![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No plans for production.. Students exercise in design of electric gliders. Flays great. Sort of PW-7.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poy8O...endscreen&NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIpkwWF93vo RRK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIpkwWF93vo RRK Could be a glider like this be used as a trainer ? How many take-offs are you making on electric self-lunch before it give up ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An electric self launch Arcus 2 seat glider has a quoted endurance of 2,000 m of climb, after which you need a long recharge. That amount of climb should use about 5 litres of petrol in a solo engined version, which has a fuel capacity of 41 litres. So the electric version is heavier, costs a lot more and has far less endurance. Much as I like the quietness and simplicity of electric operation, battery technology has a way to go before electric self launching could be viable for a trainer.
On Tuesday, 12 February 2013 03:55:37 UTC, RRK wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIpkwWF93vo RRK Could be a glider like this be used as a trainer ? How many take-offs are you making on electric self-lunch before it give up ? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:10:16 AM UTC-5, waremark wrote:
An electric self launch Arcus 2 seat glider has a quoted endurance of 2,000 m of climb, after which you need a long recharge. The new "Charge+" feature increases that ~18% IIRC. Also climb is proportional to weight; I don't remember at what weight they quoted the figure above. ...So the electric version is heavier, costs a lot more and has far less endurance. Much as I like the quietness and simplicity of electric operation, battery technology has a way to go before electric self launching could be viable for a trainer. Absolutely. Its great for a launch and some saves, but absolutely not for repeated take-offs as required in basic training. Antares 20E gets quite a bit more altitude as its lower weight than Arcus (same motor and battery). The Chinese trainer showed a few years back had hoped to include quick-swap battery packs, but they've gone quiet after the structural failure accident that killed Martin Wetzel (?sp). And the battery packs are not cheap. Electric trainers aren't going to happen until we see much better cells (capacity per weight/volume and cost)... Hope that's clear, Best Regards, Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Students first flight in a 1-26 | Wayne Paul | Soaring | 0 | March 29th 12 04:11 AM |
Two very fun students | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 4 | June 11th 06 11:24 PM |
Aerodynamics for students? | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 2 | March 29th 06 05:07 AM |
Postponed 3 students due to TSA | Burt Compton | Soaring | 52 | November 1st 04 09:34 AM |
USA - All students must show | Jim Vincent | Soaring | 0 | October 19th 04 02:29 PM |