![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My graduate law class just covered legal entities. By luck my partner
and I had registered our Mooney in a Mutual Benefit Corp (C-corp). Had we not, the attorney teaching the class said we would probably be considered "Partners" under the eyes of the law. If we had just put the plane in our names we would have been "Partners". As near as I can tell "Partners" is the laws punishment for not doing anything else, "Partners" happens automatically by default. "Partners" is the worse case scenario because it comes with unlimited liability. If your partner is driving to the airport and hits a dog, the dog's owner can sue you and take your house. In some states LLCs are a good way to establish. However, in California LLCs have a minimum state tax of $800/year. Some people tried to get smart and create their LLCs in other states. Well, California now has a business fee for out of state LLCs of, guess what, $800/year. ![]() 8% for a plane you bought out of state, but they can charge you an 8% "use tax" when you get it here (although there are some ways to avoid that). In anycase, I guess we got dumb lucky when we decided to create a corporation. The only downside is that we have to have an annual meeting, save meeting minutes, have officers, and report taxes (although the corp's taxes are zero). -Robert, living and learning |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I chose to go with a LLC and deal with the $800 excise tax every year. It's
really silly that they charge that much for the "opportunity to conduct business within California." However, the LLC provides me with protection and allows me not to have to deal with maintaining two entities for tax purposes (my LLC is where I make my income BTW). The $800 is also deductable, so depending on your tax bracket you should recoup $200 or so. The California C-Corp has a minimum tax of $800, so any year that it doesn't bring in income, you still owe $800. Many folks get burned by that by not properlyl shutting down the C-Corp after they are done with it and the State merilly charges $800 and fees and penalties. Then someone is shocked to see a $5000 bill from the State a few years down the road. r. "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message om... My graduate law class just covered legal entities. By luck my partner and I had registered our Mooney in a Mutual Benefit Corp (C-corp). Had we not, the attorney teaching the class said we would probably be considered "Partners" under the eyes of the law. If we had just put the plane in our names we would have been "Partners". As near as I can tell "Partners" is the laws punishment for not doing anything else, "Partners" happens automatically by default. "Partners" is the worse case scenario because it comes with unlimited liability. If your partner is driving to the airport and hits a dog, the dog's owner can sue you and take your house. In some states LLCs are a good way to establish. However, in California LLCs have a minimum state tax of $800/year. Some people tried to get smart and create their LLCs in other states. Well, California now has a business fee for out of state LLCs of, guess what, $800/year. ![]() 8% for a plane you bought out of state, but they can charge you an 8% "use tax" when you get it here (although there are some ways to avoid that). In anycase, I guess we got dumb lucky when we decided to create a corporation. The only downside is that we have to have an annual meeting, save meeting minutes, have officers, and report taxes (although the corp's taxes are zero). -Robert, living and learning |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The $800 is also deductable, so depending on your tax bracket you should recoup $200 or so. Er, you're not deducting a business expense on your personal tax return, are you? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely.
The $800 goes directly on Schedule C of my personal tax return. My LLC is treated as a sole-proprietership by California because I'm the only member. So, I get the legal protection of a C-Corp and the paperwork ease of a sole-proprietership. r. "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... The $800 is also deductable, so depending on your tax bracket you should recoup $200 or so. Er, you're not deducting a business expense on your personal tax return, are you? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob Thomas" wrote in message
... Absolutely. The $800 goes directly on Schedule C of my personal tax return. My LLC is treated as a sole-proprietership by California because I'm the only member. So, I get the legal protection of a C-Corp and the paperwork ease of a sole-proprietership. r. How does that work exactly? I'm not familiar with LLC's, except that from what I remember you can opt to have them treated as either partnerships or corporations for tax purposes. I don't understand how you can pass the $800 back to your individual return unless you're treated as an S-corp for tax purposes. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Either his sole proprietorship owns the LLC or the LLC *is* the sole
proprietorship. In the latter case, I'm not sure why he isn't filing an 1120 return. Mike MU-2 "Tony Cox" wrote in message hlink.net... "Rob Thomas" wrote in message ... Absolutely. The $800 goes directly on Schedule C of my personal tax return. My LLC is treated as a sole-proprietership by California because I'm the only member. So, I get the legal protection of a C-Corp and the paperwork ease of a sole-proprietership. r. How does that work exactly? I'm not familiar with LLC's, except that from what I remember you can opt to have them treated as either partnerships or corporations for tax purposes. I don't understand how you can pass the $800 back to your individual return unless you're treated as an S-corp for tax purposes. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om... My graduate law class just covered legal entities. By luck my partner and I had registered our Mooney in a Mutual Benefit Corp (C-corp). What is a "Mutual Benefit Corp"? A non-profit? As I remember, you'll need to file more papers to avoid the minimum franchise tax of $800 (CA), and will need to continue to pay that fee until your status is approved (which can take over a year). Had we not, the attorney teaching the class said we would probably be considered "Partners" under the eyes of the law. If we had just put the plane in our names we would have been "Partners". As near as I can tell "Partners" is the laws punishment for not doing anything else, "Partners" happens automatically by default. "Partners" is the worse case scenario because it comes with unlimited liability. There are other ways of protecting yourself against liability than forming a corp. The extra insurance is often cheaper than messing with the paperwork of maintaining a corp (if you can get a 'flat' policy). If your partner is driving to the airport and hits a dog, the dog's owner can sue you and take your house. Perhaps the next class will deal with "piercing the corporate veil". You might not be as enthusiastic about corporate ownership after that. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Single entity LLC's (one director, me) are treated *exactly* like sole
proprietorships by the IRS. However, they are still afforded the same legal protections as a C-Corporation. It *used* to be that LLC's were treated as partnerships, or the LLC could elect to be treated as a C-Corp for tax purposes. Those regulations changed a few years ago. I file a 1040, along with a Schedule C (profit/loss from business) just as any other sole proprietorship would. Just a side note, all of my income is produced through my LLC, so it's not just a holding company for an aircraft. I know some people set them up that way, but just wanted to point out that mine is not setup that way. r. "Tony Cox" wrote in message hlink.net... "Rob Thomas" wrote in message ... Absolutely. The $800 goes directly on Schedule C of my personal tax return. My LLC is treated as a sole-proprietership by California because I'm the only member. So, I get the legal protection of a C-Corp and the paperwork ease of a sole-proprietership. r. How does that work exactly? I'm not familiar with LLC's, except that from what I remember you can opt to have them treated as either partnerships or corporations for tax purposes. I don't understand how you can pass the $800 back to your individual return unless you're treated as an S-corp for tax purposes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The LLC is the sole proprietorship. 1120? I don't file that. 1040 with
Schedule C. r. "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message hlink.net... Either his sole proprietorship owns the LLC or the LLC *is* the sole proprietorship. In the latter case, I'm not sure why he isn't filing an 1120 return. Mike MU-2 "Tony Cox" wrote in message hlink.net... "Rob Thomas" wrote in message ... Absolutely. The $800 goes directly on Schedule C of my personal tax return. My LLC is treated as a sole-proprietership by California because I'm the only member. So, I get the legal protection of a C-Corp and the paperwork ease of a sole-proprietership. r. How does that work exactly? I'm not familiar with LLC's, except that from what I remember you can opt to have them treated as either partnerships or corporations for tax purposes. I don't understand how you can pass the $800 back to your individual return unless you're treated as an S-corp for tax purposes. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob Thomas" wrote in message
... Single entity LLC's (one director, me) are treated *exactly* like sole proprietorships by the IRS. However, they are still afforded the same legal protections as a C-Corporation. It *used* to be that LLC's were treated as partnerships, or the LLC could elect to be treated as a C-Corp for tax purposes. Those regulations changed a few years ago. I file a 1040, along with a Schedule C (profit/loss from business) just as any other sole proprietorship would. Just a side note, all of my income is produced through my LLC, so it's not just a holding company for an aircraft. I know some people set them up that way, but just wanted to point out that mine is not setup that way. Thanks for the clear response. BTW, do you use your aircraft for business or do you just use your LLC to hold title? I've been advised *not* to mix my aircraft (which is used very occasionally for business) with the corporation. My CPA says it attracts attention from the IRS. Not that I'd be worried about the attention per se, but of course the costs involved in even a successful audit are time, effort, and paperwork frustration. Did the FAA require further info on the LLC to register your plane? Like proof of LLC ownership, conditions for ownership transfer etc? I had the devils own trouble attempting to register the plane to a revocable living trust & finally gave up on the buggers and reregistered in my own name. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 119 | March 13th 04 02:56 AM |
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements | me | Military Aviation | 146 | January 15th 04 10:13 PM |
Nonsense: Il-76 could have "saved California from fires"... | Vicente Vazquez | Military Aviation | 9 | November 20th 03 02:09 PM |
CA Corp filing | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 6 | October 16th 03 10:56 AM |