![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual
mishap report review. They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!). Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia? It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second generator; followed by the loss of the backup system. Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of the aircraft. The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies". BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that
rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew". And it is obvious that the OSO/DSO knew what was happening when the "flying crew members" did not. It's not the first time the "Nav" saved a crew, and all the way across the pond, the Nav is the only guy that really knows where you are. The aircraft was built with 3 generators, and room for a fourth that was not installed to save production $$$. It was determined that it was not "needed" when the electrically heated engine intake anti-ice system would not be installed. Also, the APUs cannot be run in-flight, there is a drive shaft from each APU (there are two) to a Generator that could have brought a generator back online. APU power on the ground brings 2 generators online. Funny that the humanoid stick shakers up front could not fly partial panel with a whiskey compass and air driven attitude indicator and an altimeter that is not tied to the Air Data Computers. BT (20yrs AF Nav, 15 yrs B-1 IOSO) Retired "EDR" wrote in message ... I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual mishap report review. They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!). Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia? It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second generator; followed by the loss of the backup system. Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of the aircraft. The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies". BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the B1B a fly-by wire? If so, does it have computer-assist
stability like the F117 or B2? If the controls are hydraulic - what runs the hydraulic pumps engine or electric? If any of the above are true, it seems like good reason to bail out based upon electrical failure. -Nathan On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:26:42 -0700, "BTIZ" wrote: Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew". And it is obvious that the OSO/DSO knew what was happening when the "flying crew members" did not. It's not the first time the "Nav" saved a crew, and all the way across the pond, the Nav is the only guy that really knows where you are. The aircraft was built with 3 generators, and room for a fourth that was not installed to save production $$$. It was determined that it was not "needed" when the electrically heated engine intake anti-ice system would not be installed. Also, the APUs cannot be run in-flight, there is a drive shaft from each APU (there are two) to a Generator that could have brought a generator back online. APU power on the ground brings 2 generators online. Funny that the humanoid stick shakers up front could not fly partial panel with a whiskey compass and air driven attitude indicator and an altimeter that is not tied to the Air Data Computers. BT (20yrs AF Nav, 15 yrs B-1 IOSO) Retired "EDR" wrote in message ... I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual mishap report review. They describe the different classes of mishap (severity) and list the associated costs of each mishap (your tax dollars at work!). Remember the B-1B that went down off Diego Garcia? It resulted from an engine shutdown after takeoff; which lead to the loss of the first generator; followed by the loss of the second generator; followed by the loss of the backup system. Get this... the DSO and OSO (guys in back), based on the instruments at their stations, told the pilots the aircraft was out of control and punched out. Shortly thereafter, the pilot concluded that the aircraft was indeed out of control and followed the non-flying personal out of the aircraft. The accident board listed, among the reasons for the loss of the aircraft, "contributing design deficiencies". BTW, the cost of the loss... $298,000,000. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 5W0ic.19808$432.8732@fed1read01, BTIZ
wrote: Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew". My apologies to those rated aircrew for my misuse of the term non-flying. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EDR wrote in message ...
I enjoy going to the US military safety websites and reading the annual mishap report review. snip Can you post the web site address? Sounds like interesting reading... Thanks! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mark
wrote: Can you post the web site address? Sounds like interesting reading... Here is the USAF site: http://afsafety.af.mil/magazine/htdocs/pdf/fsmj_f03.pdf Here is the USN site: http://www.safetycenter.navy.mil/aviation/default.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nathan Young" wrote in message ... Is the B1B a fly-by wire? NO If so, does it have computer-assist stability like the F117 or B2? NO If the controls are hydraulic - what runs the hydraulic pumps engine or electric? Hydro from the engines If any of the above are true, it seems like good reason to bail out based upon electrical failure. It's not true, but flying with total electrical failure is tough, and if they could not get them back online or get the plane on the ground in a reasonable time. It would be time to give the jet back to the tax payers. BT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
accepted
BT "EDR" wrote in message ... In article 5W0ic.19808$432.8732@fed1read01, BTIZ wrote: Don't ever call a DSO or OSO, "non-flying" personnel. I worked hard for that rating. They are "rated wings" as opposed to "non rated aircrew". My apologies to those rated aircrew for my misuse of the term non-flying. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
KRMN ILS 33- Interesting Approach | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 21st 04 10:53 PM |
high copper reading in oil analysis | [email protected] | Owning | 1 | March 26th 04 03:32 PM |
FA: WWII Weekend 1991 Program - Reading, PA | Disgo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 6th 04 05:18 PM |
Interesting Read | john smith | Piloting | 0 | January 11th 04 06:54 PM |
ATC Privatization - interesting reading | Simon | General Aviation | 1 | August 31st 03 04:03 AM |