![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The news mentioned that while AF1 was enroute to Baghdad Int., a
British Airways pilot saw AF1 and asked (on the horn) "is that AF1?". Then AF1s' pilot responded "No, it's a Gulfstream". At first I thought that was funny but then after thinking about it, I'm wordering how true this is. First of all, did that BA pilot have binoculars? How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect wherever AF1 goes in the world. ***I just thought of something as I was typing this, maybe there was no TFR because Pres. Bush "wasn't onboard" and it wouldn't have offically been AF1, as far as call sign and ATC goes, at the time.*** Secondly, if none of that is the case, why would the BA pilot would ask that question over the radio and what are the chances the 2 aircraft would be on the same freq.? Just wondering and speculating, not that it matters either way. If this did happen, the pilot of AF1 has a great way of saying "Shut the hell up man, this isn't what you think" wink wink. Very funny. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The air-to-air freqs you refer to are not used in oceanic airspace...all
transoceanic flights are talking to the appropriate oceanic controller on his/her discrete frequency. Use of this freq for plane-to-plane is not kosher, but not unusual, either. Bob gardner "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Well, there are just two air-to-air freqs that I know of. Better yet, he could have called on the emergency freq, which all pilots must monitor if able. On 28 Nov 2003 10:37:39 -0800, (Milo) wrote: The news mentioned that while AF1 was enroute to Baghdad Int., a British Airways pilot saw AF1 and asked (on the horn) "is that AF1?". Then AF1s' pilot responded "No, it's a Gulfstream". At first I thought that was funny but then after thinking about it, I'm wordering how true this is. First of all, did that BA pilot have binoculars? How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect wherever AF1 goes in the world. ***I just thought of something as I was typing this, maybe there was no TFR because Pres. Bush "wasn't onboard" and it wouldn't have offically been AF1, as far as call sign and ATC goes, at the time.*** Secondly, if none of that is the case, why would the BA pilot would ask that question over the radio and what are the chances the 2 aircraft would be on the same freq.? Just wondering and speculating, not that it matters either way. If this did happen, the pilot of AF1 has a great way of saying "Shut the hell up man, this isn't what you think" wink wink. Very funny. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know this is hard for a lot of people to comprehend, but actually
US regulations only apply within the US. Hence an FAA TFR can only exist within US airspace. And luckily even the FAA doesn't (afaik) try to put a near-Mach-1 moving TFR around AF1 while it is actually flying, although there may be some separation provided behind the scenes by ATC. John "Milo" wrote in message om... The news mentioned that while AF1 was enroute to Baghdad Int., a British Airways pilot saw AF1 and asked (on the horn) "is that AF1?". Then AF1s' pilot responded "No, it's a Gulfstream". At first I thought that was funny but then after thinking about it, I'm wordering how true this is. First of all, did that BA pilot have binoculars? How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect wherever AF1 goes in the world. ***I just thought of something as I was typing this, maybe there was no TFR because Pres. Bush "wasn't onboard" and it wouldn't have offically been AF1, as far as call sign and ATC goes, at the time.*** Secondly, if none of that is the case, why would the BA pilot would ask that question over the radio and what are the chances the 2 aircraft would be on the same freq.? Just wondering and speculating, not that it matters either way. If this did happen, the pilot of AF1 has a great way of saying "Shut the hell up man, this isn't what you think" wink wink. Very funny. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Gardner" wrote
The air-to-air freqs you refer to are not used in oceanic airspace...all transoceanic flights are talking to the appropriate oceanic controller on his/her discrete frequency. Use of this freq for plane-to-plane is not kosher, but not unusual, either. For the 25 years that I flew trans-oceanic, whether the FAA or FCC approved it or not, 123.45 WAS Oceanic Common. I suspect that it still is. Not too many Radio Cops out there. :-) Bob Moore |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Milo
Long data article on Drudge. Part said he was in Stealth mode, no AF call sign, no escort, routing traffic and handling within system, nothing overt. Not just sure but may have turned navigation lights off at night??? etc., etc. Glad he made the trip. Troops got a boost. Shows he can move any place he wants without being stopped by any terrorist organization. Big John On 28 Nov 2003 10:37:39 -0800, (Milo) wrote: The news mentioned that while AF1 was enroute to Baghdad Int., a British Airways pilot saw AF1 and asked (on the horn) "is that AF1?". Then AF1s' pilot responded "No, it's a Gulfstream". At first I thought that was funny but then after thinking about it, I'm wordering how true this is. First of all, did that BA pilot have binoculars? How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect wherever AF1 goes in the world. ***I just thought of something as I was typing this, maybe there was no TFR because Pres. Bush "wasn't onboard" and it wouldn't have offically been AF1, as far as call sign and ATC goes, at the time.*** Secondly, if none of that is the case, why would the BA pilot would ask that question over the radio and what are the chances the 2 aircraft would be on the same freq.? Just wondering and speculating, not that it matters either way. If this did happen, the pilot of AF1 has a great way of saying "Shut the hell up man, this isn't what you think" wink wink. Very funny. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Words are he did turn out the lights for the night landing in Baghdad.. but
I'm sure the lights were on when in other countries ATC system. BT "Big John" wrote in message ... Milo Long data article on Drudge. Part said he was in Stealth mode, no AF call sign, no escort, routing traffic and handling within system, nothing overt. Not just sure but may have turned navigation lights off at night??? etc., etc. Glad he made the trip. Troops got a boost. Shows he can move any place he wants without being stopped by any terrorist organization. Big John On 28 Nov 2003 10:37:39 -0800, (Milo) wrote: The news mentioned that while AF1 was enroute to Baghdad Int., a British Airways pilot saw AF1 and asked (on the horn) "is that AF1?". Then AF1s' pilot responded "No, it's a Gulfstream". At first I thought that was funny but then after thinking about it, I'm wordering how true this is. First of all, did that BA pilot have binoculars? How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect wherever AF1 goes in the world. ***I just thought of something as I was typing this, maybe there was no TFR because Pres. Bush "wasn't onboard" and it wouldn't have offically been AF1, as far as call sign and ATC goes, at the time.*** Secondly, if none of that is the case, why would the BA pilot would ask that question over the radio and what are the chances the 2 aircraft would be on the same freq.? Just wondering and speculating, not that it matters either way. If this did happen, the pilot of AF1 has a great way of saying "Shut the hell up man, this isn't what you think" wink wink. Very funny. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The air-to-air freqs you refer to are not used in oceanic airspace...all transoceanic flights are talking to the appropriate oceanic controller on his/her discrete frequency. Use of this freq for plane-to-plane is not kosher, but not unusual, either. Ah, I stand corrected! I wonder if Maurice Kirk knows this? He is planning to fly his Piper Cub from Australia to the U.S. next year. all the best -- Dan Ford email: see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did he see AF1 with the TFR in place, I assume they are in effect
wherever AF1 goes in the world. TFRs are US only. It is up to the Authorities in other countries to decide how to provide appropriate airspace protection. The evil empire does not have the power to install TFRs outside the US -yet. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |