![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example).
I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buy your own copy of See You Mobile!
At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote: If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Użytkownik Wade napisał:
I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Use ConnectMe. -- WojtuÅ› |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the flights that matter? - hand written declaration every time. Would
you trust your diamonds to gadgets? At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote: If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Pete,
I don't use written declarations. I've never had a problem in 15 years with electronic declarations for many badge and record flights. If it is done correctly it is extremely reliable. Best Regards, Paul Remde ________________________________ "Pete Startup" wrote in message ... For the flights that matter? - hand written declaration every time. Would you trust your diamonds to gadgets? At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote: If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote:
If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade I'm going to stick my neck out and say that your initial premise that it is the registered SYM name that is sent to the logger with the declaration is wrong. Copied and pasted from the SYM manual section on task declaration: "After the communication is established, the following data is transferred automatically to the flight recorder: Declared task in SeeYou Mobile which you have entered in Menu Task Glider information which is entered in Menu Settings Polar (glider type) and Menu Settings Log (glider registration) Pilot name as entered in Menu Settings Log" So, if the manual is correct, all you should have to do is alter the pilot details to your own in Menu/Settings/Log for your badge flight and remember to change them back to the owner's when you return the PDA. John Galloway |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:20 07 May 2013, John Galloway wrote:
At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote: If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade My previous posting got truncated as it crossed the Atlantic so here is the complete version. I'm going to stick my neck out and say that your initial premise that it is the registered SYM name that is sent to the logger with the declaration is wrong. Copied and pasted from the SYM manual section on task declaration: "After the communication is established, the following data is transfered automatically to the flight recorder: Declared task in SeeYou Mobile which you have entered in Menu/Task Glider information which is entered in Menu/Settings/Polar (glider type) and Menu/Settings/Log (glider registration) Pilot name as entered in Menu Settings Log" So all you should need to do is enter your own information as described before declaring the task and remember to change it back to the owner's before returning the PDA to him. John Galloway |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/05/2013 01:48, Paul Remde wrote:
Hi Pete, I don't use written declarations. I've never had a problem in 15 years with electronic declarations for many badge and record flights. If it is done correctly it is extremely reliable. But how reliable is it if NOT 'done correctly'? How easy is it to know it's been 'done correctly' electronically compared to a written declaration?. Written ones are inherently 'extremely reliable' for those of us who aren't software gurus. If software was reliable, straightforward and predictable, the number of posts on r.a.s. would be halved. GC Best Regards, Paul Remde ________________________________ "Pete Startup" wrote in message ... For the flights that matter? - hand written declaration every time. Would you trust your diamonds to gadgets? At 05:58 07 May 2013, Wade wrote: If see you mobile was registered to someone else and they are letting you borrow their PDA for a badge flight, the name attached to the registration is what gets declared to any other devices linked up (Cambridge 302 for example). I can enter a separate pilot in the Cambridge 302/303 but I don't want a task declared through to the 302/303 with a different name from see you mobile. Does anyone know a good solution to this one? Thanks Wade |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 7:09:54 PM UTC-7, GC wrote:
But how reliable is it if NOT 'done correctly'? How easy is it to know it's been 'done correctly' electronically compared to a written declaration?. Written ones are inherently 'extremely reliable' for those of us who aren't software gurus. If software was reliable, straightforward and predictable, the number of posts on r.a.s. would be halved. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On June 16, 2004, this happened to me - only time since 1996. I was not aware of any problem until my OO opened the trace. Then, learned: Declaration is NOT VALID! Task: Triangle - (305.9km) Task distance: 305.9km Points: 1) Ephrata 2) Waterville 3) Davenport 4) Ephrata All reached turn points rounded ok. Task Completed. Distance: 305.9km, Duration: 04:16:53, Speed: 38.55kts Sent to The Badge Lady anyway. She asked if OO had verified a written declaration before take-off. If done, Badge leg done ok; if not, sorry. Flew for fun on June 20 and 21, then flew another 300+km triangle on the 22nd. Oh, yeah, did a verified written declaration before that flight – and every Badge leg fight attempt since, including my next ones. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Roy,
Did you do the failed electronic task declaration before or after take-off? Paul _________________________ "Roy Clark, "B6"" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 7:09:54 PM UTC-7, GC wrote: But how reliable is it if NOT 'done correctly'? How easy is it to know it's been 'done correctly' electronically compared to a written declaration?. Written ones are inherently 'extremely reliable' for those of us who aren't software gurus. If software was reliable, straightforward and predictable, the number of posts on r.a.s. would be halved. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On June 16, 2004, this happened to me - only time since 1996. I was not aware of any problem until my OO opened the trace. Then, learned: Declaration is NOT VALID! Task: Triangle - (305.9km) Task distance: 305.9km Points: 1) Ephrata 2) Waterville 3) Davenport 4) Ephrata All reached turn points rounded ok. Task Completed. Distance: 305.9km, Duration: 04:16:53, Speed: 38.55kts Sent to The Badge Lady anyway. She asked if OO had verified a written declaration before take-off. If done, Badge leg done ok; if not, sorry. Flew for fun on June 20 and 21, then flew another 300+km triangle on the 22nd. Oh, yeah, did a verified written declaration before that flight – and every Badge leg fight attempt since, including my next ones. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Declared first emergency last week | EventHorizon | Piloting | 39 | October 28th 09 05:04 PM |
New iphone Mobile Nokia Mobile | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | January 14th 09 06:29 AM |
More Evidence Bush Was Actually Declared a Deserter | WalterM140 | Military Aviation | 9 | August 23rd 04 11:36 PM |
Declared "minimum fuel" | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | April 4th 04 02:43 AM |
A record: 1 in 73 US households declared bankruptcy in '03 | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 7 | March 15th 04 09:27 PM |