![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I know this doesn't make a bit of difference, but I was always that
kid that kept asking why and occasionally a strange question pops into my head and I thought I'd throw it out for the flying gurus to take a stab at if I can explain my question. The AI works on the principle that a spinning gyro will remain in the plane in which it spins, right? If taking a long flight, ie transatlantic, why does flying around the curvature of the Earth not affect this. The plane that parallels the ground in NYC won't be the same plane that parallels the ground in London. Does gravity make it precess gradually or what? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Matt Young said:
my head and I thought I'd throw it out for the flying gurus to take a stab at if I can explain my question. I can't give you a full answer, but the start of that answer is something like "pendulous vanes". The AI is corrected to local horizontal. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "Mission Control clears SMS-1 to Canaveral via thrust vectors, Up, Hold Earth, right turns, expect further clearance in ten days." http://www.avweb.com/news/usedacft/181561-1.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Matt Young" wrote in message
ink.net... [...] The AI works on the principle that a spinning gyro will remain in the plane in which it spins, right? If taking a long flight, ie transatlantic, why does flying around the curvature of the Earth not affect this. As Paul said, the AI has a mechanism in it that pulls the AI straight up and down relative to gravity. This mechanism is always active, even in turns, and so you can theoretically remain in a coordinated turn long enough to create a significant error in the AI. In practice, you almost never remain in a coordinated turn long enough for it to be a problem. A picture would be better to explain how it works, but basically there are air ports at the bottom of the indicator that are normally covered by a little "door" that hangs from above the port. The same vacuum that runs the gyro pulls air through the ports. Whenever the indicator is not straight up and down with respect to gravity, the doors on each side open to the extent that the indicator is tilted. The ports are configured so that a port that opens pushes the indicator in the correct direction to right the indicator back to straight up and down (this includes that they are positioned to account for gyroscopic precession with respect to the force they create). This mechanism is the same thing that brings the AI to vertical after you start the airplane. Look at the AI before you start the engine; you'll almost always find that it's showing a bank and possibly also pitch. After you start the engine and the vacuum pump is working, the righting mechanism brings the AI to the correct position. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: This mechanism is always active, even in turns, and so you can theoretically remain in a coordinated turn long enough to create a significant error in the AI. According to my Jepp manual, any bank over 5 degrees disconnects the erection mechanism, which is why CFIIs recommend steeper banks for instrument work. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
... According to my Jepp manual, any bank over 5 degrees disconnects the erection mechanism By cutting off the airflow to the ports? Makes sense. I would bet that not all AIs are the same, but that's good to know. Thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Phoenix AIM-54A (QUESTION) | Krztalizer | Naval Aviation | 10 | February 23rd 04 07:22 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |