![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
check this out, a ATC was possibly killed by a relative in a plane crash
http://news.independent.co.uk/europe...p?story=495147 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a terribly sad story.
-- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" "Jeff" wrote in message ... check this out, a ATC was possibly killed by a relative in a plane crash http://news.independent.co.uk/europe...p?story=495147 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not moved. From the above article you all can see that the media
already sets themselves to blure the facts and start inventing a story where the controller was not guilty from any wrongdoing. The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. I doubt that the swiss court could have found him guilty as charged though. After seeing that the swiss society will protect their own, even if they have made a mistake, I can understand someone taking the law into their own hands... "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k0n%b.24737$AL.460609@attbi_s03... It's a terribly sad story. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" "Jeff" wrote in message ... check this out, a ATC was possibly killed by a relative in a plane crash http://news.independent.co.uk/europe...p?story=495147 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
angry wrote:
The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. That's absurd. The controller's instruction was not an error on his part. It was necessary to separate the aircraft and avoid a collision. However, combined with other events, which he was unaware of, it did result in the accident. Murder is premeditated. He did not plan on killing anyone. I doubt that the swiss court could have found him guilty as charged though. After seeing that the swiss society will protect their own, even if they have made a mistake, I can understand someone taking the law into their own hands... That is also absurd. The Germans are investigating the accident and preparing the accident report, since the aircraft collided over their territory. Therefore, you don't have to concern yourself with the Swiss covering anything up. As far as taking the law into his own hands, there is never an excuse for that. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
angry wrote:
I am not moved. From the above article you all can see that the media already sets themselves to blure the facts and start inventing a story where the controller was not guilty from any wrongdoing. The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. He's not, ICAO DOC. 8168 Volume 1, Part VIII: 3.2 Use of ACAS indications .... c) in the event of an RA, pilots shall: 1) respond immediately by following the RA as indicated, unless doing so would jeopardize the safety of the aeroplane; 2) follow the RA even if there is a conflict between the RA and an air traffic control (ATC) instruction to manoeuvre; 3) not manoeuvre in the opposite sense to an RA. [end quote] Now whoever carved him up - he is. Dima |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. Wrong. Why was the altitude change erroneously? Two planes, same FL, collision course - what else is he supposed to do? The tapes do show that the controller tried to separate the two planes correctly - only he did it too late. A big part of the fault lies with the Skyguide company (Swiss ATC). They allowed one controller to work a scope alone, they shut down a collision alert feature for servicing AND they simultaneously shut down a huge part of the phone system, also for servicing. The controller had to work TWO scopes at that time (his fault: he sent his colleague into the break) and was trying to contact a tower by phone to advise him of incoming IFR traffic in one sector. In the other sector, the two planes were approaching - unnoticed by the (not working) collision alert feature and the controller. A German ATC guy saw the conflict and tried to contact him by phone - the line was busy (see above why). The collision avoidance instruction was too late, but in itself correct. The russian pilot was the one to add the final mistake: he did not follow his TCAS RA, but the controllers instruction. So, no, that's a lot of mistakes, but definately no murder. Patrick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "angry" wrote in message ... The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. "Angry" and "nuts"...try learning simple defintions before shooting your mouth off. I doubt that the swiss court could have found him guilty as charged though. After seeing that the swiss society will protect their own, even if they have made a mistake, I can understand someone taking the law into their own hands... You're sicker than either these two characters. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And unfortunately the Russian crew didn't study this requirement well
enough, or hadn't been trained adequately in regard to this requirement. The Russina First Officer pointed out that the RA said climb more than once to the Captain. The whole concept of Crew Management Resource training was intended to teach crews to work together better, and to keep the Captain from making the First Officer irrelevant in an emergency. Dima Volodin wrote in message ... angry wrote: I am not moved. From the above article you all can see that the media already sets themselves to blure the facts and start inventing a story where the controller was not guilty from any wrongdoing. The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. He's not, ICAO DOC. 8168 Volume 1, Part VIII: 3.2 Use of ACAS indications ... c) in the event of an RA, pilots shall: 1) respond immediately by following the RA as indicated, unless doing so would jeopardize the safety of the aeroplane; 2) follow the RA even if there is a conflict between the RA and an air traffic control (ATC) instruction to manoeuvre; 3) not manoeuvre in the opposite sense to an RA. [end quote] Now whoever carved him up - he is. Dima |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, that's what I ment - the ATC put unnesesary pressure to the poor pilot.
By playing the "authority" too much, he forced the pilot into taking his advice as one that is overriding, so the russian pilot flew into the other aircraft - this is why I call the ATC murderer. If the russian pilot had made a mistake, be it because of CRM issues or other, I could have said that he is a fool - but he is not. That's sad! "Dima Volodin" wrote in message ... angry wrote: I am not moved. From the above article you all can see that the media already sets themselves to blure the facts and start inventing a story where the controller was not guilty from any wrongdoing. The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. He's not, ICAO DOC. 8168 Volume 1, Part VIII: 3.2 Use of ACAS indications ... c) in the event of an RA, pilots shall: 1) respond immediately by following the RA as indicated, unless doing so would jeopardize the safety of the aeroplane; 2) follow the RA even if there is a conflict between the RA and an air traffic control (ATC) instruction to manoeuvre; 3) not manoeuvre in the opposite sense to an RA. [end quote] Now whoever carved him up - he is. Dima |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absurd is to see people like you believe in the newspaper stories.
The ATC did made a mistake by choosing wrong altitude to advice as so to avoid the collision. You are saying that he was unaware of the other aicraft - that's absurd - he was the only one on duty and he had ALL the aicraft in his vicinity, their course, and their altitude displayed for him to make a decision. He made the wrong one. He further in a tone not allowing any questioning instructed the russian pilot to obey him and ignore the onboard TCAS instructions. The poor pilot did (contrary to what he should have done) and a lot of people died as a result. That's because of the ATC's mistake and attitude. Did you get it this time? "James Robinson" wrote in message ... angry wrote: The recorded conversations between the ATC and the aicraft involved in the accident clearly show that the controller erroneously instructed the russian pilot to change altitude and that's exactly the cause for the accident. IT WAS HIS FAULT, HE IS A MURDERER. That's absurd. The controller's instruction was not an error on his part. It was necessary to separate the aircraft and avoid a collision. However, combined with other events, which he was unaware of, it did result in the accident. Murder is premeditated. He did not plan on killing anyone. I doubt that the swiss court could have found him guilty as charged though. After seeing that the swiss society will protect their own, even if they have made a mistake, I can understand someone taking the law into their own hands... That is also absurd. The Germans are investigating the accident and preparing the accident report, since the aircraft collided over their territory. Therefore, you don't have to concern yourself with the Swiss covering anything up. As far as taking the law into his own hands, there is never an excuse for that. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Skyguide traffic controller killed | HECTOP | Piloting | 39 | March 3rd 04 01:46 AM |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |
Why the Royal Australian Air Force went for Israeli Python-4 AAM's over US AIM-9L's | Urban Fredriksson | Military Aviation | 79 | July 19th 03 03:33 AM |