![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all:
I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. When I am entirely free of the Class B, I pick a VFR cruising altitude that is appropriate, and at that point I lean the engine out on the 172. My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? aw |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the SR22, there's a specific fuel flow setting (mix adjustment) for
every 4000' to generate max power. So, leaning at various altitudes. I used a similar though not nearly so precise approach to climb settings in my Grumman Tiger. Just mind the EGT/CHTs. -- Patrick Flynn Sammamish, WA Cirrus SR22 N6099Z KRNT "aaronw" wrote in message ... Hi all: I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. When I am entirely free of the Class B, I pick a VFR cruising altitude that is appropriate, and at that point I lean the engine out on the 172. My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? aw |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My engine is notorious for spark plug fouling (200hp Lycoming IO-360), so
I lean whenever I (1) level off or (2) exceed 5000' MSL in climb. This is as per Lycoming's recommednations. If I level off and lean below 5000' and then climb again, I go full rich until I level off again or climb above 5000'. This procedure can be a pain, but it keeps things running smooth and keeps the plugs clean. Best regards, Steve Robertson N4732J 1967 Beechcraft Musketeer Super III aaronw wrote: Hi all: I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. When I am entirely free of the Class B, I pick a VFR cruising altitude that is appropriate, and at that point I lean the engine out on the 172. My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? aw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aaronw,
You might take note of the EGT indication during your initial climb. Then, when you climb further and leave the power setting as it is, the EGT will drop. It would be safe to lean so much that the EGT setting will climb back to the take-off value. Howeever, you should probably select a climb speed higher than Vy in order to cool the engine better. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aaronw wrote in
: I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. ... should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? Most Class-B's have that little trick. They never "quite" let you in... just step you up right below the floor. The answer to your question in part depends upon how long you are going to be in cruise at each altitude, and how big the step climb is. If the steps are small, and far apart, then you can lean some and probably still climb without going back to a richer setting. [Remember, it will be getting richer automatically as you climb.] With something like a 1000 foot climb, if I am at reduced RPM, I will probably just leave it there for the climb - whereas if I am climbing 10K feet I will certainly want to go back to max RPM. Another suggestion - consider climbing at a cruise-climb rate. You will get out from under the shelf faster and keep the engine cooler. Ideally you will just sort of "continue" your climb from sector to sector. ----------------------------------------------- James M. Knox TriSoft ph 512-385-0316 1109-A Shady Lane fax 512-366-4331 Austin, Tx 78721 ----------------------------------------------- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aaron,
The more reasonable question is "why not lean"? Leaning the mixture in most airplanes to at least a ballpark location doesn't take long at all and should be a part of setting the power every time one flies level. Yes, when departing under circumstances where you have a number of level flight periods and then short climbs, you are messing with the power frequently. But, leaning produces good things, such as avoiding fouled plugs and extending your range and endurance, something you may be profoundly grateful for someday. If you are running at 65% power or less, you absolutely cannot hurt the engine by leaning it wrong, it will quit before it detonates. At 75% power simply shoot for about 100 degrees rich of peak and you will get best power while not getting the high temps and pressures you get at 50 degrees rich of peak. For most 172s you probably aren't going to operate lean of peak as the engine usually runs roughly and is uncomfortable. So, for each place where you level off, go ahead and lean. Enrichen appropriately for the next climb. At cruise set the mixture where you want it for the power setting you are using. What's nice is that you can usually just leave the mixture knob in that position for the rest of the flight, until you are on short final at which time you may want to enrichen it in the event you make a go around. Go ahead and lean the mixture, why waste fuel? All the best, Rick aaronw wrote in message . .. Hi all: I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. When I am entirely free of the Class B, I pick a VFR cruising altitude that is appropriate, and at that point I lean the engine out on the 172. My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? aw |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() aaronw wrote: My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? I have a Maule with a Lycoming O-320. I lean whenever I can and enrichen the mixture for climb. If I know that I'll be climbing again in a few minutes, I don't go through the entire procedure of leaning until it stumbles and then enrichening until it's smooth, however. I just pull the red knob back using the TLAR ("that looks about right") method. George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
always lean... during climbs..
we use a Pawnee with 235HP fixed pitch prop for towing gliders, we start at 2800MSL, and it is noticeable to lean above 4000MSL, (1200AGL), during the climb I watch the RPM and lean for peak rpm in the full throttle climb and then "bump" it rich, as we are always climbing. Some will argue it is not needed to lean below 3000MSL.. for your area.. but lean to peak RPM if the temp gauge is out. BT "aaronw" wrote in message ... Hi all: I fly underneath a Class B airspace (Washington). My question is that while I am leaving the area on a flight, I will often end up climbing up higher as I get further from my departure airport as I get under the shelves that are higher up. When I am entirely free of the Class B, I pick a VFR cruising altitude that is appropriate, and at that point I lean the engine out on the 172. My question is, knowing that I will have frequent full power applications to climb out to higher altitudes, 1000 - 2000 - 2500 - 3000, etc., should I lean at each altitude, or is it better to just let it go until I have stabilized at my cruising altitude and then lean accordingly? aw |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Btiz,
Some will argue it is not needed to lean below 3000MSL.. Uh, only those clinging to one of the more stupid OWTs (Old Wive's Tale). -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some will argue it is not needed to lean below 3000MSL..
Fuel calculations are based on a properly leaned engine. You may come up short if you don't lean. Jose -- (for Email, make the obvious changes in my address) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
So I invested my US$6°°.....GUESS WHAT!!!... less than ten days later, I received money | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | January 16th 05 06:48 AM |
Glue for wing step grippy thingies | Steven Barnes | Owning | 6 | November 28th 04 09:56 PM |
Re; What do you think? | Kelsibutt | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 29th 03 06:55 AM |
STEP program helps advance hundreds of hand-picked airmen | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 09:15 PM |