UK1 L9786 Short ScionSenior 1939-10 Rochester.jpg

In article ,
Joseph Testagrose wrote:

begin 644 UK1 L9786 Short ScionSenior 1939-10 Rochester.jpg
[Image]

end

What did it have? 4 Pobjoys? I have heard the the Pobjoy ranks among the
world's worst aircraft engines.

On 08/02/2014 03:50, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Joseph Testagrose wrote:

begin 644 UK1 L9786 Short ScionSenior 1939-10 Rochester.jpg
[Image]

end

What did it have? 4 Pobjoys? I have heard the the Pobjoy ranks among the
world's worst aircraft engines.


There's some information he

http://www.nolemmings.nl/wwiiair/htm...N%20SENIOR.htm

--
Moving Things In Still Pictures

In article ,
®i©ardo wrote:

On 08/02/2014 03:50, Orval Fairbairn wrote:
In article ,
Joseph Testagrose wrote:

begin 644 UK1 L9786 Short ScionSenior 1939-10 Rochester.jpg
[Image]

end

What did it have? 4 Pobjoys? I have heard the the Pobjoy ranks among the
world's worst aircraft engines.


There's some information he

http://www.nolemmings.nl/wwiiair/htm...N%20SENIOR.htm

Yes -- Four 90 HP Pobjoy Niagara III engines! They probably needed four
so they could have at least one running.

The Pobjoy plant was destroyed in a WW-II bombing raid. Given the
reputation of the Pobjoy, I wonder if it was the RAF who bombed it? ;-)