than 1x12ah? *Is that important? *Hmmmm. Power - 2x9ah has more energy capability than 1x12ah Now, how to connect them? * What I recomment is three runs of 14-16 gauge Tefzel wire between the batteries and the panel. *This gauge is overkill but I don't want any voltage drop with a smaller gauge. *3 runs = a common ground, battery 1 and battery 2. *I use red (battery) and black (ground) heat shrink to mark each run. *I use PowerPole connectors - very robust and secure. At the panel I use three switches to run the batteries in parallel. Battery 1 on/off, battery 2 on/off and then the output of both to a master switch and then to the avionics. *The thinking of separate battery switches is that you can disconnect a "bad" battery. *I always have all three switches turned on during flight - the need to be able to turn off a bad battery hasn't arisen for me and I am unsure how I would even know (everything dies? *smoke?). *I do, however, have a voltmeter, so I turn on/off each battery to see how they are doing (on the ground typically). Some people wonder that with both batteries connected to one another in parallel, is there an issue with one battery charging the other? Certainly cross charging happens (no two batteries are identical) but unless one battery is significantly discharged from another, this cross charging would be slight. *I always swap out both batteries right off the chargers at the same time to minimize this. *Some solutions suggest installing diodes in series to prevent this cross charging but diodes "steal" 0.5v-0.8v of your voltage and every volt counts in a glider. *So I don't use diodes. *Does anyone else? Finally - ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL - install a fuse on each battery right at the terminals. *Not a breaker, a fuse. *Fuses are faster than breakers. *This fuse is more important than fuses/breakers in the panel. My $0.02. *Let me know how your testing turns out. - John DeRosahttp://aviation.derosaweb.net I've been using very low loss Schottky diodes (95SQ015 - Vf stays at about 0.2v @ 1A last I checked) to run all my batteries (sometimes 4) in parallel. Increased AH capacity from parallel operation offsets Vf and provides isolation of a misbehaving battery. Absolutely fuse at the battery terminals with fuse sized appropriately for the size/ length of conductor. Comments welcome. QT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 8:10*am, JohnDeRosa wrote:
right off the chargers at the same time to minimize this. *Some solutions suggest installing diodes in series to prevent this cross charging but diodes "steal" 0.5v-0.8v of your voltage and every volt counts in a glider. Ideal diode, such as LTC4358, would eliminate the voltage drop at the cost of higher complexity. Bart |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been using very low loss Schottky diodes (95SQ015 - Vf stays at
about 0.2v @ 1A last I checked) QT Ideal diode, such as LTC4358, would eliminate the voltage drop at the cost of higher complexity. Bart First, a teaching moment for those non-techies about using diodes to isolate two battery setups so that a bad battery won't suck the life out of the good battery, see http://aviation.derosaweb.net/presen...iring_2007.pdf (page 21-25) for some explanations. While I know about Schottky diodes and their low forward voltage drop (0.2v which seems like the best of the diode worlds) but I had not heard of the Ideal Diode which seems custom made for our application of two battery sources and if one dies the other takes over. Good to 5A. What's not to like? But what is the critical forward voltage drop? I read; "The internal MOSFET turns on and the amplifier tries to regulate the voltage drop across the IN and OUT connections to 25mV. If the load current causes more than 25mV of drop, the MOSFET is driven fully on and the voltage drop is equal to RDS(ON) x ILOAD." 25mv? GREAT NEWS! RDS(ON) x ILOAD = 20milli-ohm x 5A = 0.1 volt. Better than a Schottky. WHOOP! (BTW: the small m for milli instead of big M for mega tripped me up) But then in the Specs Table I read; ÄVSD Source-Drain Regulation Voltage (VIN - VOUT) 1mA IIN 100mA l 25 mV (Typ) ÄVSD Body Diode Forward Voltage Drop IIN = 5A, MOSFET Off l 0.8 V (Typ) So aren't we back to a silicon diode like forward drop? OK, when the MOSFET is ON then we are back to the 0.1 volt. Interesting. Lousy SM packaging for our application though. Bart - How are you mounting it? Pictures? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 8:47*pm, JohnDeRosa wrote:
But then in the Specs Table I read; * *ÄVSD Source-Drain Regulation Voltage (VIN - VOUT) 1mA IIN 100mA l 25 mV (Typ) * *ÄVSD Body Diode Forward Voltage Drop IIN = 5A, MOSFET Off l 0.8 V (Typ) So aren't we back to a silicon diode like forward drop? *OK, when the MOSFET is ON then we are back to the 0.1 volt. * Interesting. The 0.8V voltage drop is for the "body diode" of the internal MOSFET: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_MOSFET#Body_diode In other words, that's the drop you will get if the controller dies, or if the input voltage drops below 9V. Lousy SM packaging for our application though. *Bart - How are you mounting it? *Pictures? I have never used one in a glider. If I were to, I would put the two chips on a small PCB and cover it with heatshrink. Something like this: http://i00.i.aliimg.com/img/pb/905/8...834905_364.jpg Actually, if I find time, I can make a prototype within a week or two. Then Karl can test it if he wants to :-) Bart |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would certainly be willing to give it a try.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would certainly be willing to give it a try. Would 5amps be adequate for this? Are these diodes fail operational, i.e. if it fails will I continue to get power from the effected battery.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiple Battery Setup | JohnDeRosa | Soaring | 0 | February 7th 12 04:01 AM |
tailwheel setup question | Dick[_1_] | Home Built | 2 | May 20th 08 11:20 AM |
Vario setup | brianDG303 | Soaring | 1 | April 3rd 08 05:20 PM |
FS 2004 setup | Dave Hetteen | Simulators | 4 | June 25th 04 10:40 PM |
WX Works setup | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 16 | December 8th 03 04:23 AM |