![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new
Diesel on the market? Big John Extracted from NTSB report. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On March 15, 2004, at 0830 central standard time, a Beech A36 single-engine airplane, N789SA, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power five miles north of the Lone Star Regional Airport (CXO), near Conroe, Texas. The commercial pilot and one of his two passengers sustained serious injuries. One passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Instrument metrological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. The cross-country flight originated from CXO at 0825, and was destined for Wichita, Kansas. One of the passengers reported that the pilot instructed the Fixed Base Operator to "top off the mains and fill the tips half full." The pilot rated passenger also stated that he did not see the pilot conduct his preflight, but the pilot mentioned to him that he checked the oil. The passenger checked the fuel tanks to see if "the fuel instructions had been completed," and the mains were full and the tip tanks were half full." At this time, the passenger "did not notice anything unusual." The passenger informed the pilot that he had some work to finish and wanted to sit in the back. Due to the request of the pilot, he set in one of the seats facing backwards. The passenger also stated that the pilot started the engine and "no unusual sounds " were heard." While the pilot was going through his checklist, "the engine quit" and the pilot commented "hmm, never done that before." The pilot restarted the engine, and taxied out to the run-up area. Shortly after takeoff, the passenger stated he noted "the humming of the engine was not the humming sound that he was used to hearing in that [air]plane." The engine was "starting to misfire and sputter," as the passenger observed the pilot turning back toward the airport, "because of the unusual engine noises." Subsequently, at an altitude of 2,000 feet, "the engine quit and the airplane was in a steep what seemed to be a slip." The airplane impacted soft terrain near a residential area and came to rest upright. Examination of the airplane by the FAA inspector, who responded to the accident site, revealed both main landing gears were crushed upward through both wing structures. The engine was partially separated from the airframe, and the fuel selector was observed in the "right" position. Examination of the aircraft fuel tanks revealed both wingtip tanks and main tanks were compromised. A "small sample of fuel consistent with 100 low lead fuel" was extracted from the left main fuel tank. A four-ounce fuel sample from the left wingtip tank was "consistent with JET-A fuel." The manager of the fixed base operator (FBO) where the aircraft was last refueled reported that the fuel truck log sheets and interviews with company personnel indicated the airplane was refueled with 53 gallons of JET-A fuel. The lineman, who refueled the aircraft, reported he put 10 gallons in each wingtip tank and 33 gallons into both main wing fuel tanks. The manager stated the lineman was recently moved to the lineman position and had previously refueled four jets earlier that morning using the JET-A truck with supervision of another lineman. At 0853, the automated weather observing system at CXO reported the wind calm, visibility 3/4 statute mile, 100-foot overcast, temperature 61 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 61 degrees Fahrenheit, and an altimeter setting of 30.09 inches of Mercury. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fuel tank. A four-ounce fuel sample from the left wingtip tank was
"consistent with JET-A fuel." That's one reason I always watch the FBO refuel my plane. Well, that and the mysterious dent in the leading edge of my wing that appeared one day, after an FBO refueled me. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "rip" wrote in message om... Jesus, didn't the Feds fix this problem 20+ years ago with their nozzle restrictor campaign? Your tax dollars at work. Line people on drugs? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sounds like a law suit...
"Big John" wrote in message ... Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Big John Extracted from NTSB report. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On March 15, 2004, at 0830 central standard time, a Beech A36 single-engine airplane, N789SA, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power five miles north of the Lone Star Regional Airport (CXO), near Conroe, Texas. The commercial pilot and one of his two passengers sustained serious injuries. One passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Instrument metrological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. The cross-country flight originated from CXO at 0825, and was destined for Wichita, Kansas. One of the passengers reported that the pilot instructed the Fixed Base Operator to "top off the mains and fill the tips half full." The pilot rated passenger also stated that he did not see the pilot conduct his preflight, but the pilot mentioned to him that he checked the oil. The passenger checked the fuel tanks to see if "the fuel instructions had been completed," and the mains were full and the tip tanks were half full." At this time, the passenger "did not notice anything unusual." The passenger informed the pilot that he had some work to finish and wanted to sit in the back. Due to the request of the pilot, he set in one of the seats facing backwards. The passenger also stated that the pilot started the engine and "no unusual sounds " were heard." While the pilot was going through his checklist, "the engine quit" and the pilot commented "hmm, never done that before." The pilot restarted the engine, and taxied out to the run-up area. Shortly after takeoff, the passenger stated he noted "the humming of the engine was not the humming sound that he was used to hearing in that [air]plane." The engine was "starting to misfire and sputter," as the passenger observed the pilot turning back toward the airport, "because of the unusual engine noises." Subsequently, at an altitude of 2,000 feet, "the engine quit and the airplane was in a steep what seemed to be a slip." The airplane impacted soft terrain near a residential area and came to rest upright. Examination of the airplane by the FAA inspector, who responded to the accident site, revealed both main landing gears were crushed upward through both wing structures. The engine was partially separated from the airframe, and the fuel selector was observed in the "right" position. Examination of the aircraft fuel tanks revealed both wingtip tanks and main tanks were compromised. A "small sample of fuel consistent with 100 low lead fuel" was extracted from the left main fuel tank. A four-ounce fuel sample from the left wingtip tank was "consistent with JET-A fuel." The manager of the fixed base operator (FBO) where the aircraft was last refueled reported that the fuel truck log sheets and interviews with company personnel indicated the airplane was refueled with 53 gallons of JET-A fuel. The lineman, who refueled the aircraft, reported he put 10 gallons in each wingtip tank and 33 gallons into both main wing fuel tanks. The manager stated the lineman was recently moved to the lineman position and had previously refueled four jets earlier that morning using the JET-A truck with supervision of another lineman. At 0853, the automated weather observing system at CXO reported the wind calm, visibility 3/4 statute mile, 100-foot overcast, temperature 61 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 61 degrees Fahrenheit, and an altimeter setting of 30.09 inches of Mercury. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Big John" wrote in message
... Extracted from NTSB report. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On March 15, 2004, at 0830 central standard time, a Beech A36... Seems to be a rash of them. Here's another just 4 days before. http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?...CA153& akey=1 "During a telephone interview with the National Transportation Safety Board investigator-in-charge (IIC), the operator stated that, while at the fuel island, a new employee had mistakenly filled the fuel truck with Jet-A fuel. The employee then used the Jet-A fuel in the truck to refuel the airplane. In an effort to help avoid similar problems, the operated has ordered new nozzles for the fueling points to help distinguish the Jet-A tank from the Avgas tank." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jesus, didn't the Feds fix this problem 20+ years ago with their nozzle
restrictor campaign? Your tax dollars at work. Big John wrote: Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Big John Extracted from NTSB report. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On March 15, 2004, at 0830 central standard time, a Beech A36 single-engine airplane, N789SA, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power five miles north of the Lone Star Regional Airport (CXO), near Conroe, Texas. The commercial pilot and one of his two passengers sustained serious injuries. One passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Instrument metrological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. The cross-country flight originated from CXO at 0825, and was destined for Wichita, Kansas. One of the passengers reported that the pilot instructed the Fixed Base Operator to "top off the mains and fill the tips half full." The pilot rated passenger also stated that he did not see the pilot conduct his preflight, but the pilot mentioned to him that he checked the oil. The passenger checked the fuel tanks to see if "the fuel instructions had been completed," and the mains were full and the tip tanks were half full." At this time, the passenger "did not notice anything unusual." The passenger informed the pilot that he had some work to finish and wanted to sit in the back. Due to the request of the pilot, he set in one of the seats facing backwards. The passenger also stated that the pilot started the engine and "no unusual sounds " were heard." While the pilot was going through his checklist, "the engine quit" and the pilot commented "hmm, never done that before." The pilot restarted the engine, and taxied out to the run-up area. Shortly after takeoff, the passenger stated he noted "the humming of the engine was not the humming sound that he was used to hearing in that [air]plane." The engine was "starting to misfire and sputter," as the passenger observed the pilot turning back toward the airport, "because of the unusual engine noises." Subsequently, at an altitude of 2,000 feet, "the engine quit and the airplane was in a steep what seemed to be a slip." The airplane impacted soft terrain near a residential area and came to rest upright. Examination of the airplane by the FAA inspector, who responded to the accident site, revealed both main landing gears were crushed upward through both wing structures. The engine was partially separated from the airframe, and the fuel selector was observed in the "right" position. Examination of the aircraft fuel tanks revealed both wingtip tanks and main tanks were compromised. A "small sample of fuel consistent with 100 low lead fuel" was extracted from the left main fuel tank. A four-ounce fuel sample from the left wingtip tank was "consistent with JET-A fuel." The manager of the fixed base operator (FBO) where the aircraft was last refueled reported that the fuel truck log sheets and interviews with company personnel indicated the airplane was refueled with 53 gallons of JET-A fuel. The lineman, who refueled the aircraft, reported he put 10 gallons in each wingtip tank and 33 gallons into both main wing fuel tanks. The manager stated the lineman was recently moved to the lineman position and had previously refueled four jets earlier that morning using the JET-A truck with supervision of another lineman. At 0853, the automated weather observing system at CXO reported the wind calm, visibility 3/4 statute mile, 100-foot overcast, temperature 61 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 61 degrees Fahrenheit, and an altimeter setting of 30.09 inches of Mercury. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Big John" wrote in message
... Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Only if you also eliminate all kinds of fuel but Jet-A, and mandate that every single airplane be retrofitted with a diesel. In other words...duh, getting a new diesel on the market isn't going to do anything "top stop this type of accident". |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The fun will begin when the diesel-retrofitted Cherokees and 172's start
asking for Jet A. The pilots will have to watch like hawks to make sure 100 LL doesn't end up in their tanks. -- Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways) "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Big John" wrote in message ... Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Only if you also eliminate all kinds of fuel but Jet-A, and mandate that every single airplane be retrofitted with a diesel. In other words...duh, getting a new diesel on the market isn't going to do anything "top stop this type of accident". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" writes:
"Big John" wrote in message ... Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Only if you also eliminate all kinds of fuel but Jet-A, and mandate that every single airplane be retrofitted with a diesel. In other words...duh, getting a new diesel on the market isn't going to do anything "top stop this type of accident". In fact, getting small single-engine diesel prop planes on the market will *add* to the confusion -- right now, small single-engine planes can be relatively safely assumed to be gasoline-powered. (Sure, I know one shouldn't fuel based on just assumption; but unusual instructions can and should be double-checked, and that would eliminated *some* mistakes.) -- David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com http://www.dd-b.net/carry/ Photos: dd-b.lighthunters.net Snapshots: www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/ Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this the kind of thing which can be caught by looking at the color of the
fuel in the fuel tester? I don't know the color of Jet A, but I was taught to look for the blue color and that if two kinds of fuel are mixed it all turns gray. Anyone know if in practice this would be easily detectable in the fuel strainer? "Big John" wrote in message ... Guess the only way to stop this type of accident is to get that new Diesel on the market? Big John Extracted from NTSB report. This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. On March 15, 2004, at 0830 central standard time, a Beech A36 single-engine airplane, N789SA, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a loss of engine power five miles north of the Lone Star Regional Airport (CXO), near Conroe, Texas. The commercial pilot and one of his two passengers sustained serious injuries. One passenger sustained minor injuries. The airplane was registered to and operated by the pilot. Instrument metrological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 business flight. The cross-country flight originated from CXO at 0825, and was destined for Wichita, Kansas. One of the passengers reported that the pilot instructed the Fixed Base Operator to "top off the mains and fill the tips half full." The pilot rated passenger also stated that he did not see the pilot conduct his preflight, but the pilot mentioned to him that he checked the oil. The passenger checked the fuel tanks to see if "the fuel instructions had been completed," and the mains were full and the tip tanks were half full." At this time, the passenger "did not notice anything unusual." The passenger informed the pilot that he had some work to finish and wanted to sit in the back. Due to the request of the pilot, he set in one of the seats facing backwards. The passenger also stated that the pilot started the engine and "no unusual sounds " were heard." While the pilot was going through his checklist, "the engine quit" and the pilot commented "hmm, never done that before." The pilot restarted the engine, and taxied out to the run-up area. Shortly after takeoff, the passenger stated he noted "the humming of the engine was not the humming sound that he was used to hearing in that [air]plane." The engine was "starting to misfire and sputter," as the passenger observed the pilot turning back toward the airport, "because of the unusual engine noises." Subsequently, at an altitude of 2,000 feet, "the engine quit and the airplane was in a steep what seemed to be a slip." The airplane impacted soft terrain near a residential area and came to rest upright. Examination of the airplane by the FAA inspector, who responded to the accident site, revealed both main landing gears were crushed upward through both wing structures. The engine was partially separated from the airframe, and the fuel selector was observed in the "right" position. Examination of the aircraft fuel tanks revealed both wingtip tanks and main tanks were compromised. A "small sample of fuel consistent with 100 low lead fuel" was extracted from the left main fuel tank. A four-ounce fuel sample from the left wingtip tank was "consistent with JET-A fuel." The manager of the fixed base operator (FBO) where the aircraft was last refueled reported that the fuel truck log sheets and interviews with company personnel indicated the airplane was refueled with 53 gallons of JET-A fuel. The lineman, who refueled the aircraft, reported he put 10 gallons in each wingtip tank and 33 gallons into both main wing fuel tanks. The manager stated the lineman was recently moved to the lineman position and had previously refueled four jets earlier that morning using the JET-A truck with supervision of another lineman. At 0853, the automated weather observing system at CXO reported the wind calm, visibility 3/4 statute mile, 100-foot overcast, temperature 61 degrees Fahrenheit, dew point 61 degrees Fahrenheit, and an altimeter setting of 30.09 inches of Mercury. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|