![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. LP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Why crash location is hard to pinpoint
Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 probably crashed 17 days ago. But no floating debris has been found. 'We're not searching for a needle in a haystack,' said Australia's deputy defense chief. 'We're still trying to define where the haystack is.' By Rod McGuirk, Associated Press / March 25, 2014 http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Lates...rd-to-pinpoint |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:51:09 -0500, "LP" wrote:
"Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. The Indian Ocean is a BIG place. 73,556,000 kmē = Indian Ocean 9,826,675 kmē = USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:51:09 -0500, "LP" wrote: "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. The Indian Ocean is a BIG place. 73,556,000 kmē = Indian Ocean 9,826,675 kmē = USA Yes, I do realize how big the Indian Ocean is, I've been on Google Earth before it was called that. When you pull it up, almost the entire picture is water. I wonder how far out the Boeing 777-200's ping will sound? LP |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:12:16 -0500, "LP" wrote:
"Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:51:09 -0500, "LP" wrote: "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. The Indian Ocean is a BIG place. 73,556,000 kmē = Indian Ocean 9,826,675 kmē = USA Yes, I do realize how big the Indian Ocean is, I've been on Google Earth before it was called that. When you pull it up, almost the entire picture is water. I wonder how far out the Boeing 777-200's ping will sound? http://bit.ly/1l2yVGb "The quoted maximum detection range is 2-3km" http://www.hydro-international.com/i...Retrieval.html Given the local water depth is 3,000 ~ 7,000 metres (3km~7km) it might be hard to find?!?! Shill #2 -- Great Tarverisms #5 The pitot tube was added to the first American jets to prevent the kind of failures that killed an entire squadron off Florida. Without P1 and T0 a jet will stall in fog. Thanks to both of you for playing. John rec.aviation.military 11 August 2002 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Government Shill #2" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:12:16 -0500, "LP" wrote: "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:51:09 -0500, "LP" wrote: "Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. The Indian Ocean is a BIG place. 73,556,000 kmē = Indian Ocean 9,826,675 kmē = USA Yes, I do realize how big the Indian Ocean is, I've been on Google Earth before it was called that. When you pull it up, almost the entire picture is water. I wonder how far out the Boeing 777-200's ping will sound? http://bit.ly/1l2yVGb Heh, I've done that to others, doh! "The quoted maximum detection range is 2-3km" http://www.hydro-international.com/i...Retrieval.html Given the local water depth is 3,000 ~ 7,000 metres (3km~7km) it might be hard to find?!?! Wow, needle in a haystack! http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-...326-zqmzg.html LP |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/25/2014 6:51 PM, LP wrote:
"Government Shill #2" wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0500, "LP" wrote: wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:04 AM, LP wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...a-live-updates I'm wondering why all the secrecy in the first ten days, if this is the outcome. Why was the transponder initially turned off, if it wasn't a hijacking or crazy pilot suicide plot? Any ideas or theories? Everything I saw about the pilot didn't sell me on the suicide bit. How about the crew struggling to fly an unfylable maybe depressurized airplane, or passed out? Secrecy? We have NOTHING but alleged opinion, no pieces, no bodies, no verifiable DNA, no NOTHING. I'll wait for facts and data and until then everything stays on the table. I agree that there are more questions than answers, but I can't think of one reason to turn off the transponder if my plane is on fire, depressurized, etc. If the fire was in the transponder, or something effecting the power supply to the transponder... or the depressurisation was caused by the transponder antenna ripping out and leaving a hole in the fuselage...? There's a couple of reasons. Just tossing out some crazy ideas. Thanks for brainstorming for a reason. Seems more than we have got from the media. This morning on abc was all about what the ping sounded like on a real black box. guffaw Just the facts, please, if you can find them abc. At this stage, my money is on the systems being deliberately switched of by person, or persons, unknown. This is based on wild eyed guesswork on my part. I find it strange that it supposedly flew for over 7 hours total. With submarines all over the Indian Ocean, you would think they would have picked up the ping on the box. LP You don't have any idea just how large the Pacific Ocean is. They could have easily lost power or had problems with the avionics and had to pull the circuit breakers which would turn off the IFF and locators. You not only went dark to everyone else, you may find yourself lost over a few hundreds of thousands of water with no land in sight. You are also over an ocean that is something like 23,000 miles deep. The locators onboard that still are working are dark as well after so many miles of ocean insulates the signal. Even if they find wreckage, that may be found hundreds or even a thousand miles away and there is no way to track it back to the crash sight. There is a greater chance of not ever finding where it went down than finding where it went down. -- Visit http://droopyvids.com for free TV and Movies. One of the Largest Collections of Public Domain and Classic TV on the Internet. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:52:43 -0600, Daryl wrote:
You are also over an ocean that is something like 23,000 miles deep. I've told you a MILLION times, do not exaggerate! Shill #2 -- I am so smart...S.M.R.T. Homer J. Simpson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/25/2014 9:01 PM, Government Shill #2 wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:52:43 -0600, Daryl wrote: You are also over an ocean that is something like 23,000 miles deep. I've told you a MILLION times, do not exaggerate! Shill #2 -- I am so smart...S.M.R.T. Homer J. Simpson Change that to feet. -- Visit http://droopyvids.com for free TV and Movies. One of the Largest Collections of Public Domain and Classic TV on the Internet. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:03:32 -0600, Daryl wrote:
On 3/25/2014 9:01 PM, Government Shill #2 wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:52:43 -0600, Daryl wrote: You are also over an ocean that is something like 23,000 miles deep. I've told you a MILLION times, do not exaggerate! Shill #2 Change that to feet. Got it. Shill #2 -- Them Pay Section Disinformation Directorate Ministry of Information Antipodean Division |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Underwater, pt 5 - Malaysia 03.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 31st 09 02:03 PM |
Underwater, pt 5 - Malaysia 02.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 31st 09 02:03 PM |
Underwater, pt 5 - Malaysia 01.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman[_3_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | August 31st 09 02:03 PM |
helicopters Malaysia 5 - sibuhelo5.jpg (1/1) | urbanwriter | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 10th 06 05:21 AM |