![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi!
Just spoke to my mechanic, and he told me that there will be a new regulation here in Norway for private aircraft that takes away the mandatory engine replacement after approx 2000 hours. Instead, an engine is allowed to run indefinately as long as the regular maintenance is carried out at a sertified shop. He said this is the way it works in the US. Can someone verify this, and tell me, does anyone ever replace their engine if this is the regulations apart from when having a total failure (fire and such..) Also, what are the safety issues? Does a new engine actually perform better? He told me about a C177 that came to his shop from the US for overhaul (change of a couple of sylinders +) and it had over 9000 hours on it's engine... I thought it was mandatory everywere to replace an engine after 2000 hours (or whatever time on individual engines). If this gets approved, it certainly is good news for us private operators. Maybe a GNS430 is not so far reach anyway....(our engine is just over 2000 hours now...) Thanks, Frode Berg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Frode Berg" wrote: Hi! Just spoke to my mechanic, and he told me that there will be a new regulation here in Norway for private aircraft that takes away the mandatory engine replacement after approx 2000 hours. Instead, an engine is allowed to run indefinately as long as the regular maintenance is carried out at a sertified shop. He said this is the way it works in the US. Can someone verify this, and tell me, does anyone ever replace their engine if this is the regulations apart from when having a total failure (fire and such..) That regulation applies only if the plane is used for commercial operations. Privately-used planes can fly until the engine fails to pass compression or oil consumption specs, or start making metal. Also, what are the safety issues? Does a new engine actually perform better? He told me about a C177 that came to his shop from the US for overhaul (change of a couple of sylinders +) and it had over 9000 hours on it's engine... I doubt seriously that the C177 had 9000 hrs between overhauls. It probably had at least four overhauls, but used the same cylinders and crank. Most other parts, including the cam, valves, lifters and followers were probably replaced at overhaul. I thought it was mandatory everywere to replace an engine after 2000 hours (or whatever time on individual engines). Not in the US! Such regulations are the product of non-GA types writing the rules. If this gets approved, it certainly is good news for us private operators. Maybe a GNS430 is not so far reach anyway....(our engine is just over 2000 hours now...) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frode Berg" wrote in message ...
He said this is the way it works in the US. Can someone verify this, and tell me, does anyone ever replace their engine if this is the regulations apart from when having a total failure (fire and such..) Yes, that's the rule in the U.S. You can run your engine beyond TBO if you're not for-hire. Usually, we don't wait for a total failure before overhauling. I'm just about to run past TBO on my engine. My AI and I have agreed on a regular program of oil analysis and careful monitoring of temps and pressures for signs that the engine is wearing. Of course, the first time that the engine needs any costly work (like a new cylinder), that will immediately become overhaul time. This engine has been rock-solid for the last 1300 hrs. that I've owned it, so I expect to get a few hundred more before replacing it. It puts off the $15K expense of an overhaul for maybe a year or two, but not indefinitely. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frode Berg wrote: He said this is the way it works in the US. That's the way it works for many aircraft. There are certain types of businesses that have to have the engine overhauled at the service time specified by the engine manufacturer, but others don't have to do so. Note that the engine is usually overhauled. Few people replace an engine with a brand new one, and the regulations don't require replacement with new. Many individuals who own aircraft will continue to operate the plane until the engine starts to give signs of wearing out. These signs would be things like using too much oil, oil fouling the plugs, poor compression, and so on. Also, what are the safety issues? Older engines are more prone to failure. I've read, for example, that this is a big problem with the Douglas DC-3 as new original engines can't be bought anymore. Does a new engine actually perform better? An overhauled engine should perform as well as a new one, and some shops produce engines which they claim are better than new. He told me about a C177 that came to his shop from the US for overhaul (change of a couple of sylinders +) and it had over 9000 hours on it's engine... It's possible for an engine to last that long if it were overhauled several times during that 9,000 hours. It's highly unlikely that one would live that long without an overhaul. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi!
Thanks for all replies. When you say "overhaul", what does this imply? Is it an engine change, or just a major visit to the shop going through everything and changing whatever is needed? Here, a major overhaul means dismounting the engine, sending it to Lycoming (or continental) and putting a factory overhauled one back in. This costs approx $20.000 + shipping (over $1200) + additional parts and of course labour... However, if "overhaul" means replacing a cylinder or two, inspecting cranckshaft, changing magnetos adn plugs, and generally going through everything, this is a complete different matter, and probably much cheaper, no? Thanks, Frode "G.R. Patterson III" skrev i melding ... Frode Berg wrote: He said this is the way it works in the US. That's the way it works for many aircraft. There are certain types of businesses that have to have the engine overhauled at the service time specified by the engine manufacturer, but others don't have to do so. Note that the engine is usually overhauled. Few people replace an engine with a brand new one, and the regulations don't require replacement with new. Many individuals who own aircraft will continue to operate the plane until the engine starts to give signs of wearing out. These signs would be things like using too much oil, oil fouling the plugs, poor compression, and so on. Also, what are the safety issues? Older engines are more prone to failure. I've read, for example, that this is a big problem with the Douglas DC-3 as new original engines can't be bought anymore. Does a new engine actually perform better? An overhauled engine should perform as well as a new one, and some shops produce engines which they claim are better than new. He told me about a C177 that came to his shop from the US for overhaul (change of a couple of sylinders +) and it had over 9000 hours on it's engine... It's possible for an engine to last that long if it were overhauled several times during that 9,000 hours. It's highly unlikely that one would live that long without an overhaul. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Frode Berg"
wrote: Hi! Thanks for all replies. When you say "overhaul", what does this imply? Is it an engine change, or just a major visit to the shop going through everything and changing whatever is needed? note: I'm not an A&P, so I might get some of the terms wrong. At a minimum, "Overhaul" means disassembly, checking that each part is within service limits, and reassembly. I think there are also some parts that must be replaced whenever the engine is disassembled. Most people I know want an overhaul to new limits, where each part is checked to make sure that it has the same dimensions as a new part. Also, some overhaul shops replace some additional parts with new because their experience is that doing so will reduce problems down the road. When I had my engine overhauled, I didn't do an engine swap. The engine only had ~2300 hours TT, so I had it overhaul to new limits (and opted for new cylinders). A friend saved time by doing ae engine swap. -- Bob Noel |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frode Berg wrote: When you say "overhaul", what does this imply? Is it an engine change, or just a major visit to the shop going through everything and changing whatever is needed? As Bob Noel says, they take the engine apart and make sure that every part meets the specifications for reinstallation (the "service limits"). Some people prefer to make sure that all parts meet the specifications for new parts. The key is that this can be done by any competent mechanic; the engine does not have to go back to Lycoming or Continental. Shop policies also differ. When Lycoming overhauls an engine, they replace all the cylinders and pistons with new ones. A local shop may recondition the old cylinders and reuse them. A cylinder on something like an O-320 can typically last 5,000 hours or so before it becomes risky to use it. The bottom line is that getting an overhaul done by one of the major shops can save you several thousand dollars over getting one done by Lycoming, and having one done locally (called a "field overhaul") can save you even more. I've even known some people to overhaul the engine themselves. This requires that a certified mechanic oversee the work. George Patterson Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is "Hummmmm... That's interesting...." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote: Frode Berg wrote: When you say "overhaul", what does this imply? Is it an engine change, or just a major visit to the shop going through everything and changing whatever is needed? As Bob Noel says, they take the engine apart and make sure that every part meets the specifications for reinstallation (the "service limits"). Some people prefer to make sure that all parts meet the specifications for new parts. The key is that this can be done by any competent mechanic; the engine does not have to go back to Lycoming or Continental. Shop policies also differ. When Lycoming overhauls an engine, they replace all the cylinders and pistons with new ones. A local shop may recondition the old cylinders and reuse them. A cylinder on something like an O-320 can typically last 5,000 hours or so before it becomes risky to use it. The bottom line is that getting an overhaul done by one of the major shops can save you several thousand dollars over getting one done by Lycoming, and having one done locally (called a "field overhaul") can save you even more. I've even known some people to overhaul the engine themselves. This requires that a certified mechanic oversee the work. That's the way i did my last overhaul. I had the cylinders ground .010" oversize, installed all new bearings, valves, valve seats, pistons, rings, lifters and followers, seals, etc. It is NOT rocket science! All it really requires is the ability to use a torque wrench, common sense, a source of parts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
Car engine FAA certified for airplane use | Cy Galley | Home Built | 10 | February 6th 04 03:03 PM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |